Gonzalo Peraza-Mues, Roberto Ponce-Lopez, Juan Antonio Muñoz Sanchez, Fernanda Cavazos Alanis, Grissel Olivera Martínez, Carlos Brambila Paz
{"title":"Income Segregation Analysis in Limited-Data Contexts: A Methodology Based on Iterative Proportional Fitting","authors":"Gonzalo Peraza-Mues, Roberto Ponce-Lopez, Juan Antonio Muñoz Sanchez, Fernanda Cavazos Alanis, Grissel Olivera Martínez, Carlos Brambila Paz","doi":"10.1111/gean.12367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Since the 1950s, researchers in Urban Geography have created multiple instruments for measuring income segregation. However, the computation of such indexes requires the availability of income data and population distribution for small areal units. This approach is problematic for countries and cities where a government's decennial census does not collect or report income data for small-enough areal units to capture income variability within a neighborhood. To address this gap, we use Iterative Proportional Fitting (IPF) to combine neighborhood-level census data with an individual-level income survey data and then estimate small area discrete and continuous income distributions for each small area. We show that it is possible to compute segregation indices based solely on estimated probability distributions without the need to generate a full synthetic population or to obtain integer population counts. We test our empirical method with the case of Mexican cities, for which global and local indexes of segregation are computed with bootstrapped confidence intervals. The major contributions of this article are twofold. First, it uses a method for income-data generation to measure income segregation. Secondly, it demonstrates a linkage between the computation of segregation measures based on probability distributions and the feasibility of computing them directly from the same IPF estimated distributions of income.</p>","PeriodicalId":12533,"journal":{"name":"Geographical Analysis","volume":"56 1","pages":"79-96"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gean.12367","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographical Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gean.12367","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Since the 1950s, researchers in Urban Geography have created multiple instruments for measuring income segregation. However, the computation of such indexes requires the availability of income data and population distribution for small areal units. This approach is problematic for countries and cities where a government's decennial census does not collect or report income data for small-enough areal units to capture income variability within a neighborhood. To address this gap, we use Iterative Proportional Fitting (IPF) to combine neighborhood-level census data with an individual-level income survey data and then estimate small area discrete and continuous income distributions for each small area. We show that it is possible to compute segregation indices based solely on estimated probability distributions without the need to generate a full synthetic population or to obtain integer population counts. We test our empirical method with the case of Mexican cities, for which global and local indexes of segregation are computed with bootstrapped confidence intervals. The major contributions of this article are twofold. First, it uses a method for income-data generation to measure income segregation. Secondly, it demonstrates a linkage between the computation of segregation measures based on probability distributions and the feasibility of computing them directly from the same IPF estimated distributions of income.
期刊介绍:
First in its specialty area and one of the most frequently cited publications in geography, Geographical Analysis has, since 1969, presented significant advances in geographical theory, model building, and quantitative methods to geographers and scholars in a wide spectrum of related fields. Traditionally, mathematical and nonmathematical articulations of geographical theory, and statements and discussions of the analytic paradigm are published in the journal. Spatial data analyses and spatial econometrics and statistics are strongly represented.