Russell Versus Donnellan on Descriptions

IF 0.3 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY RUSSELL-THE JOURNAL OF THE BERTRAND RUSSELL STUDIES Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.15173/russell.v42i1.5210
W. J. Pollock
{"title":"Russell Versus Donnellan on Descriptions","authors":"W. J. Pollock","doi":"10.15173/russell.v42i1.5210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The paper argues that Donnellan's distinction between the referential and attributive uses of definite descriptions, whilst a genuine feature of language, does not count against Russell's Theory of Descriptions where Russell's theory is regarded as a theory of the semantics of descriptions and not the pragmatics of individual uses on a particular occasion. The argument I shall present is simple but decisive and ought to resolve once and for all the debate about the significance of Donnellan's distinction for Russell's theory, provided of course that Russell's theory really does concern the semantics of definite descriptions rather than their use on particular occasions.","PeriodicalId":41601,"journal":{"name":"RUSSELL-THE JOURNAL OF THE BERTRAND RUSSELL STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUSSELL-THE JOURNAL OF THE BERTRAND RUSSELL STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15173/russell.v42i1.5210","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:The paper argues that Donnellan's distinction between the referential and attributive uses of definite descriptions, whilst a genuine feature of language, does not count against Russell's Theory of Descriptions where Russell's theory is regarded as a theory of the semantics of descriptions and not the pragmatics of individual uses on a particular occasion. The argument I shall present is simple but decisive and ought to resolve once and for all the debate about the significance of Donnellan's distinction for Russell's theory, provided of course that Russell's theory really does concern the semantics of definite descriptions rather than their use on particular occasions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
罗素与唐纳伦的描写
摘要:本文认为,Donnellan对确定描述的指称用法和定语用法的区分虽然是语言的真正特征,但并不违背罗素的描述理论。罗素的描述理论被认为是描述的语义学理论,而不是特定场合下个体用法的语用学理论。我要提出的论点很简单,但很有决定性,它应该能一劳永逸地解决关于唐纳兰的区分对罗素理论的意义的争论,当然,前提是罗素的理论确实关注的是确定描述的语义,而不是它们在特定场合的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Russell: the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies is published semiannually, in the summer and the winter, by The Bertrand Russell Research Centre, McMaster University. Both print and electron ic editions are published. From 1971 until 1999 Russell was titled Russell: the Journal of the Bertrand Russell Archives and was published first by McMaster University Library Press (1971–96) and then by McMaster University Press (1997–99). The ISSN of the print edition is 0036-0163; that of the electronic edition, 1913-8032. Russell is published with the assistance of grants from the Aid to Journals programme of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and from McMaster’s Faculty of Humanities.
期刊最新文献
Squaring the Circles: a Genealogy of Principia’s Dot Notation Causes of War Russell’s Representationalism about Consciousness: Reconsidering His Relationship to James Moore’s Beginnings (review) Jean Nicod: Familial Background and Pacifist Commitment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1