Carbon dioxide mitigation co-benefit analysis of energy-related measures in the Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan in the Jing-Jin-Ji region of China

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Resources, Conservation and Recycling: X Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rcrx.2019.100006
Zhenyu Lu , Lin Huang , Jun Liu , Ying Zhou , Mindong Chen , Jianlin Hu
{"title":"Carbon dioxide mitigation co-benefit analysis of energy-related measures in the Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan in the Jing-Jin-Ji region of China","authors":"Zhenyu Lu ,&nbsp;Lin Huang ,&nbsp;Jun Liu ,&nbsp;Ying Zhou ,&nbsp;Mindong Chen ,&nbsp;Jianlin Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.rcrx.2019.100006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To improve air quality and protect public health, the State Council of China issued the National Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan (‘the Action Plan’) in 2013. Specific measures were designed in the Action Plan to reduce emissions of atmospheric pollutants, with core contents in energy related measures. Implementing these measures would potentially have significant co-benefits on carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) emissions. This study quantitatively analyzes the impacts of the different measures in the Action Plan on the emissions of major air pollutants of sulfur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>), nitrogen oxides (NO<sub>X</sub>), particulate matter (PM) and CO<sub>2</sub> in the Jing-Jin-Ji (JJJ, i.e., Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei) region using the Greenhouse Gas and Air Pollution Interactions and Synergies model (GAINS)-China model. The results show that the Action Plan in JJJ would reduce 47.3 ± 0.8% of SO<sub>2</sub>, 32.5 ± 2.6% of NOx, 15.2 ± 0.2% of PM<sub>2.5</sub>, and 39.9 ± 5.3% CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, compared to the emissions in 2012. PM<sub>2.5</sub> emission reduction has the highest co-benefit for CO<sub>2</sub> reduction in JJJ, and also in Tianjin and Hebei. In Beijing, NOx emission reduction has high co-benefit for CO<sub>2</sub> reduction, when considering the relative degree of co-benefit. Among the different source sectors, industrial and residential sectors are identified to be the source sectors that contribute the most to the co-benefit of CO<sub>2</sub> emission reduction in JJJ. The results suggest that implementing energy replacement in the industrial and residential sectors in JJJ can not only generate large amounts of air pollutants emission reduction, but also can lead to significant CO<sub>2</sub> emission reduction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36714,"journal":{"name":"Resources, Conservation and Recycling: X","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rcrx.2019.100006","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources, Conservation and Recycling: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590289X19300040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

Abstract

To improve air quality and protect public health, the State Council of China issued the National Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan (‘the Action Plan’) in 2013. Specific measures were designed in the Action Plan to reduce emissions of atmospheric pollutants, with core contents in energy related measures. Implementing these measures would potentially have significant co-benefits on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. This study quantitatively analyzes the impacts of the different measures in the Action Plan on the emissions of major air pollutants of sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOX), particulate matter (PM) and CO2 in the Jing-Jin-Ji (JJJ, i.e., Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei) region using the Greenhouse Gas and Air Pollution Interactions and Synergies model (GAINS)-China model. The results show that the Action Plan in JJJ would reduce 47.3 ± 0.8% of SO2, 32.5 ± 2.6% of NOx, 15.2 ± 0.2% of PM2.5, and 39.9 ± 5.3% CO2 emissions, compared to the emissions in 2012. PM2.5 emission reduction has the highest co-benefit for CO2 reduction in JJJ, and also in Tianjin and Hebei. In Beijing, NOx emission reduction has high co-benefit for CO2 reduction, when considering the relative degree of co-benefit. Among the different source sectors, industrial and residential sectors are identified to be the source sectors that contribute the most to the co-benefit of CO2 emission reduction in JJJ. The results suggest that implementing energy replacement in the industrial and residential sectors in JJJ can not only generate large amounts of air pollutants emission reduction, but also can lead to significant CO2 emission reduction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
京津冀地区大气污染防治行动计划中能源相关措施的二氧化碳减排协同效益分析
为了改善空气质量,保护公众健康,中国国务院于2013年发布了《全国大气污染防治行动计划》(简称《行动计划》)。《行动计划》提出了减少大气污染物排放的具体措施,核心内容是能源减排措施。实施这些措施可能会对二氧化碳排放产生重大的协同效益。本研究采用温室气体与大气污染相互作用与协同效应模型(GAINS)-中国模型,定量分析了《行动计划》中不同措施对京津冀地区主要大气污染物二氧化硫(SO2)、氮氧化物(NOX)、颗粒物(PM)和CO2排放的影响。结果表明,与2012年相比,实施《行动计划》后,JJJ SO2排放量减少47.3%±0.8%,NOx排放量减少32.5±2.6%,PM2.5排放量减少15.2±0.2%,CO2排放量减少39.9±5.3%。京津冀、天津、河北的PM2.5减排对CO2减排的协同效益最高。在北京,从协同效益的相对程度来看,NOx减排对CO2减排具有较高的协同效益。在不同的来源部门中,工业和住宅部门被确定为JJJ二氧化碳减排共同效益贡献最大的来源部门。研究结果表明,在京津冀工业和居民领域实施能源替代,不仅可以大量减少大气污染物的排放,还可以显著减少二氧化碳的排放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resources, Conservation and Recycling: X
Resources, Conservation and Recycling: X Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
Reconfiguring repair: Contested politics and values of repair challenge instrumental discourses found in circular economies literature WITHDRAWN: Development of an Input-output model for Food-Energy-Water Nexus in the Pacific Northwest, USA The re-direction of small deposit mining: Technological solutions for raw materials supply security in a whole systems context WITHDRAWN: Insights from combining techno-economic and life cycle assessment - a case study of polyphenol extraction from red wine pomace Being shown samples of composted, granulated faecal sludge strongly influences acceptability of its use in peri-urban subsistence agriculture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1