Assessment of the impact of construction materials on the building’s thermal behaviour and indoor thermal comfort in a hot and semi-arid climate

IF 2.1 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Advances in Building Energy Research Pub Date : 2022-07-14 DOI:10.1080/17512549.2022.2096692
Fatima-Zahra El-Bichri, I. Sobhy, Imane Bouchefra, B. Benhamou, H. Chehouani, Mohamed Oualid Mghazli
{"title":"Assessment of the impact of construction materials on the building’s thermal behaviour and indoor thermal comfort in a hot and semi-arid climate","authors":"Fatima-Zahra El-Bichri, I. Sobhy, Imane Bouchefra, B. Benhamou, H. Chehouani, Mohamed Oualid Mghazli","doi":"10.1080/17512549.2022.2096692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper aims to identify the most suitable construction materials in terms of building’s energy performance and indoor thermal comfort for a hot and semi-arid climate. An experimental validated TRNSYS-based numerical model was set to carry out dynamic simulations for the energy performance assessment of four similar houses built with different materials, namely Cinder Blocks, Reinforced Concrete, Fired Bricks, or Rammed Earth. The results show that the rammed earth house had the best thermal performance thanks to its high thermal mass, which helped maintain a stable indoor air temperature for optimal thermal comfort. Adding shading and night natural ventilation contributed to the further improvement of the rammed earth house's thermal performance. Indeed, the annual heating/cooling load of the rammed earth house was 23%, 11% and 3% lower than the reinforced concrete, cinder blocks and fired bricks houses, respectively. These thermal load differences were much more reduced to 51%, 24% and 5%, respectively, after adding the shading and night natural ventilation techniques. Furthermore, this study evaluated the use of low embodied energy and weak carbon footprint construction materials to achieve a good building's thermal performance and acceptable indoor thermal comfort.","PeriodicalId":46184,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Building Energy Research","volume":"16 1","pages":"711 - 735"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Building Energy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17512549.2022.2096692","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper aims to identify the most suitable construction materials in terms of building’s energy performance and indoor thermal comfort for a hot and semi-arid climate. An experimental validated TRNSYS-based numerical model was set to carry out dynamic simulations for the energy performance assessment of four similar houses built with different materials, namely Cinder Blocks, Reinforced Concrete, Fired Bricks, or Rammed Earth. The results show that the rammed earth house had the best thermal performance thanks to its high thermal mass, which helped maintain a stable indoor air temperature for optimal thermal comfort. Adding shading and night natural ventilation contributed to the further improvement of the rammed earth house's thermal performance. Indeed, the annual heating/cooling load of the rammed earth house was 23%, 11% and 3% lower than the reinforced concrete, cinder blocks and fired bricks houses, respectively. These thermal load differences were much more reduced to 51%, 24% and 5%, respectively, after adding the shading and night natural ventilation techniques. Furthermore, this study evaluated the use of low embodied energy and weak carbon footprint construction materials to achieve a good building's thermal performance and acceptable indoor thermal comfort.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估建筑材料在炎热和半干旱气候下对建筑物热性能和室内热舒适的影响
摘要:本文旨在确定在炎热和半干旱气候下最适合建筑能源性能和室内热舒适的建筑材料。采用实验验证的trnsys数值模型,对使用煤渣砖、钢筋混凝土、烧结砖或夯土等不同材料建造的四座类似房屋进行了能源性能评估的动态模拟。结果表明:夯土房屋具有较高的热质量,能够保持室内空气温度稳定,达到最佳的热舒适性。增加遮阳和夜间自然通风有助于进一步改善夯土房屋的热性能。夯土房屋的年热/冷负荷分别比钢筋混凝土、煤渣砖和烧砖房屋低23%、11%和3%。在增加遮阳和夜间自然通风技术后,这些热负荷差异分别减少到51%,24%和5%。此外,本研究评估了低隐含能量和低碳足迹的建筑材料的使用,以实现良好的建筑热工性能和可接受的室内热舒适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Building Energy Research
Advances in Building Energy Research CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Numerical study on thermal performance of a building design integrating two passive Trombe walls Impact of courtyard on indoor thermal environment in vernacular row houses of warm and humid climate: case study of Kanyakumari, Tamil Nadu Capillary sorption, thermo physical characterizations and simulation study of an eco-friendly building material reinforced with Chamarrops humilis fibres Numerical investigation of indoor thermal comfort and air quality for an office equipped with corner impinging jet ventilation Research on the thermal environment in a climate chamber with different high-temperature combinations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1