LA FALACIA DE LA COMPRENSIÓN LECTORA

IF 0.5 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS HELIOS Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.22497/HELIOS.V3I2.1424
José Bruno Cépeda Ruiz
{"title":"LA FALACIA DE LA COMPRENSIÓN LECTORA","authors":"José Bruno Cépeda Ruiz","doi":"10.22497/HELIOS.V3I2.1424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"RESUMEN La comprension lectora, tal como la conocemos en el sistema educativo, es un error que, por mas de cuarenta anos, ha limitado el desarrollo de la comprension lectora y la lectura critica. Con ello, el acto de comprender un texto quedo relegado al mero sistema de resolver preguntas objetivas con cinco alternativas. La lectura ha perdido criticidad porque se ve limitada al pensamiento de quien hace las preguntas en un cuestionario: se ha perdido el gusto por leer. Ademas, la mayoria de docentes han perdido tambien el sentido del acto lector: el gozo. Por ello, terminan condicionando el acto de pensar y comprender un texto, lo que convierte a la lectura en un proceso poco atractivo para las generaciones modernas. Debido a ello, es necesario que se gestione, primero, el habito de leer en los alumnos, para luego dar el paso de comprension lectora. No existen metodos infalibles para mejorar la comprension lectora; el unico metodo para mejorar la comprension lectora es leer. ABSTRACT Reading comprehension, as we know it in the educational system, is an error that, for more than forty years, has limited the development of reading comprehension and critical reading. With this, the act of understanding a text was relegated to the mere system of solving objective questions with five alternatives. The reading has lost criticality because it is limited to the thought of who asks the questions in a questionnaire: the taste for reading has been lost. In addition, most teachers have also lost the sense of the reading act: joy. Therefore, they end up conditioning the act of thinking and understanding a text, which makes reading an unattractive process for modern generations. Because of this, it is necessary to manage, first, the habit of reading in students, then take the step of reading comprehension. There are no infallible methods to improve reading comprehension; the only method to improve reading comprehension is to read.","PeriodicalId":43032,"journal":{"name":"HELIOS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HELIOS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22497/HELIOS.V3I2.1424","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

RESUMEN La comprension lectora, tal como la conocemos en el sistema educativo, es un error que, por mas de cuarenta anos, ha limitado el desarrollo de la comprension lectora y la lectura critica. Con ello, el acto de comprender un texto quedo relegado al mero sistema de resolver preguntas objetivas con cinco alternativas. La lectura ha perdido criticidad porque se ve limitada al pensamiento de quien hace las preguntas en un cuestionario: se ha perdido el gusto por leer. Ademas, la mayoria de docentes han perdido tambien el sentido del acto lector: el gozo. Por ello, terminan condicionando el acto de pensar y comprender un texto, lo que convierte a la lectura en un proceso poco atractivo para las generaciones modernas. Debido a ello, es necesario que se gestione, primero, el habito de leer en los alumnos, para luego dar el paso de comprension lectora. No existen metodos infalibles para mejorar la comprension lectora; el unico metodo para mejorar la comprension lectora es leer. ABSTRACT Reading comprehension, as we know it in the educational system, is an error that, for more than forty years, has limited the development of reading comprehension and critical reading. With this, the act of understanding a text was relegated to the mere system of solving objective questions with five alternatives. The reading has lost criticality because it is limited to the thought of who asks the questions in a questionnaire: the taste for reading has been lost. In addition, most teachers have also lost the sense of the reading act: joy. Therefore, they end up conditioning the act of thinking and understanding a text, which makes reading an unattractive process for modern generations. Because of this, it is necessary to manage, first, the habit of reading in students, then take the step of reading comprehension. There are no infallible methods to improve reading comprehension; the only method to improve reading comprehension is to read.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阅读理解的谬论
摘要的理解,比如读者认识教育系统,这是一个错误,超过40年了,也限制了发展的理解和阅读读者批评。因此,理解文本的行为被降级为用五种选择来解决客观问题的简单系统。阅读已经失去了重要性,因为它被限制在问卷中提出问题的人的思想中:它失去了阅读的乐趣。此外,大多数教师也失去了阅读行为的意义:享受。因此,它们最终决定了思考和理解文本的行为,这使得阅读对现代一代来说是一个没有吸引力的过程。因此,有必要首先管理学生的阅读习惯,然后采取阅读理解的步骤。没有万无一失的方法来提高阅读理解能力;提高阅读理解能力的唯一方法就是阅读。抽象阅读理解,正如我们在教育系统中所知道的,是一个错误,四十多年来限制了阅读理解和批判性阅读的发展。因此,理解文本的行为被归入以五种备选办法解决客观问题的核心体系。《阅读》失去了重要性,因为它被限制在询问问题的人的思想中:阅读的兴趣已经失去了。此外,大多数教师也失去了阅读行为的意义:快乐。因此,他们最终制约了思考和理解文本的行为,这使得阅读对现代一代来说是一个没有吸引力的过程。因此,有必要首先管理学生的阅读习惯,然后采取阅读理解的步骤。没有万无一失的方法可以提高阅读理解能力;他的父亲是一名律师,母亲是一名律师。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
HELIOS
HELIOS CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
Notes on Contributors Being Achilles’ Heir: A Psychoanalytical Reading of Neoptolemus in Sophocles’ Philoctetes Echoes of Ovid? Memories of the Metamorphoses in Philostratus’s Imagines The Chalybes as an Historical People Notes on Contributors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1