Executive Functions and English Reading Comprehension among Filipino Students

IF 1.2 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Reading Psychology Pub Date : 2022-12-21 DOI:10.1080/02702711.2022.2156950
Glenda Darlene V. Garcia
{"title":"Executive Functions and English Reading Comprehension among Filipino Students","authors":"Glenda Darlene V. Garcia","doi":"10.1080/02702711.2022.2156950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Recent studies have proposed developments to the Simple View of Reading to reflect reading development across age groups and differences among learner profiles and account for additional factors that explain reading comprehension performance beyond word recognition and language comprehension. One of these proposals is the inclusion of cognitive processes such as executive functions in the model. In the current study, the generalizability of SVR and the role of executive functions in reading comprehension are evaluated through the participation of a less researched population, bilingual Filipino learners ages 9 to 14 who have learned Filipino and English at home and in school. The study utilized behavior ratings to measure executive functions and standardized tests to assess word recognition, language comprehension, and reading comprehension. It also included a researcher-made tool to evaluate comprehension of expository texts specifically. Partial correlation analyses reveal that only language comprehension is significantly associated with reading comprehension as measured by the standardized tool. Regression analyses show that while executive functions shared variance with word recognition and language comprehension in predicting reading comprehension, they were not found to have a significant direct effect on reading comprehension beyond the two traditional measures of reading. The results highlight the role of language throughout late childhood and early adolescence among skilled readers and suggest that integration of executive functions in classroom instruction may not be as advantageous as desired for learners with no issues with the cognitive control processes.","PeriodicalId":46567,"journal":{"name":"Reading Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2022.2156950","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Recent studies have proposed developments to the Simple View of Reading to reflect reading development across age groups and differences among learner profiles and account for additional factors that explain reading comprehension performance beyond word recognition and language comprehension. One of these proposals is the inclusion of cognitive processes such as executive functions in the model. In the current study, the generalizability of SVR and the role of executive functions in reading comprehension are evaluated through the participation of a less researched population, bilingual Filipino learners ages 9 to 14 who have learned Filipino and English at home and in school. The study utilized behavior ratings to measure executive functions and standardized tests to assess word recognition, language comprehension, and reading comprehension. It also included a researcher-made tool to evaluate comprehension of expository texts specifically. Partial correlation analyses reveal that only language comprehension is significantly associated with reading comprehension as measured by the standardized tool. Regression analyses show that while executive functions shared variance with word recognition and language comprehension in predicting reading comprehension, they were not found to have a significant direct effect on reading comprehension beyond the two traditional measures of reading. The results highlight the role of language throughout late childhood and early adolescence among skilled readers and suggest that integration of executive functions in classroom instruction may not be as advantageous as desired for learners with no issues with the cognitive control processes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
菲律宾学生的执行功能与英语阅读理解
最近的研究提出了对简单阅读观的发展,以反映不同年龄组的阅读发展和学习者特征的差异,并解释单词识别和语言理解之外的阅读理解表现的其他因素。其中一个建议是将执行功能等认知过程纳入模型。在本研究中,本研究通过研究较少的9至14岁的菲律宾双语学习者的参与来评估SVR的泛化性和执行功能在阅读理解中的作用,这些学习者在家里和学校学习菲律宾语和英语。该研究使用行为评分来衡量执行功能,并使用标准化测试来评估单词识别、语言理解和阅读理解。它还包括一个研究人员制作的工具来评估对说明文的理解。偏相关分析显示,只有语言理解与阅读理解显著相关。回归分析表明,虽然执行功能在预测阅读理解方面与单词识别和语言理解有共同的差异,但在这两个传统的阅读指标之外,执行功能对阅读理解没有显著的直接影响。研究结果强调了语言在熟练读者的童年晚期和青春期早期的作用,并表明课堂教学中执行功能的整合可能并不像没有认知控制过程问题的学习者所期望的那样有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reading Psychology
Reading Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Prepared exclusively by professionals, this refereed journal publishes original manuscripts in the fields of literacy, reading, and related psychology disciplines. Articles appear in the form of completed research; practitioner-based "experiential" methods or philosophical statements; teacher and counselor preparation services for guiding all levels of reading skill development, attitudes, and interests; programs or materials; and literary or humorous contributions.
期刊最新文献
Unhinged: Reading Comprehension Tests as Gatekeepers to Teaching The Regularity of High-Frequency Words (Sight Words): Teacher Phonetic Knowledge is Key Investigating the Mechanisms Behind Relations Between Academic Language and Reading Comprehension: The Role of Reading Self-Concept and Reading Enjoyment An Exploration of the Impact of Quality Illustrations in Children’s Picture Books on Preschool Student Narrative Ability Metalinguistic Effects on English Spelling: A Structural Equation Model for Early Literacy Instruction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1