Making Monsters: The Uncanny Power of Dehumanization by David Livingstone Smith (review)

IF 0.8 3区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Human Rights Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1353/hrq.2022.0037
Linda Roland Danil
{"title":"Making Monsters: The Uncanny Power of Dehumanization by David Livingstone Smith (review)","authors":"Linda Roland Danil","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2022.0037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Barsky places Ariel Dorfman’s Death and the Maiden in conversation with Lolita. He invites the reader to consider both the impossibility and the possibility of redemption, of living in the same country with, in Dorfman’s terms, “the most despicable villains.”5 The connection works brilliantly and is as strong an argument as one could make for the usefulness of the enterprise of investigating the experience of refugees through the lens of literature. Throughout the book, Barsky connects the vulnerability of the characters in the literary texts to the vulnerability of refugees and invites consideration of universal human rights. As he points out, many authors of the volumes he examines were quite familiar with migration and border crossing, whether because they lived in places and periods of migration or because they were themselves travelers. As noted earlier Barsky takes care to position the works within the politics of the time in which they were written. We might ask: are these literary works read through the lens of the refugees’ experiences or are the refugees’ experiences read through the lens of the literature? Barsky argues that the lenses are not singular. In bringing together the literary accounts, the legal discourses, information from news media, and examples of migration memoirs, Barsky offers multiple perspectives and at the same time sustains his primary goal of understanding the complexity of refugees fleeing danger, taking risks, entering inhospitable territories, and seeking legal protection.","PeriodicalId":47589,"journal":{"name":"Human Rights Quarterly","volume":"44 1","pages":"848 - 853"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Rights Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2022.0037","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Barsky places Ariel Dorfman’s Death and the Maiden in conversation with Lolita. He invites the reader to consider both the impossibility and the possibility of redemption, of living in the same country with, in Dorfman’s terms, “the most despicable villains.”5 The connection works brilliantly and is as strong an argument as one could make for the usefulness of the enterprise of investigating the experience of refugees through the lens of literature. Throughout the book, Barsky connects the vulnerability of the characters in the literary texts to the vulnerability of refugees and invites consideration of universal human rights. As he points out, many authors of the volumes he examines were quite familiar with migration and border crossing, whether because they lived in places and periods of migration or because they were themselves travelers. As noted earlier Barsky takes care to position the works within the politics of the time in which they were written. We might ask: are these literary works read through the lens of the refugees’ experiences or are the refugees’ experiences read through the lens of the literature? Barsky argues that the lenses are not singular. In bringing together the literary accounts, the legal discourses, information from news media, and examples of migration memoirs, Barsky offers multiple perspectives and at the same time sustains his primary goal of understanding the complexity of refugees fleeing danger, taking risks, entering inhospitable territories, and seeking legal protection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大卫·利文斯通-史密斯的《制造怪物:去人性化的神秘力量》(评论)
巴斯基将阿里尔·多夫曼的《死亡与少女》置于与洛丽塔的对话中。他邀请读者考虑与多尔夫曼笔下的“最卑鄙的恶棍”生活在同一个国家的不可能和救赎的可能性。5这种联系非常有效,是一种强有力的论点,可以通过文学的视角来调查难民的经历。在整本书中,巴尔斯基将文学文本中人物的脆弱性与难民的脆弱性联系起来,并邀请人们考虑普遍人权。正如他所指出的,他所研究的许多卷的作者都非常熟悉移民和过境,无论是因为他们生活在移民的地方和时期,还是因为他们自己就是旅行者。如前所述,巴斯基注意将作品置于其创作时代的政治中。我们可能会问:这些文学作品是从难民的经历来看的,还是从文学的角度来看的?Barsky认为,这些镜头并不是单一的。Barsky将文学叙述、法律论述、新闻媒体信息和移民回忆录的例子结合在一起,提供了多个视角,同时保持了他的主要目标,即了解难民逃离危险、冒险、进入不适宜居住的领土和寻求法律保护的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Now entering its twenty-fifth year, Human Rights Quarterly is widely recognizedas the leader in the field of human rights. Articles written by experts from around the world and from a range of disciplines are edited to be understood by the intelligent reader. The Quarterly provides up-to-date information on important developments within the United Nations and regional human rights organizations, both governmental and non-governmental. It presents current work in human rights research and policy analysis, reviews of related books, and philosophical essays probing the fundamental nature of human rights as defined by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
期刊最新文献
Guerrilla Governance: Troubling Gender in the FARC The Right to Flee the Dangers of War: Rethinking Ukraine's Gender-Based Restriction on Civilian Men's Freedom of Movement Limits to Negotiated Accountability of Economic Accomplices: The Case of Volkswagen do Brasil The Reeducation of Race: Jewishness and the Politics of Antiracism in Postcolonial Thought by Sonali Thakkar (review) The Agency of Refugees and Asylum-Seeking Women in the Face of the Inability of States to Provide Protection Against Sexual and Gender-Based Violence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1