Constitucionalismo Crítico: Antonio Negri à luz de Franz Neumann

J. Rodriguez
{"title":"Constitucionalismo Crítico: Antonio Negri à luz de Franz Neumann","authors":"J. Rodriguez","doi":"10.5007/2177-7055.2020v43n84p109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses Antonio Negri’s view of the constitutive power in the light of Franz Neumann’s theory of law. The text presents the essential characteristics of constitutionalism and its critique by Negri (2015) in the book “The Constituent Power”. For Negri (2015), constitutionalism has as its central function to prevent radical social transformation by restraining the constituent power. Next, the text discusses this criticism in the light of Franz Neumann (2009; 2013), seeking to show that not all radical transformation is necessarily progressive, especially if we leave aside certain assurances present in the tradition of constitutionalism.","PeriodicalId":30170,"journal":{"name":"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos","volume":"43 1","pages":"109-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5007/2177-7055.2020v43n84p109","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2020v43n84p109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article discusses Antonio Negri’s view of the constitutive power in the light of Franz Neumann’s theory of law. The text presents the essential characteristics of constitutionalism and its critique by Negri (2015) in the book “The Constituent Power”. For Negri (2015), constitutionalism has as its central function to prevent radical social transformation by restraining the constituent power. Next, the text discusses this criticism in the light of Franz Neumann (2009; 2013), seeking to show that not all radical transformation is necessarily progressive, especially if we leave aside certain assurances present in the tradition of constitutionalism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
批判宪政:弗朗茨·诺伊曼之光下的安东尼奥·内格里
本文从诺依曼的法律理论出发,论述了内格里的构成权观。内格里(2015)在《立宪权》一书中阐述了宪政的本质特征及其批判。对于Negri(2015)来说,宪政的核心功能是通过约束制宪权来阻止激进的社会变革。接下来,本文根据Franz Neumann(2009;2013)讨论了这一批评,试图表明并非所有激进的变革都必然是进步的,尤其是如果我们抛开宪政传统中存在的某些保证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Justice and equality for all? Proportional representation in Belgium and France (1883-1921) A interligação entre a Lei Anticorrupção e o Direito dos Desastres Controle de Integridade e Administração Pública: sinergias necessárias As soluções traçadas no Ordenamento Jurídico Português para o problema do lucro da intervenção Post-Modern Narratives and the Paradigm of Efficiency: participatory democracy on the yellow brick road
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1