Clinical efficacy of three-dimensional visualization technique combined with enhanced recovery after surgery in the treatment of hepatolithiasis

C. Fang, Lin-yun He, Wen Zhu, Haoyu Hu, Jian Yang, N. Zeng, Yingfang Fan, S. Wen, N. Xiang
{"title":"Clinical efficacy of three-dimensional visualization technique combined with enhanced recovery after surgery in the treatment of hepatolithiasis","authors":"C. Fang, Lin-yun He, Wen Zhu, Haoyu Hu, Jian Yang, N. Zeng, Yingfang Fan, S. Wen, N. Xiang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-9752.2019.08.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the clinical efficacy of three-dimensional visualization technique (3DVT) combined with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in the treatment of hepatolithiasis. \n \n \nMethods \nThe retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 64 patients with hepatolithiasis who were admitted to Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University from November 2015 to August 2018 were collected. There were 17 males and 47 females, aged from 30 to 82 years, with a median age of 55 years. Of the 64 patients, 23 who completed preoperative assessment and planning using 3DVT, and furthermore received ERAS for perioperative management were divided into 3DVT + ERAS group, and 41 who received preoperative assessment merely under the guidance of 3DVT, combined with conventional perioperative management were divided into 3DVT + conventional group. Observation indicators: (1) preoperative CT and 3DVT assessment; (2) perioperative conditions; (3) follow-up. The follow-up was conducted by outpatient service, e-mail or telephone interview to detect the postoperative recurrence of hepatolithiasis up to March 2019. The measurement data with normal distribution were expressed as Mean±SD, and the t test was used for comparison between groups. The measurement data with skewed distribution were expressed as M (P25, P75), and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison between groups. The count data were expressed as absolute numbers or percentages, and the comparison between groups was performed using the chi-square test or Fisher exact probability. \n \n \nResults \n(1) Preoperative CT and 3DVT assessment: 23 patients in the 3DVT + ERAS group underwent preoperative CT examination and 3DVT assessment, the consistency between CT results and intraoperative findings was 91.3%(21/23), and the consistency between 3DVT results and intraoperative findings was 95.7%(22/23). Fourty-one patients in the 3DVT + conventional group underwent preoperative CT examination and 3DVT assessment, the consistency between CT results and intraoperative findings was 90.2%(37/41), and the consistency between 3DVT results and intraoperative findings was 95.1%(39/41). (2) Perioperative conditions: the volume of intraoperative blood loss, duration of postoperative hospital stay, postoperative total bilirubin, postoperative direct bilirubin, postoperative albumin, postoperative alanine aminotransferase, postoperative aspartate aminotransferase and postoperative hemoglobin were 50 mL (10 mL, 100 mL), 8 days (7 days, 9 days), 12 μmol/L (9 μmol/L, 16 μmol/L), 6 μmol/L (4 μmol/L, 8 μmol/L), (37±4)g/L, 44 U/L (18 U/L, 85 U/L), 32 U/L (20 U/L, 65 U/L), (117±18)g/L in the 3DVT + ERAS group, and 100 mL (50 mL, 300 mL), 13 days (10 days, 16 days), 17 μmol/L (12 μmol/L, 33 μmol/L), 11 μmol/L (7 μmol/L, 21 μmol/L), (29±6)g/L, 78 U/L (43 U/L, 122 U/L), 121 U/L (72 U/L, 176 U/L), (106±13)g/L in the 3DVT + conventional group, respectively; there were significant differences between two groups (Z=-3.084, -4.827, -2.953, -3.632, t=5.261, Z=-2.960, -4.625, t=2.773, P<0.05). Two patients had pulmonary infection and 2 had pleural effusion in the 3DVT + ERAS group, and all the 4 patients were cured after treatment. One case of biliary fistula, 4 cases of pulmonary infection and 5 cases of pleural effusion occurred in the 3DVT + conventional group, and these patients were cured by adequate abdominal drainage, antibiotic therapy and thoracocentesis, respectively. There was no perioperative death in either group. (3) Follow-up: 64 patients were followed up for 6-36 months, with a median time of 23 months. During the follow-up, no recurrent hepatolithiasis in the 3DVT + ERAS group, and 1 case of recurrent hepatolithiasis was confirmed by ultrasound in the 3DVT + conventional group. No cholangiocarcinoma occurred in either group. \n \n \nConclusion \nThe combination of 3DVT and ERAS is effective, safe and feasible in the management of hepatolithiasis, which can accelerate the postoperative recovery of liver function, thus enhancing perioperative recovery and improving the prognosis of patients simultaneously. \n \n \nKey words: \nHepatolithiasis; Three-dimensional visualization; Enhanced recovery after surgery; Efficacy; Diagnosis; Management","PeriodicalId":36400,"journal":{"name":"中华消化外科杂志","volume":"18 1","pages":"785-791"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华消化外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-9752.2019.08.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of three-dimensional visualization technique (3DVT) combined with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in the treatment of hepatolithiasis. Methods The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 64 patients with hepatolithiasis who were admitted to Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University from November 2015 to August 2018 were collected. There were 17 males and 47 females, aged from 30 to 82 years, with a median age of 55 years. Of the 64 patients, 23 who completed preoperative assessment and planning using 3DVT, and furthermore received ERAS for perioperative management were divided into 3DVT + ERAS group, and 41 who received preoperative assessment merely under the guidance of 3DVT, combined with conventional perioperative management were divided into 3DVT + conventional group. Observation indicators: (1) preoperative CT and 3DVT assessment; (2) perioperative conditions; (3) follow-up. The follow-up was conducted by outpatient service, e-mail or telephone interview to detect the postoperative recurrence of hepatolithiasis up to March 2019. The measurement data with normal distribution were expressed as Mean±SD, and the t test was used for comparison between groups. The measurement data with skewed distribution were expressed as M (P25, P75), and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison between groups. The count data were expressed as absolute numbers or percentages, and the comparison between groups was performed using the chi-square test or Fisher exact probability. Results (1) Preoperative CT and 3DVT assessment: 23 patients in the 3DVT + ERAS group underwent preoperative CT examination and 3DVT assessment, the consistency between CT results and intraoperative findings was 91.3%(21/23), and the consistency between 3DVT results and intraoperative findings was 95.7%(22/23). Fourty-one patients in the 3DVT + conventional group underwent preoperative CT examination and 3DVT assessment, the consistency between CT results and intraoperative findings was 90.2%(37/41), and the consistency between 3DVT results and intraoperative findings was 95.1%(39/41). (2) Perioperative conditions: the volume of intraoperative blood loss, duration of postoperative hospital stay, postoperative total bilirubin, postoperative direct bilirubin, postoperative albumin, postoperative alanine aminotransferase, postoperative aspartate aminotransferase and postoperative hemoglobin were 50 mL (10 mL, 100 mL), 8 days (7 days, 9 days), 12 μmol/L (9 μmol/L, 16 μmol/L), 6 μmol/L (4 μmol/L, 8 μmol/L), (37±4)g/L, 44 U/L (18 U/L, 85 U/L), 32 U/L (20 U/L, 65 U/L), (117±18)g/L in the 3DVT + ERAS group, and 100 mL (50 mL, 300 mL), 13 days (10 days, 16 days), 17 μmol/L (12 μmol/L, 33 μmol/L), 11 μmol/L (7 μmol/L, 21 μmol/L), (29±6)g/L, 78 U/L (43 U/L, 122 U/L), 121 U/L (72 U/L, 176 U/L), (106±13)g/L in the 3DVT + conventional group, respectively; there were significant differences between two groups (Z=-3.084, -4.827, -2.953, -3.632, t=5.261, Z=-2.960, -4.625, t=2.773, P<0.05). Two patients had pulmonary infection and 2 had pleural effusion in the 3DVT + ERAS group, and all the 4 patients were cured after treatment. One case of biliary fistula, 4 cases of pulmonary infection and 5 cases of pleural effusion occurred in the 3DVT + conventional group, and these patients were cured by adequate abdominal drainage, antibiotic therapy and thoracocentesis, respectively. There was no perioperative death in either group. (3) Follow-up: 64 patients were followed up for 6-36 months, with a median time of 23 months. During the follow-up, no recurrent hepatolithiasis in the 3DVT + ERAS group, and 1 case of recurrent hepatolithiasis was confirmed by ultrasound in the 3DVT + conventional group. No cholangiocarcinoma occurred in either group. Conclusion The combination of 3DVT and ERAS is effective, safe and feasible in the management of hepatolithiasis, which can accelerate the postoperative recovery of liver function, thus enhancing perioperative recovery and improving the prognosis of patients simultaneously. Key words: Hepatolithiasis; Three-dimensional visualization; Enhanced recovery after surgery; Efficacy; Diagnosis; Management
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三维可视化技术结合术后强化恢复治疗肝内胆管结石的临床疗效
目的探讨三维可视化技术(3DVT)联合术后增强恢复(ERAS)治疗肝内胆管结石的临床疗效。方法采用回顾性队列研究。收集2015年11月至2018年8月南方医科大学珠江医院收治的64例肝内胆管结石患者的临床病理资料。男性17例,女性47例,年龄30 ~ 82岁,中位年龄55岁。64例患者中,23例采用3DVT完成术前评估和计划,并接受ERAS进行围手术期管理的患者分为3DVT + ERAS组,41例仅在3DVT指导下进行术前评估并结合常规围手术期管理的患者分为3DVT +常规组。观察指标:(1)术前CT、3DVT评估;(2)围手术期情况;(3)跟进。随访至2019年3月,采用门诊、邮件或电话随访等方式,了解术后肝内胆管结石复发情况。计量资料符合正态分布,用Mean±SD表示,组间比较采用t检验。偏态分布的计量资料用M (P25, P75)表示,组间比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验。计数数据以绝对数字或百分比表示,组间比较采用卡方检验或Fisher精确概率。(1)术前CT及3DVT评估:3DVT + ERAS组23例患者行术前CT检查及3DVT评估,CT结果与术中表现一致性为91.3%(21/23),3DVT结果与术中表现一致性为95.7%(22/23)。3DVT +常规组41例患者术前行CT检查及3DVT评估,CT结果与术中表现一致性为90.2%(37/41),3DVT结果与术中表现一致性为95.1%(39/41)。(2)围手术期条件:3DVT + ERAS组术中出血量、术后住院时间、术后总胆红素、术后直接胆红素、术后白蛋白、术后丙氨酸转氨酶、术后天冬氨酸转氨酶、术后血红蛋白分别为50 mL (10 mL、100 mL)、8 d (7 d、9 d)、12 μmol/L (9 μmol/L、16 μmol/L)、6 μmol/L (4 μmol/L、8 μmol/L)、(37±4)g/L、44 U/L (18 U/L、85 U/L)、32 U/L (20 U/L、65 U/L)、(117±18)g/L;3DVT +常规组分别为100 mL (50 mL、300 mL)、13天(10天、16天)、17 μmol/L (12 μmol/L、33 μmol/L)、11 μmol/L (7 μmol/L、21 μmol/L)、(29±6)g/L、78 U/L (43 U/L、122 U/L)、121 U/L (72 U/L、176 U/L)、(106±13)g/L;两组间差异有统计学意义(Z=-3.084, -4.827, -2.953, -3.632, t=5.261, Z=-2.960, -4.625, t=2.773, P<0.05)。3DVT + ERAS组2例发生肺部感染,2例发生胸腔积液,4例患者经治疗均治愈。3DVT +常规组发生胆瘘1例,肺部感染4例,胸腔积液5例,均经充分腹腔引流、抗生素治疗、胸腔穿刺术治愈。两组患者均无围手术期死亡。(3)随访:64例患者随访6 ~ 36个月,中位时间23个月。随访期间,3DVT + ERAS组无肝内胆管结石复发,3DVT +常规组超声证实肝内胆管结石复发1例。两组均未发生胆管癌。结论3DVT联合ERAS治疗肝内胆管结石有效、安全、可行,可加快术后肝功能恢复,从而提高围手术期恢复,同时改善患者预后。关键词:肝内胆管结石;三维可视化;增强术后恢复;功效;诊断;管理
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中华消化外科杂志
中华消化外科杂志 Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4544
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Targeting Caregiver Psychopathology in Parent Management Training for Adolescents: A Scoping Review of Commercially Available Treatment Resources. Concept renovation: a new perspective of minimally invasive surgery Clinical strategies for COVID-19 in surgeons Clinical value of outpatient screening in department of general surgery during the COVID-19 outbreak Influencing factors and clinical significance of liver function damage in patients diagnosed with COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1