Resilience and Self-Reliance in Canadian Food Charter Discourse

Poroi Pub Date : 2020-01-07 DOI:10.13008/2151-2957.1298
Philippa Spoel, Colleen Derkatch
{"title":"Resilience and Self-Reliance in Canadian Food Charter Discourse","authors":"Philippa Spoel, Colleen Derkatch","doi":"10.13008/2151-2957.1298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This article interrogates the rhetoric of “self - reliance” as a common feature of discourses about individual and community resilience by examining Canadian food charters in the context of regional food systems aimed at improving community food security. Despite the association of food charters with alternative food systems and progressive politics, we find that their ambiguous and shifting appeals to self-reliance largely conflict with their stated social justice goals of community food security, particularly the goal of alleviating the distress of food in security for vulnerable community members. Overall, we argue that the rhetoric of self-reliance in Canadian food charters primarily perpetuates a neoliberal ideology of resilience that promotes an active, enterprising ethos of responsibility for one’s own well being, whether at the level of individuals, communities, or food systems. Our study thus contributes to critical scholarship that contextualizes and problematizes specific sites and practices of resilience discourse.","PeriodicalId":93222,"journal":{"name":"Poroi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poroi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13008/2151-2957.1298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

: This article interrogates the rhetoric of “self - reliance” as a common feature of discourses about individual and community resilience by examining Canadian food charters in the context of regional food systems aimed at improving community food security. Despite the association of food charters with alternative food systems and progressive politics, we find that their ambiguous and shifting appeals to self-reliance largely conflict with their stated social justice goals of community food security, particularly the goal of alleviating the distress of food in security for vulnerable community members. Overall, we argue that the rhetoric of self-reliance in Canadian food charters primarily perpetuates a neoliberal ideology of resilience that promotes an active, enterprising ethos of responsibility for one’s own well being, whether at the level of individuals, communities, or food systems. Our study thus contributes to critical scholarship that contextualizes and problematizes specific sites and practices of resilience discourse.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大食品宪章话语中的弹性和自力更生
本文通过在旨在改善社区粮食安全的区域粮食系统背景下研究加拿大食品宪章,对“自力更生”的修辞作为关于个人和社区恢复力的话语的共同特征进行了质疑。尽管粮食宪章与替代粮食系统和进步政治相关联,但我们发现,它们对自力更生的模糊和不断变化的呼吁在很大程度上与它们所陈述的社区粮食安全的社会正义目标相冲突,特别是减轻弱势社区成员粮食安全困境的目标。总的来说,我们认为加拿大食品宪章中自力更生的修辞主要延续了一种新自由主义的弹性意识形态,这种意识形态促进了一种积极进取的精神,无论在个人、社区还是食品系统的层面上,都要为自己的福祉负责。因此,我们的研究有助于将复原力话语的特定地点和实践语境化并提出问题的批判性学术研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Relevance of Discursive Strategies to Information Evaluation Practices Rhetorical Ethnography and the Virtue of Vulnerability in Transdisciplinary Research Methods Binding Brain, Body and World: Pattern as a Figure of Knowledge in Andy Clark’s Work on Predictive Processing Johanna d'Arc of Mongolia As the Fairy Tale of Shock Economy Seeing as Making: Mediation, rhetoric, and the Ultrasound Informed Consent Act
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1