Improvements in Teachers’ Reading Comprehension Instruction and Bilingual Students’ Reading Test Performance in High-Poverty Schools

IF 1.2 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Elementary School Journal Pub Date : 2021-03-01 DOI:10.1086/712604
Georgia Earnest García, B. M. Taylor, P. Pearson, Teresa Méndez Bray, Joan Primeaux, R. A. Mora
{"title":"Improvements in Teachers’ Reading Comprehension Instruction and Bilingual Students’ Reading Test Performance in High-Poverty Schools","authors":"Georgia Earnest García, B. M. Taylor, P. Pearson, Teresa Méndez Bray, Joan Primeaux, R. A. Mora","doi":"10.1086/712604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A mixed-design study investigated how teachers and second/third- and fourth-grade bilingual students in three high-poverty schools responded to dialogic cognitive strategy instruction or dialogic responsive engagement (RE) instruction compared with a treated control (vocabulary). The second graders were taught in Spanish, and the fourth graders were taught in English. Qualitative analysis showed that it took time and additional support for the experimental teachers to move from whole-class instruction to small-group instruction. Although none of the second-grade teachers fully implemented the experimental treatments, the cognitive strategy second graders made significantly higher gains on a Spanish standardized reading test than those in RE. At the fourth-grade level, only one cognitive strategies teacher and one RE teacher fully implemented the experimental instruction. However, the cognitive strategy students performed significantly higher on a curriculum-embedded assessment and had a significantly higher gain on an English standardized reading test than students in the control group.","PeriodicalId":48010,"journal":{"name":"Elementary School Journal","volume":"121 1","pages":"357 - 384"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/712604","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Elementary School Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/712604","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A mixed-design study investigated how teachers and second/third- and fourth-grade bilingual students in three high-poverty schools responded to dialogic cognitive strategy instruction or dialogic responsive engagement (RE) instruction compared with a treated control (vocabulary). The second graders were taught in Spanish, and the fourth graders were taught in English. Qualitative analysis showed that it took time and additional support for the experimental teachers to move from whole-class instruction to small-group instruction. Although none of the second-grade teachers fully implemented the experimental treatments, the cognitive strategy second graders made significantly higher gains on a Spanish standardized reading test than those in RE. At the fourth-grade level, only one cognitive strategies teacher and one RE teacher fully implemented the experimental instruction. However, the cognitive strategy students performed significantly higher on a curriculum-embedded assessment and had a significantly higher gain on an English standardized reading test than students in the control group.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高贫困学校教师阅读理解教学与双语学生阅读测试成绩的提高
一项混合设计研究调查了三所高贫困学校的教师和二/三和四年级双语学生对对话认知策略教学或对话响应性参与(RE)教学的反应,并将其与处理对照(词汇)进行比较。二年级用西班牙语授课,四年级用英语授课。定性分析表明,实验教师从课堂教学转向小组教学需要时间和额外的支持。虽然没有一个二年级教师完全实施实验治疗,但认知策略组二年级学生在西班牙语标准化阅读测试中的成绩明显高于RE组。在四年级水平上,只有一位认知策略组教师和一位RE组教师完全实施了实验指导。然而,认知策略组的学生在课程嵌入评估中的表现明显高于对照组的学生,在英语标准化阅读测试中的成绩也明显高于对照组的学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Elementary School Journal
Elementary School Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Elementary School Journal has served researchers, teacher educators, and practitioners in the elementary and middle school education for over one hundred years. ESJ publishes peer-reviewed articles dealing with both education theory and research and their implications for teaching practice. In addition, ESJ presents articles that relate the latest research in child development, cognitive psychology, and sociology to school learning and teaching. ESJ prefers to publish original studies that contain data about school and classroom processes in elementary or middle schools while occasionally publishing integrative research reviews and in-depth conceptual analyses of schooling.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation and optimization of sequence-based gene regulatory deep learning models. “It’s Just Something That You Have to Do as a Teacher” Front Matter 41 Teachers, 41 Different Ways Predictable Variation in the Implementation of a Curricular Intervention—and Why it Matters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1