A randomised field experiment to test the restorative properties of purpose-built biophilic “regeneration pods”

IF 2.6 Q3 MANAGEMENT Journal of Corporate Real Estate Pub Date : 2020-09-11 DOI:10.1108/jcre-05-2020-0018
Michael Roskams, Barry P. Haynes
{"title":"A randomised field experiment to test the restorative properties of purpose-built biophilic “regeneration pods”","authors":"Michael Roskams, Barry P. Haynes","doi":"10.1108/jcre-05-2020-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: There has been limited investigation into how ‘biophilic design’ (i.e., the \nintegration of nature within the built environment) can be effectively used within the \nworkplace to facilitate the process of psychological restoration. This study focused in \nparticular on the effectiveness of biophilic “restoration pods” in promoting recovery from \nstress. \nDesign/Methodology/Approach: A randomised field experiment was conducted. \nThirty-two employees from a participating organisation completed two tests replicating \ntypical office work (proofreading and arithmetic) and subjective ratings of stress, anxiety, and \ntask-load both before and after a 10-minute micro-break, taken in either the regeneration pods \n(treatment group) or an ordinary meeting room (control group). \nFindings: The results showed that participants who took their break in the \nregeneration pod reported lower post-break anxiety and perceived task-load, and higher postbreak arithmetic task performance, than the control group. \nPractical implications: The findings suggest that purpose-built spaces for restoration \nwithin office buildings will be effective for helping employees to proactively manage their \nstress levels whilst at work. Biophilic design principles will enhance the effectiveness of \nthese spaces, and this does not necessarily need to involve direct exposure to plants or views \nof nature. \nOriginality/Value: To our knowledge, this is the first randomised field experiment to \ntest the effectiveness of a purpose-built space for restoration within offices. Additionally, the \nstudy explores biophilic design strategies which had previously received limited attention in \nthe research literature.","PeriodicalId":45969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Real Estate","volume":"22 1","pages":"297-312"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/jcre-05-2020-0018","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Real Estate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcre-05-2020-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Purpose: There has been limited investigation into how ‘biophilic design’ (i.e., the integration of nature within the built environment) can be effectively used within the workplace to facilitate the process of psychological restoration. This study focused in particular on the effectiveness of biophilic “restoration pods” in promoting recovery from stress. Design/Methodology/Approach: A randomised field experiment was conducted. Thirty-two employees from a participating organisation completed two tests replicating typical office work (proofreading and arithmetic) and subjective ratings of stress, anxiety, and task-load both before and after a 10-minute micro-break, taken in either the regeneration pods (treatment group) or an ordinary meeting room (control group). Findings: The results showed that participants who took their break in the regeneration pod reported lower post-break anxiety and perceived task-load, and higher postbreak arithmetic task performance, than the control group. Practical implications: The findings suggest that purpose-built spaces for restoration within office buildings will be effective for helping employees to proactively manage their stress levels whilst at work. Biophilic design principles will enhance the effectiveness of these spaces, and this does not necessarily need to involve direct exposure to plants or views of nature. Originality/Value: To our knowledge, this is the first randomised field experiment to test the effectiveness of a purpose-built space for restoration within offices. Additionally, the study explores biophilic design strategies which had previously received limited attention in the research literature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项随机现场实验,测试专门建造的亲生物“再生荚”的恢复特性
目的:关于如何在工作场所有效地利用“亲生物设计”(即自然与建筑环境的融合)来促进心理恢复过程的研究有限。这项研究特别关注亲生物的“恢复豆荚”在促进从压力中恢复的有效性。设计/方法/方法:采用随机现场试验。来自某参与组织的32名员工完成了两项测试,分别是在恢复舱(实验组)或普通会议室(对照组)进行的10分钟微休息前后对典型的办公室工作(校对和算术)和压力、焦虑和任务负荷的主观评分。研究发现:结果显示,与对照组相比,在再生舱中休息的参与者报告了更低的休息后焦虑和感知任务负荷,以及更高的休息后算术任务表现。实际意义:研究结果表明,在办公大楼内专门建造的修复空间将有效帮助员工在工作时主动管理他们的压力水平。亲生物设计原则将提高这些空间的有效性,这并不一定需要直接接触植物或自然景观。原创性/价值:据我们所知,这是第一个随机现场实验,旨在测试办公室内专门建造的修复空间的有效性。此外,该研究还探讨了亲生物设计策略,这在以前的研究文献中受到了有限的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Choosing where to work: an empirical study of collaborative activities’ impact on workspace choice behavior Open-plan office employees’ perceived mental and social well-being A comprehensive analysis of the implications of artificial intelligence adoption on employee social well-being in South African facility management organizations Knowledge work productivity in an activity-based workplace: a comparative analysis COVID-19 outcomes: exploring the footprints of the pandemic on the office sector in Johannesburg, South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1