Freedom of Expression and Hate Speech in Ethiopia: Observations (Amharic)

Q4 Social Sciences Mizan Law Review Pub Date : 2021-09-30 DOI:10.4314/mlr.v15i1.7
A. Degol, Bebizuh Mulugeta
{"title":"Freedom of Expression and Hate Speech in Ethiopia: Observations (Amharic)","authors":"A. Degol, Bebizuh Mulugeta","doi":"10.4314/mlr.v15i1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Freedom of expression is one of the human rights enshrined under International human right instruments. However, hate speech in the course of exercising this right has the potential to pose threats on the peace and security of nations and wellbeing of individuals. This has brought about arguments in favor of limitations to expression and against the limitations owing to unintended adverse impact of such limitations in the exercise of freedom of expression. In the Ethiopian case, ‘Hate Speech and Disinformation Prevention and Suppression Proclamation No. 1185/ 2020’ has been enacted.  The Proclamation indicates prohibited acts of hate speech and its exceptions. In particular, the generic terms contained in the definition given to ‘hate speech’ need to be carefully examined. However, the implications of provisions that set exceptions to ‘hate speech’ in the new law have not yet been subject to adequate academic discourse. This article examines these issues. By consulting different international human rights instruments, experience of other countries and scholarly literature, the article examines the appropriateness, constitutionality and implications of the Proclamation on the right to freedom of expression. Moreover, it indicates potential challenges that the exceptions will pose on the process of implementing the Proclamation in real court cases.","PeriodicalId":30178,"journal":{"name":"Mizan Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mizan Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/mlr.v15i1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Freedom of expression is one of the human rights enshrined under International human right instruments. However, hate speech in the course of exercising this right has the potential to pose threats on the peace and security of nations and wellbeing of individuals. This has brought about arguments in favor of limitations to expression and against the limitations owing to unintended adverse impact of such limitations in the exercise of freedom of expression. In the Ethiopian case, ‘Hate Speech and Disinformation Prevention and Suppression Proclamation No. 1185/ 2020’ has been enacted.  The Proclamation indicates prohibited acts of hate speech and its exceptions. In particular, the generic terms contained in the definition given to ‘hate speech’ need to be carefully examined. However, the implications of provisions that set exceptions to ‘hate speech’ in the new law have not yet been subject to adequate academic discourse. This article examines these issues. By consulting different international human rights instruments, experience of other countries and scholarly literature, the article examines the appropriateness, constitutionality and implications of the Proclamation on the right to freedom of expression. Moreover, it indicates potential challenges that the exceptions will pose on the process of implementing the Proclamation in real court cases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚的言论自由和仇恨言论:观察(阿姆哈拉语)
言论自由是国际人权文书规定的人权之一。然而,在行使这一权利的过程中,仇恨言论有可能对国家的和平与安全以及个人的福祉构成威胁。这就产生了赞成限制言论和反对由于这种限制对行使言论自由产生意想不到的不利影响而限制言论的论点。在埃塞俄比亚的案例中,颁布了《预防和压制仇恨言论和虚假信息第1185/ 2020号公告》。《宣言》指出了被禁止的仇恨言论行为及其例外情况。特别是,需要仔细审查“仇恨言论”定义中包含的一般术语。然而,新法律中规定“仇恨言论”例外的条款的含义尚未得到充分的学术讨论。本文将探讨这些问题。通过参考不同的国际人权文书、其他国家的经验和学术文献,本文审查了《言论自由权宣言》的适当性、合宪性和影响。此外,它还表明,例外情况将对在实际法庭案件中执行《公告》的过程构成潜在挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effect of Formalization of Rural Women’s Land Rights in a Plural Justice System: The Case of the Sidama Regional State Concurrence of Crimes under Ethiopian Law: General Principles vis-à-vis Tax Law Regulation of Group of Companies in Ethiopia: A Comparative Overview Private Security Companies in Ethiopia: An Insight from a Rights Perspective Business and Human Rights in Ethiopia: The Status of the Law and the Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1