Co-working, co-learning and culture – co-creation of future tech lab in Namibia

IF 2.6 Q3 MANAGEMENT Journal of Corporate Real Estate Pub Date : 2021-08-19 DOI:10.1108/jcre-01-2021-0004
Marko Lahti, Suvi Nenonen, E. Sutinen
{"title":"Co-working, co-learning and culture – co-creation of future tech lab in Namibia","authors":"Marko Lahti, Suvi Nenonen, E. Sutinen","doi":"10.1108/jcre-01-2021-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nFuture places for learning and working are digitally and physically integrated hybrid environments. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the co-creation process of the remote presence-based digital and physical co-working and co-learning place. The context is cross-cultural when Finnish space approach is applied and further developed in Namibia.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA qualitative case study is conducted of the Future Tech Lab (FT Lab) in the University of Namibia’s main campus. The case study of the FT Lab is about 200m2 space with three different zones in the University of Namibia’s main campus. The physical solution encourages collaboration and technical solutions interlink the place overseas by using the remote presence. The data are gathered by using document analysis, observations, participatory workshops and interviews including structured questionnaire.\n\n\nFindings\nThe action design research approach is a functional framework to co-create hybrid environments in two ways. It helps to design digital and physical solutions as integrated entity. Additionally, it provides a tool to analyse decision-making processes as well as design initiatives, also from the cultural perspective. Both Finnish and Namibian cultures are normative and feminine, which helped the realisation of the project based on mutual trust. However, the differences in power distance were affecting the process fluency and decision-making processes.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe findings indicate that the co-design of the hybrid-learning environment sets requirements for the physical solution such as surface materials for premises and retrofitting of technology, which need to be considered by co-creation from the shared vision to realisation of the space. The co-creation involves many stakeholders, and cultural differences have a different impact on various stages of the co-creation process.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe cultural context in the case study provides an interesting comparison between the Finnish and Namibian approach. The remote presence and its requirements provide new knowledge and guidelines for co-creation of hybrid environments.\n","PeriodicalId":45969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Real Estate","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Real Estate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcre-01-2021-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Future places for learning and working are digitally and physically integrated hybrid environments. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the co-creation process of the remote presence-based digital and physical co-working and co-learning place. The context is cross-cultural when Finnish space approach is applied and further developed in Namibia. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative case study is conducted of the Future Tech Lab (FT Lab) in the University of Namibia’s main campus. The case study of the FT Lab is about 200m2 space with three different zones in the University of Namibia’s main campus. The physical solution encourages collaboration and technical solutions interlink the place overseas by using the remote presence. The data are gathered by using document analysis, observations, participatory workshops and interviews including structured questionnaire. Findings The action design research approach is a functional framework to co-create hybrid environments in two ways. It helps to design digital and physical solutions as integrated entity. Additionally, it provides a tool to analyse decision-making processes as well as design initiatives, also from the cultural perspective. Both Finnish and Namibian cultures are normative and feminine, which helped the realisation of the project based on mutual trust. However, the differences in power distance were affecting the process fluency and decision-making processes. Research limitations/implications The findings indicate that the co-design of the hybrid-learning environment sets requirements for the physical solution such as surface materials for premises and retrofitting of technology, which need to be considered by co-creation from the shared vision to realisation of the space. The co-creation involves many stakeholders, and cultural differences have a different impact on various stages of the co-creation process. Originality/value The cultural context in the case study provides an interesting comparison between the Finnish and Namibian approach. The remote presence and its requirements provide new knowledge and guidelines for co-creation of hybrid environments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纳米比亚未来科技实验室的共同工作、共同学习和共同创造
目的未来的学习和工作场所是数字化和物理一体化的混合环境。本文的目的是分析基于远程存在的数字和物理协同工作和协同学习场所的共创过程。当芬兰的空间方法在纳米比亚得到应用和进一步发展时,背景是跨文化的。设计/方法/方法对纳米比亚大学主校区的未来技术实验室(FT实验室)进行了定性案例研究。FT实验室的案例研究位于纳米比亚大学主校区,占地约200平方米,有三个不同的区域。物理解决方案鼓励合作,技术解决方案通过远程存在将海外连接起来。数据是通过文件分析、观察、参与式研讨会和访谈(包括结构化问卷)收集的。发现行动设计研究方法是一种以两种方式共同创建混合环境的功能框架。它有助于将数字和物理解决方案设计为集成实体。此外,它还提供了一个从文化角度分析决策过程和设计举措的工具。芬兰和纳米比亚的文化都是规范的和女性化的,这有助于在相互信任的基础上实现该项目。然而,权力距离的差异正在影响过程的流畅性和决策过程。研究局限性/含义研究结果表明,混合学习环境的共同设计对物理解决方案提出了要求,如房屋表面材料和技术改造,需要通过从共同愿景到实现空间的共同创造来考虑这些要求。共创涉及许多利益相关者,文化差异对共创过程的各个阶段有不同的影响。创意/价值案例研究中的文化背景提供了芬兰和纳米比亚方法之间有趣的比较。远程存在及其要求为共同创建混合环境提供了新的知识和指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Choosing where to work: an empirical study of collaborative activities’ impact on workspace choice behavior Open-plan office employees’ perceived mental and social well-being A comprehensive analysis of the implications of artificial intelligence adoption on employee social well-being in South African facility management organizations Knowledge work productivity in an activity-based workplace: a comparative analysis COVID-19 outcomes: exploring the footprints of the pandemic on the office sector in Johannesburg, South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1