Taper and individual tree volume equations of Eucalyptus varieties under contrasting irrigation regimes

IF 1.5 4区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science Pub Date : 2022-05-24 DOI:10.33494/nzjfs522022x181x
J. Valverde, R. Rubilar, A. Medina, O. Mardones, Verónica Emhart, Daniel Bozo, Yosselin Espinoza, Octavio Campoe
{"title":"Taper and individual tree volume equations of Eucalyptus varieties under contrasting irrigation regimes","authors":"J. Valverde, R. Rubilar, A. Medina, O. Mardones, Verónica Emhart, Daniel Bozo, Yosselin Espinoza, Octavio Campoe","doi":"10.33494/nzjfs522022x181x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Compatible taper and volume equations are key for traditional growth and yield and current process-based or hybrid models. However, most equations do not consider variables such as genotype, water regime and their interaction, limiting the development of general equations for species or regions. Our research investigated taper and individual tree volume equations for eight Eucalyptus genotypes (E. nitens, E. badjensis, E. smithii, E. camaldulensis x globulus and two varieties of low and high productivity of E. globulus and E. nitens x globulus), all materials are growing under summer irrigated vs. no irrigated conditions.\nMethods: A 7-year old Eucalyptus plantation experiment was sampled considering four representative trees per genotype x water regime combination treatment. Four non-linear taper equations were evaluated: Kozak (2004), Kozak et al. (1969), Ormerod (1973) and Max and Burkhart (1976). In addition, total and merchantable volume was evaluated with the Schumacher and Hall (1933) equation. The effect of genotype, irrigation regime and interaction were evaluated for each equation. Then, the best taper equation was selected from adjusted coefficient of determination, mean square error, and AIC and BIC parameters. Finally, the validation of evaluations was carried out with the Leave-One-Out Jackknife method.\nResults: Genotype, irrigation regime, or the interaction were not statistically significant for all evaluated taper - volume equations and a generalised model equation was obtained. The best taper equation was Kozak (2004) which showed the best fit and adaptation to irregular boles. Regarding volume equations, all showed a trend to underestimate volume (total and merchantable) in trees with a volume greater than 0.22 m3. Validation of the equations showed reduced bias suggesting that the equations can be used to predict taper and volume regardless of Eucalyptus genotype x irrigation regimen combinations.\nConclusions: Our results suggest a negligible or minor effect of irrigation (water resource availability) and genotype (for tested taxas and genotypes) on taper and individual tree volume equations. A generalised taper and volume equation (total and merchantable) may be used for all tested genotypes, regardless of water regime (site water availability). This generalised model would simplify Eucalyptus estimates required for stand management and projection.","PeriodicalId":19172,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33494/nzjfs522022x181x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Compatible taper and volume equations are key for traditional growth and yield and current process-based or hybrid models. However, most equations do not consider variables such as genotype, water regime and their interaction, limiting the development of general equations for species or regions. Our research investigated taper and individual tree volume equations for eight Eucalyptus genotypes (E. nitens, E. badjensis, E. smithii, E. camaldulensis x globulus and two varieties of low and high productivity of E. globulus and E. nitens x globulus), all materials are growing under summer irrigated vs. no irrigated conditions. Methods: A 7-year old Eucalyptus plantation experiment was sampled considering four representative trees per genotype x water regime combination treatment. Four non-linear taper equations were evaluated: Kozak (2004), Kozak et al. (1969), Ormerod (1973) and Max and Burkhart (1976). In addition, total and merchantable volume was evaluated with the Schumacher and Hall (1933) equation. The effect of genotype, irrigation regime and interaction were evaluated for each equation. Then, the best taper equation was selected from adjusted coefficient of determination, mean square error, and AIC and BIC parameters. Finally, the validation of evaluations was carried out with the Leave-One-Out Jackknife method. Results: Genotype, irrigation regime, or the interaction were not statistically significant for all evaluated taper - volume equations and a generalised model equation was obtained. The best taper equation was Kozak (2004) which showed the best fit and adaptation to irregular boles. Regarding volume equations, all showed a trend to underestimate volume (total and merchantable) in trees with a volume greater than 0.22 m3. Validation of the equations showed reduced bias suggesting that the equations can be used to predict taper and volume regardless of Eucalyptus genotype x irrigation regimen combinations. Conclusions: Our results suggest a negligible or minor effect of irrigation (water resource availability) and genotype (for tested taxas and genotypes) on taper and individual tree volume equations. A generalised taper and volume equation (total and merchantable) may be used for all tested genotypes, regardless of water regime (site water availability). This generalised model would simplify Eucalyptus estimates required for stand management and projection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同灌溉制度下桉树品种锥度和单株体积方程
背景:兼容的锥度和体积方程是传统生长和产量以及当前基于过程或混合模型的关键。然而,大多数方程没有考虑诸如基因型、水分状况及其相互作用等变量,限制了物种或地区一般方程的发展。研究了8个桉树基因型(nitens、badjensis、smithii、camaldulensis x globulus和两个高产和低产量品种)的锥度和单株体积方程,所有材料在夏季灌溉和无灌溉条件下均有生长。方法:选取一个7年生桉树人工林进行试验,每个基因型和水分组合处理4棵有代表性的树。评估了四个非线性锥度方程:Kozak (2004), Kozak等人(1969),Ormerod(1973)和Max和Burkhart(1976)。此外,用舒马赫和霍尔(1933)方程评估了总体积和可销售体积。评估了基因型、灌溉方式和相互作用对每个方程的影响。然后,从调整后的决定系数、均方误差、AIC和BIC参数中选择最佳锥度方程。最后,采用留一刀法对评价结果进行验证。结果:基因型、灌溉方式或相互作用对所有评估的锥度-体积方程都没有统计学意义,并获得了一个广义模型方程。最佳锥度方程为Kozak(2004),对不规则孔具有最佳的拟合和适应性。在体积方程方面,所有研究都显示出低估体积大于0.22 m3的树木的体积(总体积和可销售体积)的趋势。对方程的验证表明,偏差减小,表明该方程可用于预测锥度和体积,而不考虑桉树基因型x灌溉方案组合。结论:我们的研究结果表明,灌溉(水资源可用性)和基因型(对于测试的分类群和基因型)对锥度和单株树体积方程的影响可以忽略不计或很小。广义的锥度和体积方程(总量和可销售)可用于所有测试的基因型,而不考虑水状况(现场水供应情况)。这种广义模型将简化林分管理和预测所需的桉树估算。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
20
审稿时长
39 weeks
期刊介绍: The New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science is an international journal covering the breadth of forestry science. Planted forests are a particular focus but manuscripts on a wide range of forestry topics will also be considered. The journal''s scope covers forestry species, which are those capable of reaching at least five metres in height at maturity in the place they are located, but not grown or managed primarily for fruit or nut production.
期刊最新文献
Impacts of tending on attributes of radiata pine trees and stands in New Zealand – a review Above-ground biomass accumulation in Cerradão managed by the mass ratio Quantitative genetic parameters of heartwood and its chemical traits in a black pine (Pinus nigra J.F.Arnold) clonal seed orchard established in Greece Tree root research in New Zealand: a retrospective ‘review’ with emphasis on soil reinforcement for soil conservation and wind firmness Effect of changes in forest water balance and inferred root reinforcement on landslide occurrence and sediment generation following Pinus radiata harvest on Tertiary terrain, eastern North Island, New Zealand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1