Barriers and facilitators of inappropriate surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in endourological procedures: a qualitative study from Jordan

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Jordan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Pub Date : 2023-07-24 DOI:10.35516/jjps.v16i2.1540
Sondos Abdaljaleel, Rima Hijazeen, M. A. Abdel Jalil, O. Awwad, G. Edwan, M. Amaireh
{"title":"Barriers and facilitators of inappropriate surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in endourological procedures: a qualitative study from Jordan","authors":"Sondos Abdaljaleel, Rima Hijazeen, M. A. Abdel Jalil, O. Awwad, G. Edwan, M. Amaireh","doi":"10.35516/jjps.v16i2.1540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Inappropriate surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) practice increases patients’ morbidity, healthcare cost, and antimicrobial resistance. Several guidelines have been published to set guidance for SAP before endourological procedures. Such guidelines include the American Urological Association (AUA, 2019) and the European Association of Urology (EAU, 2020). Literature reported that compliance with the recommendations of these guidelines has been suboptimal. \nAims: to investigate healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) perspectives on the barriers to international guideline adherence regarding SAP for endourological procedures and the potential strategies to optimize adherence to guidelines recommendations. \nMethodology: This study was a qualitative study based on face-to-face semi-structured interviews conducted with urologists in multiple medical centers across Jordan using a preformulated interview guide regarding barriers and facilitators to the adherence to international guidelines of preoperative SAP during endourological procedures. \nResults: Nineteen urologists were interviewed. Interviews identified many barriers influencing HCP adherence to guidelines, these included factors related to patients, HCPs, the healthcare system, or other external barriers. Also, during the interviews, HCPs suggested many strategies to enhance SAP practice which included increasing patients’ awareness about their actual need for antibiotics, providing training sessions for HCPs about appropriate SAP before endourological procedures, developing national guidelines and conducting local clinical studies, and promoting awareness of the clinical pharmacist's role. In addition to imposing national policy to control antibiotic use and prevent over-the-counter (OTC) prescriptions. \nConclusion: Factors related to nonadherence to guidelines were determined. Such knowledge will constitute the backbone for planning appropriate antimicrobial stewardship programs that involve all stakeholders and address all those aspects to optimize SAP prescribing and reduce antibiotic misuse.","PeriodicalId":14719,"journal":{"name":"Jordan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jordan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35516/jjps.v16i2.1540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Inappropriate surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) practice increases patients’ morbidity, healthcare cost, and antimicrobial resistance. Several guidelines have been published to set guidance for SAP before endourological procedures. Such guidelines include the American Urological Association (AUA, 2019) and the European Association of Urology (EAU, 2020). Literature reported that compliance with the recommendations of these guidelines has been suboptimal. Aims: to investigate healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) perspectives on the barriers to international guideline adherence regarding SAP for endourological procedures and the potential strategies to optimize adherence to guidelines recommendations. Methodology: This study was a qualitative study based on face-to-face semi-structured interviews conducted with urologists in multiple medical centers across Jordan using a preformulated interview guide regarding barriers and facilitators to the adherence to international guidelines of preoperative SAP during endourological procedures. Results: Nineteen urologists were interviewed. Interviews identified many barriers influencing HCP adherence to guidelines, these included factors related to patients, HCPs, the healthcare system, or other external barriers. Also, during the interviews, HCPs suggested many strategies to enhance SAP practice which included increasing patients’ awareness about their actual need for antibiotics, providing training sessions for HCPs about appropriate SAP before endourological procedures, developing national guidelines and conducting local clinical studies, and promoting awareness of the clinical pharmacist's role. In addition to imposing national policy to control antibiotic use and prevent over-the-counter (OTC) prescriptions. Conclusion: Factors related to nonadherence to guidelines were determined. Such knowledge will constitute the backbone for planning appropriate antimicrobial stewardship programs that involve all stakeholders and address all those aspects to optimize SAP prescribing and reduce antibiotic misuse.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阻碍和促进不适当的外科抗菌药物预防在泌尿道手术:一项定性研究从约旦
背景:不适当的外科抗菌预防(SAP)做法会增加患者的发病率、医疗成本和抗菌药物耐药性。已经发布了一些指导方针,为泌尿外科手术前的SAP制定指导方针。此类指南包括美国泌尿学会(AUA,2019)和欧洲泌尿学会(EAU,2020)。文献报告称,遵守这些准则的建议一直是次优的。目的:调查医疗保健专业人员(HCP)对内泌尿外科手术SAP遵守国际指南的障碍的看法,以及优化遵守指南建议的潜在策略。方法:本研究是一项定性研究,基于对约旦多个医疗中心的泌尿科医生进行的面对面半结构化访谈,使用预先制定的访谈指南,了解在泌尿外科手术中遵守术前SAP国际指南的障碍和促进因素。结果:19名泌尿科医生接受了访谈。访谈发现了影响HCP遵守指南的许多障碍,其中包括与患者、HCP、医疗保健系统或其他外部障碍有关的因素。此外,在访谈中,HCP提出了许多加强SAP实践的策略,包括提高患者对抗生素实际需求的认识,在泌尿外科手术前为HCP提供有关适当SAP的培训课程,制定国家指南和进行当地临床研究,以及提高临床药剂师的作用意识。除了实施控制抗生素使用和防止非处方药(OTC)处方的国家政策外。结论:确定了不遵守指南的相关因素。这些知识将构成规划适当的抗菌药物管理计划的支柱,该计划涉及所有利益相关者,并解决所有这些方面的问题,以优化SAP处方并减少抗生素滥用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Jordan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Jordan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The Jordan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (JJPS) is a scientific, bi-annual, peer-reviewed publication that will focus on current topics of interest to the pharmaceutical community at large. Although the JJPS is intended to be of interest to pharmaceutical scientists, other healthy workers, and manufacturing processors will also find it most interesting and informative. Papers will cover basic pharmaceutical and applied research, scientific commentaries, as well as views, reviews. Topics on products will include manufacturing process, quality control, pharmaceutical engineering, pharmaceutical technology, and philosophies on all aspects of pharmaceutical sciences. The editorial advisory board would like to place an emphasis on new and innovative methods, technologies, and techniques for the pharmaceutical industry. The reader will find a broad range of important topics in this first issue.
期刊最新文献
Recent Advances in Development of Vesicular Carrier for Transdermal Drug Delivery: A Review MMP-1 and MMP-7 Expression is Influenced by Ginsenosides in Mice Exposed to Aflatoxin B1: in vivo Study Optimizing Drug Delivery Vehicle with Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) - Based Excipient Selection A Review on Recent Advances of Natural Products as Larvicides in Vector Control Management Evaluation of the Impact of Orange Juice on Apixaban Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Rats
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1