The apartheid and racism campaigns - the NGO contribution to antisemitism

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 Q3 AREA STUDIES Israel Affairs Pub Date : 2022-12-28 DOI:10.1080/13537121.2023.2162256
G. Steinberg
{"title":"The apartheid and racism campaigns - the NGO contribution to antisemitism","authors":"G. Steinberg","doi":"10.1080/13537121.2023.2162256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Under the headings of promoting human rights and international law, the influential network of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) has been a central actor in the political war targeting Israel though allegations of apartheid and racism. In applying these slanders, the NGOs systematically erase the history of the Arab-Israeli conflict, including decades of warfare and terrorism, and join in the attempt to delegitimize the nation-state of the Jewish people, regardless of borders, and as distinct from criticism of Israeli policies regarding territory occupied in the 1967 war. This process constitutes the essence of post-Holocaust or ‘new antisemitism’, as included in the consensus working definition published by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance. The NGO campaigns are constructed on the foundations established by the Soviet and Islamic blocs culminating in the 1975 UN ‘Zionism is racism’ resolution. This theme was revived in the NGO Forum of the 2001 Durban Conference, led by Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and Palestinian groups such as Al-Haq, and used to justify appropriating the methods of the South African anti-apartheid campaign, including boycotts and lawfare. After the Durban conference and for 20 years since, this NGO network continued and expanded the campaign based on the apartheid and racism allegations. Their claims were amplified in media platforms, international bodies, anti-Israel church groups and on university campuses in the form of ‘Israel apartheid weeks’. European governments enabled activities of the Palestinian and Israeli NGOs through substantial funding, estimated at 120 million Euros annually. In 2020 and 2021, the NGO emphasis on these themes increased, led by HRW, and supporting the decision of the ICC prosecutor to accept jurisdiction over Palestinian claims and to open investigations against Israel. This context amplified the potency of the allegations of apartheid and racism in attempts to demonise Israel.","PeriodicalId":45036,"journal":{"name":"Israel Affairs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13537121.2023.2162256","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Under the headings of promoting human rights and international law, the influential network of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) has been a central actor in the political war targeting Israel though allegations of apartheid and racism. In applying these slanders, the NGOs systematically erase the history of the Arab-Israeli conflict, including decades of warfare and terrorism, and join in the attempt to delegitimize the nation-state of the Jewish people, regardless of borders, and as distinct from criticism of Israeli policies regarding territory occupied in the 1967 war. This process constitutes the essence of post-Holocaust or ‘new antisemitism’, as included in the consensus working definition published by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance. The NGO campaigns are constructed on the foundations established by the Soviet and Islamic blocs culminating in the 1975 UN ‘Zionism is racism’ resolution. This theme was revived in the NGO Forum of the 2001 Durban Conference, led by Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and Palestinian groups such as Al-Haq, and used to justify appropriating the methods of the South African anti-apartheid campaign, including boycotts and lawfare. After the Durban conference and for 20 years since, this NGO network continued and expanded the campaign based on the apartheid and racism allegations. Their claims were amplified in media platforms, international bodies, anti-Israel church groups and on university campuses in the form of ‘Israel apartheid weeks’. European governments enabled activities of the Palestinian and Israeli NGOs through substantial funding, estimated at 120 million Euros annually. In 2020 and 2021, the NGO emphasis on these themes increased, led by HRW, and supporting the decision of the ICC prosecutor to accept jurisdiction over Palestinian claims and to open investigations against Israel. This context amplified the potency of the allegations of apartheid and racism in attempts to demonise Israel.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
种族隔离和种族主义运动-非政府组织对反犹主义的贡献
摘要在促进人权和国际法的标题下,有影响力的非政府组织网络一直是针对以色列的政治战争的核心参与者,尽管有种族隔离和种族主义的指控。通过使用这些诽谤,非政府组织系统地抹去了阿以冲突的历史,包括几十年的战争和恐怖主义,并加入了剥夺犹太人民民族国家合法性的企图,无论其边界如何,这与对以色列在1967年战争中占领领土政策的批评截然不同。这一过程构成了大屠杀后或“新反犹太主义”的本质,正如国际大屠杀纪念联盟公布的协商一致工作定义所包含的那样。非政府组织的运动建立在苏联和伊斯兰集团建立的基础上,1975年联合国通过了“犹太复国主义就是种族主义”决议。这一主题在人权观察、大赦国际和Al-Haq等巴勒斯坦团体领导的2001年德班会议非政府组织论坛上得到了重申,并被用来为挪用南非反伙伴运动的方法,包括抵制和法律战辩护。德班会议之后以及此后的20年里,这个非政府组织网络继续并扩大了基于种族隔离和种族主义指控的运动。他们的说法在媒体平台、国际机构、反以色列教会团体和大学校园里以“以色列种族隔离周”的形式被放大。欧洲各国政府通过每年估计1.2亿欧元的大量资金,支持巴勒斯坦和以色列非政府组织的活动。2020年和2021年,在人权观察的领导下,非政府组织对这些主题的重视程度有所提高,并支持国际刑事法院检察官接受对巴勒斯坦索赔的管辖权并对以色列展开调查的决定。这一背景放大了种族隔离和种族主义指控的威力,企图妖魔化以色列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Israel Affairs
Israel Affairs AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Whether your major interest is Israeli history or politics, literature or art, strategic affairs or economics, the Arab-Israeli conflict or Israel-diaspora relations, you will find articles and reviews that are incisive and contain even-handed analysis of the country and its problems in every issue of Israel Affairs, an international multidisciplinary journal. Scholarly and authoritative, yet straightforward and accessible, Israel Affairs aims to serve as a means of communication between the various communities interested in Israel: academics, policy-makers, practitioners, journalists and the informed public.
期刊最新文献
‘Retirement home’ or ‘symbol of purity and nobility’? David Ben-Gurion’s changing perception of the Israeli presidency The gender wage gap in Israel: evidence from PIAAC data Israeli tech entrepreneurship: glorification of business exits in the media Ontological security-seeking in Turkish–Israeli relations: prospects and challenges of normalisation Can ‘the whole world’ be wrong?: lethal journalism, antisemitism and global jihad Can ‘the whole world’ be wrong?: lethal journalism, antisemitism and global jihad , by Richard Landes, Boston, Academic Studies Press, 2022, xxvi+523 pp., $149 (hardback), ISBN 978-1-64469-640-8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1