About the principle of dignity: philosophical foundations and legal aspects

Márcio Ricardo Staffen, M. Arshakyan
{"title":"About the principle of dignity: philosophical foundations and legal aspects","authors":"Márcio Ricardo Staffen, M. Arshakyan","doi":"10.5007/2177-7055.2017V38N75P43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"EnglishThis paper, starting from deductive method, aims to analyze the coexistence mechanisms of the philosophical foundations of the principle of human dignity by the legal practice, both in legislative documents as judicial decisions. On the metaphysical aspects that keeps in its wake, the principle of human dignity opens spaces for criticism of the consistency and coherence of that principle in legislative works, notably, in judicial decisions. Finally, it is concluded that while the reputation based on dignity is a universal virtue, its content depends largely on social, religious and traditional of certain communities. portuguesO presente artigo cientifico, partindo de metodo dedutivo, pretende analisar os mecanismos de coabitacao dos fundamentos filosoficos do principio da dignidade humana pela pratica juridica, tanto em documentos legislativos quanto em decisoes judiciais. Diante dos aspectos metafisicos que guarda em seu bojo, o principio da dignidade humana abre espacos para criticas sobre a consistencia e a coerencia do referido principio no plano legislativo e, notadamente, nos cenarios jurisdicionais. Por fim, conclui-se que, enquanto a reputacao baseada na dignidade for uma virtude universal, seu conteudo depende largamente de valores sociais, religiosos e tradicionais de certas comunidades.","PeriodicalId":30170,"journal":{"name":"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos","volume":"38 1","pages":"43-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5007/2177-7055.2017V38N75P43","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2017V38N75P43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

EnglishThis paper, starting from deductive method, aims to analyze the coexistence mechanisms of the philosophical foundations of the principle of human dignity by the legal practice, both in legislative documents as judicial decisions. On the metaphysical aspects that keeps in its wake, the principle of human dignity opens spaces for criticism of the consistency and coherence of that principle in legislative works, notably, in judicial decisions. Finally, it is concluded that while the reputation based on dignity is a universal virtue, its content depends largely on social, religious and traditional of certain communities. portuguesO presente artigo cientifico, partindo de metodo dedutivo, pretende analisar os mecanismos de coabitacao dos fundamentos filosoficos do principio da dignidade humana pela pratica juridica, tanto em documentos legislativos quanto em decisoes judiciais. Diante dos aspectos metafisicos que guarda em seu bojo, o principio da dignidade humana abre espacos para criticas sobre a consistencia e a coerencia do referido principio no plano legislativo e, notadamente, nos cenarios jurisdicionais. Por fim, conclui-se que, enquanto a reputacao baseada na dignidade for uma virtude universal, seu conteudo depende largamente de valores sociais, religiosos e tradicionais de certas comunidades.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于尊严原则:哲学基础和法律方面
警示律师论文从演绎法入手,旨在通过法律实践分析人的尊严原则的哲学基础在作为司法裁判的立法文件中的共存机制。关于随之而来的形而上学方面,人的尊严原则为批评该原则在立法工作中,特别是在司法裁决中的一致性和连贯性开辟了空间。最后得出的结论是,虽然建立在尊严基础上的声誉是一种普遍的美德,但其内容在很大程度上取决于某些社区的社会、宗教和传统。这篇科学文章以演绎法为基础,旨在通过法律实践,无论是在立法文件中还是在司法判决中,分析人的尊严原则的哲学基础的同居机制。面对其突出的形而上学方面,人的尊严原则为在立法层面,尤其是在管辖权场景中批评这一原则的一致性和连贯性开辟了空间。最后,得出的结论是,虽然建立在尊严基础上的声誉是一种普遍的美德,但其内容在很大程度上取决于某些社区的社会、宗教和传统价值观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Justice and equality for all? Proportional representation in Belgium and France (1883-1921) A interligação entre a Lei Anticorrupção e o Direito dos Desastres Controle de Integridade e Administração Pública: sinergias necessárias As soluções traçadas no Ordenamento Jurídico Português para o problema do lucro da intervenção Post-Modern Narratives and the Paradigm of Efficiency: participatory democracy on the yellow brick road
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1