Organizational knowledge management in the context of supply chain 4.0: A systematic literature review and conceptual model proposal

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT Knowledge and Process Management Pub Date : 2021-07-20 DOI:10.1002/kpm.1682
Jeanfrank Teodoro Dantas Sartori, Guilherme Francisco Frederico, Helena de Fátima Nunes Silva
{"title":"Organizational knowledge management in the context of supply chain 4.0: A systematic literature review and conceptual model proposal","authors":"Jeanfrank Teodoro Dantas Sartori,&nbsp;Guilherme Francisco Frederico,&nbsp;Helena de Fátima Nunes Silva","doi":"10.1002/kpm.1682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Organizational Knowledge Management (OKM) has a great potential to contribute to companies and nations. The highest complexity of its application may be found in the scope of the Supply Chain (SC), due to being composed of numerous interrelated organizations, often with quite different characteristics. In addition, the current context of the fourth Industrial Revolution, also called Industry 4.0 (I4.0) that, when occurring within SC, gave birth to what has been called Supply Chain 4.0 (SC4.0), the context in which even more complex challenges to KM could be expected. Since scientific investigations at the intersection of these themes (KM and SC4.0) are still scarce, this research conducts a systematic literature review and a content analysis, both aiming to consolidate the related state-of-the-art of scientific development, capable of sustaining further advances in the field to tackle its new and challenging aspects. It complements and expands previous literature reviews in terms of its focus on SC4.0. In addition, it proposes, grounded in the results achieved, a conceptual model for KM in the context of SC4.0. It was identified that I4.0 brought important changes to the management of supply chains of the Industry 4.0 era and KM within it, although human factor – mainly behavior and relationships – remain a central aspect despite the increased adoption of a broad range of new technologies. Factors that enhance or limit KM in SC4.0 were also discussed and summarized, as well as the main relationships between them. In addition, gaps, limitations, and opportunities for future research are presented.</p>","PeriodicalId":46428,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge and Process Management","volume":"29 2","pages":"147-161"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/kpm.1682","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge and Process Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/kpm.1682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Organizational Knowledge Management (OKM) has a great potential to contribute to companies and nations. The highest complexity of its application may be found in the scope of the Supply Chain (SC), due to being composed of numerous interrelated organizations, often with quite different characteristics. In addition, the current context of the fourth Industrial Revolution, also called Industry 4.0 (I4.0) that, when occurring within SC, gave birth to what has been called Supply Chain 4.0 (SC4.0), the context in which even more complex challenges to KM could be expected. Since scientific investigations at the intersection of these themes (KM and SC4.0) are still scarce, this research conducts a systematic literature review and a content analysis, both aiming to consolidate the related state-of-the-art of scientific development, capable of sustaining further advances in the field to tackle its new and challenging aspects. It complements and expands previous literature reviews in terms of its focus on SC4.0. In addition, it proposes, grounded in the results achieved, a conceptual model for KM in the context of SC4.0. It was identified that I4.0 brought important changes to the management of supply chains of the Industry 4.0 era and KM within it, although human factor – mainly behavior and relationships – remain a central aspect despite the increased adoption of a broad range of new technologies. Factors that enhance or limit KM in SC4.0 were also discussed and summarized, as well as the main relationships between them. In addition, gaps, limitations, and opportunities for future research are presented.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
供应链4.0背景下的组织知识管理:系统文献综述与概念模型建议
组织知识管理(Organizational Knowledge Management, OKM)具有巨大的潜力,可以为企业和国家做出贡献。其应用的最高复杂性可以在供应链(SC)范围内找到,因为它由许多相互关联的组织组成,通常具有完全不同的特征。此外,第四次工业革命的当前背景,也被称为工业4.0 (I4.0),当发生在供应链中时,产生了所谓的供应链4.0 (SC4.0),在这种背景下,可以预期知识管理将面临更复杂的挑战。由于这些主题(KM和SC4.0)交叉的科学调查仍然很少,本研究进行了系统的文献综述和内容分析,旨在巩固相关的科学发展的最新技术,能够在该领域保持进一步的进步,以解决其新的和具有挑战性的方面。它补充和扩展了以前的文献综述,重点关注SC4.0。此外,根据所取得的成果,本文提出了SC4.0背景下知识管理的概念模型。人们认为,工业4.0给工业4.0时代的供应链管理和其中的知识管理带来了重要变化,尽管越来越多地采用了广泛的新技术,但人为因素(主要是行为和关系)仍然是一个核心方面。讨论和总结了影响SC4.0中KM增强或限制的因素,以及它们之间的主要关系。此外,差距,限制和机会,为未来的研究提出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
16.20%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Knowledge and Process Management aims to provide essential information to executives responsible for driving performance improvement in their business or for introducing new ideas to business through thought leadership. The journal meets executives" needs for practical information on the lessons learned from other organizations in the areas of: - knowledge management - organizational learning - core competences - process management
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Unethical favouritism and KH: The mediating role of organisational injustice The next event will be held with more quality: Identifying and prioritizing barriers to knowledge management in sports events Context-driven implementation strategies: Exploring three approaches to implement a lean capability framework within a global production company Toward effective KMS measurement: Usage statistics vs. perceived value
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1