Editor’s Letter

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Correctional Health Care Pub Date : 2020-08-31 DOI:10.3905/jii.2020.11.2.001
Brian R. Bruce
{"title":"Editor’s Letter","authors":"Brian R. Bruce","doi":"10.3905/jii.2020.11.2.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"DaviD rowe Reprints Manager and Advertising Director To open the Fall issue, Huffman and Song propose a novel index reconstitution methodology that significantly reduces the trading volume and trading costs for funds tracking the index, without hurting the style purity of the index. Their reconstitution methodology rebalances a small piece of the index every day, allowing index funds to use their daily cash f lows to rebalance. Bender, Pozen, and Tank analyze US listed IPOs, between 2010 and 2018, that were added to the Russell 1000 and the Russell 2000 Indexes and conclude that index funds could have generated excess returns by buying IPOs prior to their inclusion in the indexes. They develop a risk–return framework that could guide index portfolio managers in timing and sizing their IPO trades prior to their inclusion in indexes. Next, Meziani examines whether frontier markets are suitable to the average investor in terms of the size of their markets, liquidity, and risk-adjusted performance. He concludes that, for now, only their undeniable diversification benefits, an outcome that modern portfolio theory has taught us to highly value, tilt the odds in their favor. Blitz evaluates factor performance for 2010–2019 and finds that there appears to be a clear dichotomy in recent factor performance. While generally accepted factors struggled, various factors that are considered to be inferior or redundant remained effective. Kanuri looks at the risk and return characteristics of environmental, social and governance (ESG) exchange-traded funds (ETFs) since their inception. He finds that performance of equaland value-weighted ESG portfolios outperformed the US market in some periods and underperformed in others. However, over the entire period, IWV outperformed ESG portfolios and had higher absoluteand risk-adjusted performance. To complete this issue, Fang and Olteanu-Veerman examine the efficacies of factor strategies by applying well-known equity factors in China A. They demonstrate that the traditional price momentum factor did not work in China A, however, a sentiment factor based on return reversal and analyst information can better capture behavioral patterns of local investors. As always, we welcome your submissions. Please encourage those you know who have written papers or made good presentations on indexing, ETFs, mutual funds, or related subjects to submit them for consideration. We value your comments and suggestions, so please email us at journals@investmentresearch.org.","PeriodicalId":15399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Correctional Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Correctional Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jii.2020.11.2.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

DaviD rowe Reprints Manager and Advertising Director To open the Fall issue, Huffman and Song propose a novel index reconstitution methodology that significantly reduces the trading volume and trading costs for funds tracking the index, without hurting the style purity of the index. Their reconstitution methodology rebalances a small piece of the index every day, allowing index funds to use their daily cash f lows to rebalance. Bender, Pozen, and Tank analyze US listed IPOs, between 2010 and 2018, that were added to the Russell 1000 and the Russell 2000 Indexes and conclude that index funds could have generated excess returns by buying IPOs prior to their inclusion in the indexes. They develop a risk–return framework that could guide index portfolio managers in timing and sizing their IPO trades prior to their inclusion in indexes. Next, Meziani examines whether frontier markets are suitable to the average investor in terms of the size of their markets, liquidity, and risk-adjusted performance. He concludes that, for now, only their undeniable diversification benefits, an outcome that modern portfolio theory has taught us to highly value, tilt the odds in their favor. Blitz evaluates factor performance for 2010–2019 and finds that there appears to be a clear dichotomy in recent factor performance. While generally accepted factors struggled, various factors that are considered to be inferior or redundant remained effective. Kanuri looks at the risk and return characteristics of environmental, social and governance (ESG) exchange-traded funds (ETFs) since their inception. He finds that performance of equaland value-weighted ESG portfolios outperformed the US market in some periods and underperformed in others. However, over the entire period, IWV outperformed ESG portfolios and had higher absoluteand risk-adjusted performance. To complete this issue, Fang and Olteanu-Veerman examine the efficacies of factor strategies by applying well-known equity factors in China A. They demonstrate that the traditional price momentum factor did not work in China A, however, a sentiment factor based on return reversal and analyst information can better capture behavioral patterns of local investors. As always, we welcome your submissions. Please encourage those you know who have written papers or made good presentations on indexing, ETFs, mutual funds, or related subjects to submit them for consideration. We value your comments and suggestions, so please email us at journals@investmentresearch.org.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
编者的信
Daved rowe再版经理兼广告总监为了开启秋季发行,Huffman和Song提出了一种新颖的指数重组方法,该方法显著降低了跟踪指数的基金的交易量和交易成本,同时又不损害指数的风格纯度。他们的重组方法每天都会重新平衡指数的一小部分,允许指数基金使用每日现金流来重新平衡。Bender、Pozen和Tank分析了2010年至2018年间加入罗素1000指数和罗素2000指数的美国上市IPO,并得出结论,指数基金可能在IPO纳入指数之前通过购买IPO产生了超额回报。他们制定了一个风险回报框架,可以指导指数投资组合经理在将其纳入指数之前确定IPO交易的时间和规模。接下来,Meziani考察了前沿市场在市场规模、流动性和风险调整后的表现方面是否适合普通投资者。他得出的结论是,就目前而言,只有他们不可否认的多元化收益,现代投资组合理论教会我们高度重视这一结果,才有利于他们。Blitz评估了2010-2019年的要素绩效,发现最近的要素绩效似乎存在明显的二分法。虽然普遍接受的因素很困难,但被认为是低劣或多余的各种因素仍然有效。Kanuri研究了环境、社会和治理(ESG)交易所交易基金(ETF)自成立以来的风险和回报特征。他发现,等价值加权ESG投资组合在某些时期的表现优于美国市场,在其他时期则表现不佳。然而,在整个期间,IWV的表现优于ESG投资组合,具有更高的绝对和风险调整表现。为了完成这一问题,Fang和Olteanu Veerman通过应用中国A著名的股票因素来检验因子策略的有效性。他们证明了传统的价格动量因素在中国A不起作用。然而,基于回报反转和分析师信息的情绪因素可以更好地捕捉当地投资者的行为模式。一如既往,我们欢迎您提交意见。请鼓励那些你认识的在索引、ETF、共同基金或相关主题上写过论文或做过良好演讲的人提交论文供考虑。我们重视您的意见和建议,请发送电子邮件至journals@investmentresearch.org.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Correctional Health Care
Journal of Correctional Health Care PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal of Correctional Health Care is the only national, peer-reviewed scientific journal to focus on this complex and evolving field. Targeting clinicians, allied health practitioners and administrators, it is the primary resource for information on research and developments in clinical care for chronic and infectious disease, mental health care, substance abuse treatment, health services management, quality improvement, medical records, medical-legal issues, discharge planning, staffing, cost analysis and other topics. Coverage includes empirical research, case studies, best practices, literature reviews and letters, plus NCCHC clinical guidelines and position statements. A self-study exam offers CE credit for health care professionals.
期刊最新文献
Nutritional Characteristics of Menus in State Prisons. Self-Study Program Editor’s Letter Journal of Correctional Health Care Editor’s Letter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1