Échelle de temporalité : validation française d’une version courte de la Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI)

IF 0.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychologie Francaise Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.psfr.2021.02.004
A. Fritsch , C. Cuervo-Lombard
{"title":"Échelle de temporalité : validation française d’une version courte de la Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI)","authors":"A. Fritsch ,&nbsp;C. Cuervo-Lombard","doi":"10.1016/j.psfr.2021.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Lewin (1951, p. 75) defined time perspective as the “totality of the individual's view of his psychological future and psychological past existing at a given time”. Indeed, time perspective is considered to guide behaviors and participate in the construction of personal identity. The Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI) was constructed by Zimbardo and Boyd (1999) to measure the five dimensions of time perspective (Past-Negative, Past-Positive, Present-Hedonistic, Present-Fatalistic and Future scales) and contained fifty-six items. The ZTPI was validated in more than twenty countries, as well in France (Apostolidis and Fieulaine, 2004) and a short version (15-25 items) was also studied in numerous cultural settings like in USA, Australia and various European countries. Nevertheless, the short version of the ZTPI has never been validated in French. The aim of this study is to validate a brief French measure of the ZTPI (Zimbardo and Boyd, 1999) in order to apply it to adults of all ages. Based on the long ZTPI (fifty-four items) validated by Apostolidis and Fieulaine (2004), we tested a version containing fifteen items, the ZTPI-15, among 466 adults (18-98 years). The exploratory analysis revealed a factorial structure representing five factors comprising three items for each scale. The model was tested through a confirmatory factorial analysis, showing that the ZTPI-15 fit indices were satisfactory (χ<sup>2</sup>/dl<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.58, RMSEA<!--> <!-->=.066, CFI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.90, AGFI<!--> <!-->=.90, RMSR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.067). Internal consistency and test-retest reliability was verified. Correlations between mean scores of the five factors showed relationships. Present-Fatalistic was related to Past-Negative (r<!--> <!-->=.23) and to Future (r<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->−.20), whereas a correlation between Past-Negative and Future (r<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->−.22) was demonstrated. Moreover, Future related to Past-Positive (r<!--> <!-->=.12). Age was associated to all scales of the ZTPI-15 and the strongest correlation was to Present-Hedonistic (r<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->−.31). The comparison between 253 young adults (M<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->22.5 years) and 160 older adults (M<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->73.3 years) showed that the older were less oriented to Past-Negative and Present-Hedonistic but more to Past-Positive, Present-Fatalistic and Future. Furthermore, educational level was correlated to Fatalistic-Present (r<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->−.28). The validity of the ZTPI-15 was also confirmed with the scores of anxiety and depression and with the Self-Esteem Scale: individuals with high score of anxiety were oriented to Past-Negative (r<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.34) and those with high score of depression were oriented to past-Negative (r<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.27) and Fatalistic-Present (r<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.27). Finally, individuals with low self-esteem were strongly oriented to Past-Negative (r<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->−.45) and Present-Fatalistic (r<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->−.27), and individuals with high self-esteem to Future (r<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.28).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44717,"journal":{"name":"Psychologie Francaise","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.psfr.2021.02.004","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychologie Francaise","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033298421000200","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Lewin (1951, p. 75) defined time perspective as the “totality of the individual's view of his psychological future and psychological past existing at a given time”. Indeed, time perspective is considered to guide behaviors and participate in the construction of personal identity. The Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI) was constructed by Zimbardo and Boyd (1999) to measure the five dimensions of time perspective (Past-Negative, Past-Positive, Present-Hedonistic, Present-Fatalistic and Future scales) and contained fifty-six items. The ZTPI was validated in more than twenty countries, as well in France (Apostolidis and Fieulaine, 2004) and a short version (15-25 items) was also studied in numerous cultural settings like in USA, Australia and various European countries. Nevertheless, the short version of the ZTPI has never been validated in French. The aim of this study is to validate a brief French measure of the ZTPI (Zimbardo and Boyd, 1999) in order to apply it to adults of all ages. Based on the long ZTPI (fifty-four items) validated by Apostolidis and Fieulaine (2004), we tested a version containing fifteen items, the ZTPI-15, among 466 adults (18-98 years). The exploratory analysis revealed a factorial structure representing five factors comprising three items for each scale. The model was tested through a confirmatory factorial analysis, showing that the ZTPI-15 fit indices were satisfactory (χ2/dl = 2.58, RMSEA =.066, CFI = .90, AGFI =.90, RMSR = .067). Internal consistency and test-retest reliability was verified. Correlations between mean scores of the five factors showed relationships. Present-Fatalistic was related to Past-Negative (r =.23) and to Future (r = −.20), whereas a correlation between Past-Negative and Future (r = −.22) was demonstrated. Moreover, Future related to Past-Positive (r =.12). Age was associated to all scales of the ZTPI-15 and the strongest correlation was to Present-Hedonistic (r = −.31). The comparison between 253 young adults (M = 22.5 years) and 160 older adults (M = 73.3 years) showed that the older were less oriented to Past-Negative and Present-Hedonistic but more to Past-Positive, Present-Fatalistic and Future. Furthermore, educational level was correlated to Fatalistic-Present (r = −.28). The validity of the ZTPI-15 was also confirmed with the scores of anxiety and depression and with the Self-Esteem Scale: individuals with high score of anxiety were oriented to Past-Negative (r = .34) and those with high score of depression were oriented to past-Negative (r = .27) and Fatalistic-Present (r = .27). Finally, individuals with low self-esteem were strongly oriented to Past-Negative (r = −.45) and Present-Fatalistic (r = −.27), and individuals with high self-esteem to Future (r = .28).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
时间尺度:Zimbardo时间视角清单(ZTPI)短版本的法国验证
Lewin (1951, p. 75)将时间视角定义为“个体在给定时间内对其心理未来和心理过去的看法的总和”。事实上,时间观被认为可以指导行为并参与个人同一性的构建。津巴多时间视角量表(ZTPI)由津巴多和博伊德(1999)编制,用于测量时间视角的五个维度(过去-消极、过去-积极、现在-享乐主义、现在-宿命主义和未来),共包含56个项目。ZTPI在20多个国家得到了验证,包括法国(Apostolidis和Fieulaine, 2004年),一个简短的版本(15-25个项目)也在许多文化背景下进行了研究,如美国、澳大利亚和欧洲各国。然而,ZTPI的简短版本从来没有在法语中被验证过。本研究的目的是验证法国对ZTPI的简短测量(Zimbardo和Boyd, 1999),以便将其应用于所有年龄段的成年人。在Apostolidis和Fieulaine(2004)验证的长ZTPI(54个项目)的基础上,对466名18-98岁的成年人进行了包含15个项目的ZTPI-15版本的测试。探索性分析揭示了一个析因结构,代表五个因素,包括每个量表的三个项目。通过验证性因子分析对模型进行检验,ZTPI-15拟合指标令人满意(χ2/dl = 2.58, RMSEA =。066, cfi = 0.90, agfi =。90, rmsr = .067)。验证了内部一致性和重测信度。五个因素的平均得分之间呈相关性。“现在-宿命论”与“过去-否定”(r = 0.23)和“未来”(r = - 0.20)相关,而“过去-否定”与“未来”(r = - 0.22)相关。此外,未来与过去阳性相关(r =.12)。年龄与ZTPI-15的所有量表都相关,其中与现在享乐主义的相关性最强(r = - 0.31)。253名青壮年(M = 22.5岁)与160名老年人(M = 73.3岁)的比较表明,老年人对“过去-消极”、“现在-享乐主义”倾向较少,而对“过去-积极”、“现在-宿命主义”和“未来”倾向较多。此外,教育水平与宿命- present相关(r = - 0.28)。ZTPI-15的效度也通过焦虑、抑郁和自尊量表得到证实:焦虑得分高的个体倾向于“过去-消极”(r = 0.34),抑郁得分高的个体倾向于“过去-消极”(r = 0.27)和“宿命-现在”(r = 0.27)。低自尊者倾向于过去负向(r = - 0.45)和现在宿命型(r = - 0.27),高自尊者倾向于未来型(r = .28)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychologie Francaise
Psychologie Francaise PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Psychologie française is the official organ of Société française de psychologie. It publishes original articles, most of the time within thematic issues. Considered as a reference publication, which covers all fields of psychology, its contents are used for tuition.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Terrorisme et terroriste : de l’acte à l’individu qui le commet, différences représentationnelles et émotionnelles L’acquisition de l’expertise ou l’abandon progressif du renforcement des processus génériques Connais-toi toi-même : une perspective globale de la métacognition L’effet du sexe et de l’orientation sexuelle sur les jugements de responsabilité et l’attribution de sanctions dans les homicides conjugaux
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1