Effort inference and prediction by acoustic and movement descriptors in interactions with imaginary objects during Dhrupad vocal improvisation.

IF 3.4 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Wearable technologies Pub Date : 2022-07-05 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1017/wtc.2022.8
Stella Paschalidou
{"title":"Effort inference and prediction by acoustic and movement descriptors in interactions with imaginary objects during Dhrupad vocal improvisation.","authors":"Stella Paschalidou","doi":"10.1017/wtc.2022.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In electronic musical instruments (EMIs), the concept of \"sound sculpting\" was proposed by Mulder, in which imaginary objects are manually sculpted to produce sounds, although promising has had some limitations: driven by pure intuition, only the objects' geometrical properties were mapped to sound, while effort-which is often regarded as a key factor of expressivity in music performance-was neglected. The aim of this paper is to enhance such digital interactions by accounting for the perceptual measure of effort that is conveyed through well-established gesture-sound links in the ecologically valid conditions of non-digital music performances. Thus, it reports on the systematic exploration of effort in Dhrupad vocal improvisation, in which singers are often observed to engage with melodic ideas by manipulating intangible, imaginary objects with their hands. The focus is devising formalized descriptions to infer the amount of effort that such interactions are perceived to require and classify gestures as interactions with elastic versus rigid objects, based on original multimodal data collected in India for the specific study. Results suggest that a good part of variance for both effort levels and gesture classes can be explained through a small set of statistically significant acoustic and movement features extracted from the raw data and lead to rejecting the null hypothesis that effort is unrelated to the musical context. This may have implications on how EMIs could benefit from effort as an intermediate mapping layer and naturally opens discussions on whether physiological data may offer a more intuitive measure of effort in wearable technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":75318,"journal":{"name":"Wearable technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10936277/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wearable technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/wtc.2022.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In electronic musical instruments (EMIs), the concept of "sound sculpting" was proposed by Mulder, in which imaginary objects are manually sculpted to produce sounds, although promising has had some limitations: driven by pure intuition, only the objects' geometrical properties were mapped to sound, while effort-which is often regarded as a key factor of expressivity in music performance-was neglected. The aim of this paper is to enhance such digital interactions by accounting for the perceptual measure of effort that is conveyed through well-established gesture-sound links in the ecologically valid conditions of non-digital music performances. Thus, it reports on the systematic exploration of effort in Dhrupad vocal improvisation, in which singers are often observed to engage with melodic ideas by manipulating intangible, imaginary objects with their hands. The focus is devising formalized descriptions to infer the amount of effort that such interactions are perceived to require and classify gestures as interactions with elastic versus rigid objects, based on original multimodal data collected in India for the specific study. Results suggest that a good part of variance for both effort levels and gesture classes can be explained through a small set of statistically significant acoustic and movement features extracted from the raw data and lead to rejecting the null hypothesis that effort is unrelated to the musical context. This may have implications on how EMIs could benefit from effort as an intermediate mapping layer and naturally opens discussions on whether physiological data may offer a more intuitive measure of effort in wearable technologies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dhrupad声乐即兴创作中与想象物体互动时声学和运动描述符的努力推断和预测
摘要在电子乐器(EMI)中,Mulder提出了“声音雕刻”的概念,其中想象的物体被手动雕刻以产生声音,尽管前景广阔,但也有一些局限性:在纯粹直觉的驱动下,只有物体的几何特性被映射到声音,而努力——通常被认为是音乐表演表现力的关键因素——却被忽视了。本文的目的是通过考虑在非数字音乐表演的生态有效条件下,通过成熟的手势-声音链接传递的努力的感知测量,来增强这种数字互动。因此,它报道了对Dhrupad声乐即兴创作的系统探索,在即兴创作中,歌手经常被观察到通过用手操纵无形的想象物体来参与旋律思想。重点是根据在印度为具体研究收集的原始多模态数据,设计形式化的描述,以推断这种互动需要付出的努力,并将手势归类为与弹性物体和刚性物体的互动。结果表明,努力水平和手势类别的很大一部分方差可以通过从原始数据中提取的一小组具有统计学意义的声学和运动特征来解释,并导致拒绝努力与音乐背景无关的零假设。这可能会对EMI如何从作为中间映射层的努力中受益产生影响,并自然开启了关于生理数据是否可以在可穿戴技术中提供更直观的努力衡量标准的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Concurrent validity of inertial measurement units in range of motion measurements of upper extremity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acute suppression of lower limb spasm by sacral afferent stimulation for people with spinal cord injury: A pilot study GLULA: Linear attention-based model for efficient human activity recognition from wearable sensors Erratum: Validity of estimating center of pressure during walking and running with plantar load from a three-sensor wireless insole - ERRATUM. A novel neck brace to characterize neck mobility impairments following neck dissection in head and neck cancer patients - ADDENDUM.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1