Learning Cycle-6e and Cognitive Conflict Strategies: The Remedial Learning to Overcome Misconceptions

Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Pub Date : 2020-08-11 DOI:10.17977/um048v26i1p29-38

Rolisonia Rona Kecima Jeharut, S. Subandi, Habiddin Habiddin

{"title":"Learning Cycle-6e and Cognitive Conflict Strategies: The Remedial Learning to Overcome Misconceptions","authors":"Rolisonia Rona Kecima Jeharut, S. Subandi, Habiddin Habiddin","doi":"10.17977/um048v26i1p29-38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: The purposes of this study were to identify students' misconceptions on acid-base concepts; examine the effectiveness of the Learning Cycle-6E models and cognitive conflict strategies in overcoming students' misconceptions; measure the retention of students' understanding of the concept. A descriptive and pre-experimental design with one group pretest-posttest design was employed in the study. 30 secondary school students from a public school in the province of Nusa Tenggara Timur, Indonesia. A three-tier instrument was applied to reveal students’ misconceptions as well as their scientific understanding. A paired t-test stastical procedure was apllied to uncover the effectiveness of the Learning Cycle-6E and cognitive conflict strategies. The retention of students' conceptual retention was measured in 3 weeks after the intervention (the implementation of Learning Cycle-6E models and cognitive conflict strategies). Several students’ misconception in the topic of acid-base have been uncovered. Also, that Learning Cycle-6E and cognitive conflict strategies are powerful in reducing misconceptions is proven. This paper also highlights that retention of students scientific understanding was also in very good criteria","PeriodicalId":30895,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17977/um048v26i1p29-38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of this study were to identify students' misconceptions on acid-base concepts; examine the effectiveness of the Learning Cycle-6E models and cognitive conflict strategies in overcoming students' misconceptions; measure the retention of students' understanding of the concept. A descriptive and pre-experimental design with one group pretest-posttest design was employed in the study. 30 secondary school students from a public school in the province of Nusa Tenggara Timur, Indonesia. A three-tier instrument was applied to reveal students’ misconceptions as well as their scientific understanding. A paired t-test stastical procedure was apllied to uncover the effectiveness of the Learning Cycle-6E and cognitive conflict strategies. The retention of students' conceptual retention was measured in 3 weeks after the intervention (the implementation of Learning Cycle-6E models and cognitive conflict strategies). Several students’ misconception in the topic of acid-base have been uncovered. Also, that Learning Cycle-6E and cognitive conflict strategies are powerful in reducing misconceptions is proven. This paper also highlights that retention of students scientific understanding was also in very good criteria

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

学习周期-6e与认知冲突策略:克服误解的补救性学习

摘要:本研究旨在了解学生对酸碱概念的误解;考察学习周期6e模型和认知冲突策略在克服学生误解方面的有效性;衡量学生对概念理解的保留程度。本研究采用描述性和实验前设计，一组前测后测设计。印度尼西亚努沙登加拉帖木儿省一所公立学校的30名中学生。一个三层的工具被用来揭示学生的误解以及他们的科学理解。采用配对t检验统计程序来揭示学习周期6e和认知冲突策略的有效性。在实施学习周期6e模型和认知冲突策略后3周测量学生的概念保留情况。几个学生对酸碱问题的误解已经被揭露。此外，学习周期6e和认知冲突策略在减少误解方面具有强大的作用。本文还强调，学生对科学理解的保留也处于很好的标准中

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

10 weeks