Does the addition of dexmedetomidine to morphine have any clinical benefit on the treatment of pain in patients with metastatic cancer? A pilot study

IF 0.9 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE Pub Date : 2021-05-03 DOI:10.1080/09699260.2021.1919045
Rana Yamout, M. Viallard, Samer Hoteit, H. Abou-Zeid, F. Shebbo, N. Naccache
{"title":"Does the addition of dexmedetomidine to morphine have any clinical benefit on the treatment of pain in patients with metastatic cancer? A pilot study","authors":"Rana Yamout, M. Viallard, Samer Hoteit, H. Abou-Zeid, F. Shebbo, N. Naccache","doi":"10.1080/09699260.2021.1919045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Morphine is the first line drug for moderate to severe pain; however, due to side effects it may contribute to discomfort. Dexmedetomidine has both sedative and analgesic actions with a morphine sparing effect and can be used in metastatic cancer patients with intractable pain. This pilot project primarily aims to evaluate the effect of dexmedetomidine on pain treatment in patients with metastatic cancer. In addition, the work aims to determine its impact on anxiety and quality of communication of patients with their family members. Patients between 18 and 75 years, with metastatic cancer, who failed multiple pain treatments at home and admitted to the hospital for pain management were included. Patients were allocated randomly to Group A (who received morphine plus normal saline solution) or Group B (who received morphine plus dexmedetomidine) for pain management. The Visual Analogue Score (VAS) was used to assess pain intensity, a 5-point sedation scale was used to assess sedation level, and the Hamilton scale was used to assess anxiety. Results have shown that morphine consumption was reduced at different time points up to 48 h, p < 0.005 in both groups. There was a trend in decreasing pain scores after 36 h in both groups. All patients in Group A required rescue pain treatment; however, in Group B, this percentage was lower (67%). Communication was better in patients allocated to Group B than patients in Group A. To conclude, dexmedetomidine was safe and has exerted an opioid-sparing effect in patients with metastatic cancer with keeping their anxiety levels within an acceptable range.","PeriodicalId":45106,"journal":{"name":"PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09699260.2021.1919045","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09699260.2021.1919045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Morphine is the first line drug for moderate to severe pain; however, due to side effects it may contribute to discomfort. Dexmedetomidine has both sedative and analgesic actions with a morphine sparing effect and can be used in metastatic cancer patients with intractable pain. This pilot project primarily aims to evaluate the effect of dexmedetomidine on pain treatment in patients with metastatic cancer. In addition, the work aims to determine its impact on anxiety and quality of communication of patients with their family members. Patients between 18 and 75 years, with metastatic cancer, who failed multiple pain treatments at home and admitted to the hospital for pain management were included. Patients were allocated randomly to Group A (who received morphine plus normal saline solution) or Group B (who received morphine plus dexmedetomidine) for pain management. The Visual Analogue Score (VAS) was used to assess pain intensity, a 5-point sedation scale was used to assess sedation level, and the Hamilton scale was used to assess anxiety. Results have shown that morphine consumption was reduced at different time points up to 48 h, p < 0.005 in both groups. There was a trend in decreasing pain scores after 36 h in both groups. All patients in Group A required rescue pain treatment; however, in Group B, this percentage was lower (67%). Communication was better in patients allocated to Group B than patients in Group A. To conclude, dexmedetomidine was safe and has exerted an opioid-sparing effect in patients with metastatic cancer with keeping their anxiety levels within an acceptable range.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
右美托咪定加入吗啡治疗转移性癌症患者疼痛是否有任何临床益处?一项初步研究
吗啡是治疗中度至重度疼痛的一线药物;然而,由于副作用,它可能会导致不适。右美托咪定具有镇静和镇痛作用,并具有吗啡保留作用,可用于转移性癌症顽固性疼痛患者。该试验项目主要旨在评估右美托咪定对转移性癌症患者疼痛治疗的效果。此外,这项工作旨在确定其对患者及其家人的焦虑和沟通质量的影响。包括18至75岁的转移性癌症患者,他们在家中多次疼痛治疗失败并入院进行疼痛管理。患者被随机分为A组(接受吗啡加生理盐水)或B组(接受海洛因加右美托咪定)进行疼痛管理。视觉模拟评分(VAS)用于评估疼痛强度,5点镇静评分用于评估镇静水平,汉密尔顿评分用于评估焦虑。结果表明,吗啡的消耗量在不同的时间点减少,直到48小时,p < 0.005。36小时后,两组的疼痛评分均呈下降趋势。A组所有患者均需抢救性疼痛治疗;然而,在B组,这一比例较低(67%)。与A组患者相比,B组患者的沟通更好。总之,右美托咪定是安全的,并在转移性癌症患者中发挥了阿片类药物保留作用,使他们的焦虑水平保持在可接受的范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE
PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Progress in Palliative Care is a peer reviewed, multidisciplinary journal with an international perspective. It provides a central point of reference for all members of the palliative care community: medical consultants, nurses, hospital support teams, home care teams, hospice directors and administrators, pain centre staff, social workers, chaplains, counsellors, information staff, paramedical staff and self-help groups. The emphasis of the journal is on the rapid exchange of information amongst those working in palliative care. Progress in Palliative Care embraces all aspects of the management of the problems of end-stage disease.
期刊最新文献
The impact of COVID-19 and community services on palliative care unit admissions: A retrospective cohort study A qualitative evidence synthesis exploring the attitudes, beliefs and values of the long-term care workforce towards palliative care Evidence-based physiotherapy interventions: evaluation of current practice in a palliative care service Feasibility and economic benefits of community-based palliative care in regional Australia: A case study with cost analysis Exploring the competency and confidence levels of physiotherapists in the management of patients diagnosed with life-limiting illnesses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1