One-hour plasma glucose level after a 75 g oral glucose load and its relationship to gastric emptying in survivors of critical illness and stress hyperglycaemia

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care and Resuscitation Pub Date : 2022-09-05 DOI:10.51893/2022.3.OA6
Ryan J. Jalleh , Cong Xie , Adam M. Deane , Mark P. Plummer , Karen L. Jones , Michael Horowitz , Palash Kar
{"title":"One-hour plasma glucose level after a 75 g oral glucose load and its relationship to gastric emptying in survivors of critical illness and stress hyperglycaemia","authors":"Ryan J. Jalleh ,&nbsp;Cong Xie ,&nbsp;Adam M. Deane ,&nbsp;Mark P. Plummer ,&nbsp;Karen L. Jones ,&nbsp;Michael Horowitz ,&nbsp;Palash Kar","doi":"10.51893/2022.3.OA6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Objective:</strong> A 1-hour plasma glucose level ≥ 8.6 mmol/L in a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test has been strongly associated with increased morbidity and mortality in outpatients without diabetes. Our primary aim was to evaluate the 1-hour plasma glucose level in a 75 g glucose tolerance test in survivors of critical illness with stress hyperglycaemia at 3 months after intensive care unit (ICU) discharge, with the secondary aims to evaluate the 2-hour plasma glucose level, glycated haemoglobin (HbA<sub>1c</sub>), and gastric emptying.</p><p><strong>Design:</strong><em>Post hoc</em> analysis of a single-centre, prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting:</strong> Single-centre, tertiary referral, mixed medical-surgical ICU.</p><p><strong>Participants:</strong> Consecutively admitted patients aged ≥ 18 years who developed stress hyperglycaemia and survived to hospital discharge were eligible.</p><p><strong>Interventions:</strong> Participants returned at 3 months after ICU discharge and underwent a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures:</strong> One- and 2-hour post load plasma glucose level, HbA<sub>1c</sub>, and assessment of gastric emptying via an isotope breath test.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> Thirty-five patients (12 females; mean age, 58.5 years [SD, 10.5]; mean HbA<sub>1c</sub>, 37.4 mmol/mol [SD, 7.0]) attended the followup. In 32/35 patients (91%) the 1-hour post load plasma glucose level was ≥ 8.6 mmol/L. There was a positive correlation between the plasma glucose level at 1 hour <em>(r</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 0.21; <em>P</em> = 0.006), but no correlation between the 2-hour glucose level (<em>r</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.006; <em>P</em> = 0.63) and gastric emptying.</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Glucose intolerance, when defined as 1-hour glucose level ≥ 8.6 mmol/L following a 75 g oral glucose load, persists at 3 months in most survivors of stress hyperglycaemia and is dependent on the rate of gastric emptying. Longitudinal studies to characterise mechanisms underlying dysglycaemia and progression to diabetes in individuals with stress hyperglycaemia are indicated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49215,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care and Resuscitation","volume":"24 3","pages":"Pages 268-271"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441277223000558/pdfft?md5=421c8b11d93dbb71a3d9302f22984249&pid=1-s2.0-S1441277223000558-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care and Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441277223000558","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: A 1-hour plasma glucose level ≥ 8.6 mmol/L in a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test has been strongly associated with increased morbidity and mortality in outpatients without diabetes. Our primary aim was to evaluate the 1-hour plasma glucose level in a 75 g glucose tolerance test in survivors of critical illness with stress hyperglycaemia at 3 months after intensive care unit (ICU) discharge, with the secondary aims to evaluate the 2-hour plasma glucose level, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), and gastric emptying.

Design:Post hoc analysis of a single-centre, prospective cohort study.

Setting: Single-centre, tertiary referral, mixed medical-surgical ICU.

Participants: Consecutively admitted patients aged ≥ 18 years who developed stress hyperglycaemia and survived to hospital discharge were eligible.

Interventions: Participants returned at 3 months after ICU discharge and underwent a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test.

Main outcome measures: One- and 2-hour post load plasma glucose level, HbA1c, and assessment of gastric emptying via an isotope breath test.

Results: Thirty-five patients (12 females; mean age, 58.5 years [SD, 10.5]; mean HbA1c, 37.4 mmol/mol [SD, 7.0]) attended the followup. In 32/35 patients (91%) the 1-hour post load plasma glucose level was ≥ 8.6 mmol/L. There was a positive correlation between the plasma glucose level at 1 hour (r2 = 0.21; P = 0.006), but no correlation between the 2-hour glucose level (r2 = 0.006; P = 0.63) and gastric emptying.

Conclusion: Glucose intolerance, when defined as 1-hour glucose level ≥ 8.6 mmol/L following a 75 g oral glucose load, persists at 3 months in most survivors of stress hyperglycaemia and is dependent on the rate of gastric emptying. Longitudinal studies to characterise mechanisms underlying dysglycaemia and progression to diabetes in individuals with stress hyperglycaemia are indicated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
危重疾病和应激性高血糖患者口服葡萄糖负荷75 g后1小时血糖水平及其与胃排空的关系
目的:在75 g口服葡萄糖耐量试验中,1小时血浆葡萄糖水平≥8.6 mmol/L与非糖尿病门诊患者发病率和死亡率增加密切相关。我们的主要目的是评估重症监护病房(ICU)出院后3个月伴有应激性高血糖的危重疾病幸存者的75 g葡萄糖耐量试验中1小时血糖水平,次要目的是评估2小时血糖水平、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和胃排空。设计:单中心前瞻性队列研究的事后分析。环境:单中心,三级转诊,混合内科-外科ICU。受试者:年龄≥18岁的连续入院患者,发生应激性高血糖并存活至出院。干预措施:参与者在ICU出院3个月后返回,并进行75 g口服葡萄糖耐量试验。主要结局指标:负荷后1小时和2小时血浆葡萄糖水平、HbA1c,并通过同位素呼吸试验评估胃排空。结果:35例患者(女性12例;平均年龄58.5岁[SD, 10.5];平均HbA1c为37.4 mmol/mol [SD, 7.0])参加了随访。32/35例(91%)患者负荷后1小时血糖≥8.6 mmol/L。1 h时血糖水平与对照组呈正相关(r2 = 0.21;P = 0.006),但与2小时血糖水平无相关性(r2 = 0.006;P = 0.63)和胃排空。结论:葡萄糖耐受不良,定义为口服75 g葡萄糖负荷后1小时葡萄糖水平≥8.6 mmol/L,在大多数应激性高血糖幸存者中持续3个月,并依赖于胃排空率。纵向研究,以表征机制的血糖异常和进展为糖尿病的个体与应激性高血糖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care and Resuscitation
Critical Care and Resuscitation CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
44
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ritical Care and Resuscitation (CC&R) is the official scientific journal of the College of Intensive Care Medicine (CICM). The Journal is a quarterly publication (ISSN 1441-2772) with original articles of scientific and clinical interest in the specialities of Critical Care, Intensive Care, Anaesthesia, Emergency Medicine and related disciplines. The Journal is received by all Fellows and trainees, along with an increasing number of subscribers from around the world. The CC&R Journal currently has an impact factor of 3.3, placing it in 8th position in world critical care journals and in first position in the world outside the USA and Europe.
期刊最新文献
Recommendations for the College of Intensive Care Medicine (CICM) trainee research project: A modified Delphi study ARDS, guidelines and ANZ practice: The persistent disconnect Management of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome in Australia and New Zealand (SAGE-ANZ): An observational study Sonographic evaluation of intracranial hemodynamics and pressure after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: An exploratory sub-study of the TAME trial A retrospective registry-based study into the proportion of patients admitted to intensive care who have anaphylaxis as a principal diagnosis and their outcomes in Australia and New Zealand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1