MCDM, EMO and Hybrid Approaches: Tutorial and Review

IF 1.9 Q2 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Mathematical & Computational Applications Pub Date : 2022-12-19 DOI:10.3390/mca27060112
Ankur Sinha, J. Wallenius
{"title":"MCDM, EMO and Hybrid Approaches: Tutorial and Review","authors":"Ankur Sinha, J. Wallenius","doi":"10.3390/mca27060112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most of the practical applications that require optimization often involve multiple objectives. These objectives, when conflicting in nature, pose both optimization as well as decision-making challenges. An optimization procedure for such a multi-objective problem requires computing (computer-based search) and decision making to identify the most preferred solution. Researchers and practitioners working in various domains have integrated computing and decision-making tasks in several ways, giving rise to a variety of algorithms to handle multi-objective optimization problems. For instance, an a priori approach requires formulating (or eliciting) a decision maker’s value function and then performing a one-shot optimization of the value function, whereas an a posteriori decision-making approach requires a large number of diverse Pareto-optimal solutions to be available before a final decision is made. Alternatively, an interactive approach involves interactions with the decision maker to guide the search towards better solutions (or the most preferred solution). In our tutorial and survey paper, we first review the fundamental concepts of multi-objective optimization. Second, we discuss the classic interactive approaches from the field of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM), followed by the underlying idea and methods in the field of Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization (EMO). Third, we consider several promising MCDM and EMO hybrid approaches that aim to capitalize on the strengths of the two domains. We conclude with discussions on important behavioral considerations related to the use of such approaches and future work.","PeriodicalId":53224,"journal":{"name":"Mathematical & Computational Applications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematical & Computational Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/mca27060112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Most of the practical applications that require optimization often involve multiple objectives. These objectives, when conflicting in nature, pose both optimization as well as decision-making challenges. An optimization procedure for such a multi-objective problem requires computing (computer-based search) and decision making to identify the most preferred solution. Researchers and practitioners working in various domains have integrated computing and decision-making tasks in several ways, giving rise to a variety of algorithms to handle multi-objective optimization problems. For instance, an a priori approach requires formulating (or eliciting) a decision maker’s value function and then performing a one-shot optimization of the value function, whereas an a posteriori decision-making approach requires a large number of diverse Pareto-optimal solutions to be available before a final decision is made. Alternatively, an interactive approach involves interactions with the decision maker to guide the search towards better solutions (or the most preferred solution). In our tutorial and survey paper, we first review the fundamental concepts of multi-objective optimization. Second, we discuss the classic interactive approaches from the field of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM), followed by the underlying idea and methods in the field of Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization (EMO). Third, we consider several promising MCDM and EMO hybrid approaches that aim to capitalize on the strengths of the two domains. We conclude with discussions on important behavioral considerations related to the use of such approaches and future work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MCDM, EMO和混合方法:教程和回顾
大多数需要优化的实际应用程序通常涉及多个目标。当这些目标在本质上相互冲突时,会给优化和决策带来挑战。这种多目标问题的优化过程需要计算(基于计算机的搜索)和决策来确定最优选的解决方案。各个领域的研究人员和实践者以多种方式将计算和决策任务集成在一起,从而产生了各种处理多目标优化问题的算法。例如,先验方法需要制定(或推导)决策者的价值函数,然后对价值函数进行一次优化,而后验决策方法需要在做出最终决策之前提供大量不同的帕累托最优解决方案。另外,交互式方法包括与决策者的交互,以指导对更好的解决方案(或最优选的解决方案)的搜索。在我们的教程和调查论文中,我们首先回顾了多目标优化的基本概念。其次,我们讨论了多准则决策(MCDM)领域的经典交互方法,然后讨论了进化多目标优化(EMO)领域的基本思想和方法。第三,我们考虑了几种有前途的MCDM和EMO混合方法,旨在利用这两个领域的优势。最后,我们讨论了与使用这些方法和未来工作相关的重要行为考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mathematical & Computational Applications
Mathematical & Computational Applications MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-
自引率
10.50%
发文量
86
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mathematical and Computational Applications (MCA) is devoted to original research in the field of engineering, natural sciences or social sciences where mathematical and/or computational techniques are necessary for solving specific problems. The aim of the journal is to provide a medium by which a wide range of experience can be exchanged among researchers from diverse fields such as engineering (electrical, mechanical, civil, industrial, aeronautical, nuclear etc.), natural sciences (physics, mathematics, chemistry, biology etc.) or social sciences (administrative sciences, economics, political sciences etc.). The papers may be theoretical where mathematics is used in a nontrivial way or computational or combination of both. Each paper submitted will be reviewed and only papers of highest quality that contain original ideas and research will be published. Papers containing only experimental techniques and abstract mathematics without any sign of application are discouraged.
期刊最新文献
Asymptotic Behavior of Solutions to a Nonlinear Swelling Soil System with Time Delay and Variable Exponents Exploring the Potential of Mixed Fourier Series in Signal Processing Applications Using One-Dimensional Smooth Closed-Form Functions with Compact Support: A Comprehensive Tutorial Conservation Laws and Symmetry Reductions of the Hunter–Saxton Equation via the Double Reduction Method FE2 Computations with Deep Neural Networks: Algorithmic Structure, Data Generation, and Implementation A Computational Fluid Dynamics-Based Model for Assessing Rupture Risk in Cerebral Arteries with Varying Aneurysm Sizes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1