Dockless bike-sharing’s impact on mode substitution and influential factors: Evidence from Beijing, China

IF 1.6 4区 工程技术 Q4 TRANSPORTATION Journal of Transport and Land Use Pub Date : 2022-02-01 DOI:10.5198/jtlu.2022.1983
Zheyan Chen, Dea van Lierop, D. Ettema
{"title":"Dockless bike-sharing’s impact on mode substitution and influential factors: Evidence from Beijing, China","authors":"Zheyan Chen, Dea van Lierop, D. Ettema","doi":"10.5198/jtlu.2022.1983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a newly emerged bike-sharing system, dockless bike-sharing has the potential to positively influence urban mobility by encouraging active cycling and drawing users from car, public transit and walking. However, scant empirical research explores the extent to which dockless bike-sharing replaces other travel modes for different travel purposes. There is a lack of knowledge about how dockless bike-sharing users’ personal characteristics and neighborhood environment features influence their mode substitution behaviors. Using survey data collected from residents in Beijing and geodata of land use and public transit, we conduct four multinomial logistic models to explore potential mode-substitution behaviors influenced by dockless bike-sharing for four travel purposes: work or education commuting, sports and leisure, grocery shopping, and recreational activities such as shopping, eating and drinking. The results indicate that, for the majority of respondents, dockless bike-sharing systems potentially substitute for walking or public transit. In addition, our analysis of travel attitudes points out that dockless bike-sharing not only attracts bicycle lovers but also users with a preference or positive attitude toward other travel modes. The positive association between the length of bicycle paths and the likelihood of potentially replacing public transit or motorized vehicles by dockless bike-sharing also reveals that the cycling infrastructure of residential neighborhood could be an important facilitator for users of public transit and motorized vehicles to switch to dockless bike-sharing systems.","PeriodicalId":47271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport and Land Use","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport and Land Use","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2022.1983","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

As a newly emerged bike-sharing system, dockless bike-sharing has the potential to positively influence urban mobility by encouraging active cycling and drawing users from car, public transit and walking. However, scant empirical research explores the extent to which dockless bike-sharing replaces other travel modes for different travel purposes. There is a lack of knowledge about how dockless bike-sharing users’ personal characteristics and neighborhood environment features influence their mode substitution behaviors. Using survey data collected from residents in Beijing and geodata of land use and public transit, we conduct four multinomial logistic models to explore potential mode-substitution behaviors influenced by dockless bike-sharing for four travel purposes: work or education commuting, sports and leisure, grocery shopping, and recreational activities such as shopping, eating and drinking. The results indicate that, for the majority of respondents, dockless bike-sharing systems potentially substitute for walking or public transit. In addition, our analysis of travel attitudes points out that dockless bike-sharing not only attracts bicycle lovers but also users with a preference or positive attitude toward other travel modes. The positive association between the length of bicycle paths and the likelihood of potentially replacing public transit or motorized vehicles by dockless bike-sharing also reveals that the cycling infrastructure of residential neighborhood could be an important facilitator for users of public transit and motorized vehicles to switch to dockless bike-sharing systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无桩共享单车对模式替代的影响及影响因素:来自北京的证据
作为一种新兴的共享单车系统,无桩共享单车有可能通过鼓励主动骑自行车,吸引汽车、公共交通和步行的用户,对城市交通产生积极影响。然而,很少有实证研究探讨无桩共享单车在多大程度上取代了其他出行方式,以满足不同的出行目的。无桩共享单车用户的个人特征和周边环境特征对其模式替代行为的影响尚不清楚。利用北京市居民的调查数据和土地利用和公共交通的地理数据,我们建立了4个多项逻辑模型,探讨无桩共享单车在工作或教育通勤、运动和休闲、杂货购物和娱乐活动(如购物、吃饭和喝酒)等4种出行目的下的潜在模式替代行为。结果表明,对于大多数受访者来说,无桩共享单车系统有可能取代步行或公共交通。此外,我们对出行态度的分析指出,无桩共享单车不仅吸引了自行车爱好者,也吸引了对其他出行方式有偏好或积极态度的用户。自行车道长度与无桩共享单车取代公共交通或机动车辆的可能性之间的正相关关系也表明,居民区的自行车基础设施可能是公共交通和机动车辆用户转向无桩共享单车系统的重要促进因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
34
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Transport and Land Usepublishes original interdisciplinary papers on the interaction of transport and land use. Domains include: engineering, planning, modeling, behavior, economics, geography, regional science, sociology, architecture and design, network science, and complex systems. Papers reporting innovative methodologies, original data, and new empirical findings are especially encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Access-based land value appreciation for assessing project benefits Revealing social dimensions of urban mobility with big data: A timely dialogue Exploring practices for facilitating integrated strategic land use and transport planning in the Nordic countries Does rail transit access affect firm dynamics? Analysis of firm births and closures in Maryland, USA Incorporating diminishing returns to opportunities in access: Development of an open-source walkability index based on multi-activity accessibility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1