Articulated Imperialism in Pakistan: a Dialectic of ‘Strategic’ and ‘Dependency’ Fixes

IF 1.7 Q2 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Journal of Labor and Society Pub Date : 2022-10-07 DOI:10.1163/24714607-bja10091
Danish Khan
{"title":"Articulated Imperialism in Pakistan: a Dialectic of ‘Strategic’ and ‘Dependency’ Fixes","authors":"Danish Khan","doi":"10.1163/24714607-bja10091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe role of the internal political economic factors of the peripheral countries tends to remain largely muted in the analysis of imperialism. To redress this the paper put forwards an articulated conceptualization of imperialism in the context of the postcolonial state of Pakistan by underscoring the significance of domestic political economic factors in mediating and regulating an imperialist political settlement. Imperialist political settlement is mediated by a combination of two interrelated processes—strategic fix and dependency fix. ‘Strategic fix’ is about addressing actual or perceived political, economic and militaristic challenges --- encapsulating both territorial and capitalist logics of power --- to core countries of the capitalist world system. Whereas, the ‘dependency fix’ is about preventing a radical progressive restructuring in dominated countries (e.g., Pakistan) to ensure a favorable socio-economic order for the domestic elites. One of the key implications of envisioning imperialist domination as a dialectic of strategic and dependency fixes is that it makes visible the shared interests of Pakistani ruling elites and the imperialist forces of blocking progressive and emancipatory political and socio-economic transformation in Pakistan. Therefore, the paper argues that an effective counter-hegemonic project against imperialism needs to incorporate strategies of progressive radical transformation of a dominated country.","PeriodicalId":42634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Labor and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Labor and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/24714607-bja10091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The role of the internal political economic factors of the peripheral countries tends to remain largely muted in the analysis of imperialism. To redress this the paper put forwards an articulated conceptualization of imperialism in the context of the postcolonial state of Pakistan by underscoring the significance of domestic political economic factors in mediating and regulating an imperialist political settlement. Imperialist political settlement is mediated by a combination of two interrelated processes—strategic fix and dependency fix. ‘Strategic fix’ is about addressing actual or perceived political, economic and militaristic challenges --- encapsulating both territorial and capitalist logics of power --- to core countries of the capitalist world system. Whereas, the ‘dependency fix’ is about preventing a radical progressive restructuring in dominated countries (e.g., Pakistan) to ensure a favorable socio-economic order for the domestic elites. One of the key implications of envisioning imperialist domination as a dialectic of strategic and dependency fixes is that it makes visible the shared interests of Pakistani ruling elites and the imperialist forces of blocking progressive and emancipatory political and socio-economic transformation in Pakistan. Therefore, the paper argues that an effective counter-hegemonic project against imperialism needs to incorporate strategies of progressive radical transformation of a dominated country.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
明确的帝国主义在巴基斯坦:“战略”和“依赖”修复的辩证法
在对帝国主义的分析中,外围国家内部政治经济因素的作用往往在很大程度上保持沉默。为了纠正这一点,本文在后殖民国家巴基斯坦的背景下提出了帝国主义的明确概念,强调了国内政治经济因素在调解和规范帝国主义政治解决方案中的重要性。帝国主义的政治解决是由两个相互关联的过程——战略修复和依赖修复——的结合来调解的“战略修复”是指应对资本主义世界体系核心国家面临的实际或感知的政治、经济和军事挑战,包括领土和资本主义的权力逻辑。然而,“依赖修复”是为了防止占主导地位的国家(如巴基斯坦)进行激进的渐进式重组,以确保国内精英享有有利的社会经济秩序。将帝国主义统治视为战略和依赖解决方案的辩证法,其关键含义之一是,它使巴基斯坦统治精英和阻止巴基斯坦进步和解放政治和社会经济转型的帝国主义势力的共同利益显而易见。因此,本文认为,一个有效的反对帝国主义的反霸权主义项目需要纳入对一个被统治国家进行渐进式彻底改造的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Labor and Society
Journal of Labor and Society INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
You Won’t Break My Soul: Black Women’s Contemporary Anti-Work Philosophies and Post-Work Experiences Gramsci, Polanyi and the Labor Politics of Social Protection The Centrality of the Workplace and Class Consciousness in the US South: The New Orleans Community Studies Improving Labour Laws in Ghana: An Analysis of Collective Bargaining Agreements Female Gazes in the Communist Movement: Women Photographers in the Interwar Period and World War ii
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1