Rana Yamout, M. Viallard, Samer Hoteit, H. Abou-Zeid, F. Shebbo, N. Naccache
{"title":"Does the addition of dexmedetomidine to morphine have any clinical benefit on the treatment of pain in patients with metastatic cancer? A pilot study","authors":"Rana Yamout, M. Viallard, Samer Hoteit, H. Abou-Zeid, F. Shebbo, N. Naccache","doi":"10.1080/09699260.2021.1919045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Morphine is the first line drug for moderate to severe pain; however, due to side effects it may contribute to discomfort. Dexmedetomidine has both sedative and analgesic actions with a morphine sparing effect and can be used in metastatic cancer patients with intractable pain. This pilot project primarily aims to evaluate the effect of dexmedetomidine on pain treatment in patients with metastatic cancer. In addition, the work aims to determine its impact on anxiety and quality of communication of patients with their family members. Patients between 18 and 75 years, with metastatic cancer, who failed multiple pain treatments at home and admitted to the hospital for pain management were included. Patients were allocated randomly to Group A (who received morphine plus normal saline solution) or Group B (who received morphine plus dexmedetomidine) for pain management. The Visual Analogue Score (VAS) was used to assess pain intensity, a 5-point sedation scale was used to assess sedation level, and the Hamilton scale was used to assess anxiety. Results have shown that morphine consumption was reduced at different time points up to 48 h, p < 0.005 in both groups. There was a trend in decreasing pain scores after 36 h in both groups. All patients in Group A required rescue pain treatment; however, in Group B, this percentage was lower (67%). Communication was better in patients allocated to Group B than patients in Group A. To conclude, dexmedetomidine was safe and has exerted an opioid-sparing effect in patients with metastatic cancer with keeping their anxiety levels within an acceptable range.","PeriodicalId":45106,"journal":{"name":"PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09699260.2021.1919045","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09699260.2021.1919045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Morphine is the first line drug for moderate to severe pain; however, due to side effects it may contribute to discomfort. Dexmedetomidine has both sedative and analgesic actions with a morphine sparing effect and can be used in metastatic cancer patients with intractable pain. This pilot project primarily aims to evaluate the effect of dexmedetomidine on pain treatment in patients with metastatic cancer. In addition, the work aims to determine its impact on anxiety and quality of communication of patients with their family members. Patients between 18 and 75 years, with metastatic cancer, who failed multiple pain treatments at home and admitted to the hospital for pain management were included. Patients were allocated randomly to Group A (who received morphine plus normal saline solution) or Group B (who received morphine plus dexmedetomidine) for pain management. The Visual Analogue Score (VAS) was used to assess pain intensity, a 5-point sedation scale was used to assess sedation level, and the Hamilton scale was used to assess anxiety. Results have shown that morphine consumption was reduced at different time points up to 48 h, p < 0.005 in both groups. There was a trend in decreasing pain scores after 36 h in both groups. All patients in Group A required rescue pain treatment; however, in Group B, this percentage was lower (67%). Communication was better in patients allocated to Group B than patients in Group A. To conclude, dexmedetomidine was safe and has exerted an opioid-sparing effect in patients with metastatic cancer with keeping their anxiety levels within an acceptable range.
期刊介绍:
Progress in Palliative Care is a peer reviewed, multidisciplinary journal with an international perspective. It provides a central point of reference for all members of the palliative care community: medical consultants, nurses, hospital support teams, home care teams, hospice directors and administrators, pain centre staff, social workers, chaplains, counsellors, information staff, paramedical staff and self-help groups. The emphasis of the journal is on the rapid exchange of information amongst those working in palliative care. Progress in Palliative Care embraces all aspects of the management of the problems of end-stage disease.