The Communication Coefficient Method: A New Faculty Grading Tool Designed to Help Engineering Students Improve Their Technical Communication

IF 1.6 2区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Pub Date : 2023-03-08 DOI:10.1109/TPC.2023.3260479
Edward Londner;Matthew Dabkowski;Ian Kloo;J. D. Caddell
{"title":"The Communication Coefficient Method: A New Faculty Grading Tool Designed to Help Engineering Students Improve Their Technical Communication","authors":"Edward Londner;Matthew Dabkowski;Ian Kloo;J. D. Caddell","doi":"10.1109/TPC.2023.3260479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<bold>Introduction:</b>\n Engineering students benefit from understanding the role of technical communication in the professional workplace. This article examines the communication coefficient (CC), a new method for grading student technical communication intended to help students better understand this role. Its goal is to encourage students to treat their communication with the same importance that it has in the professional workplace. \n<bold>About the case:</b>\n The core philosophy of the CC method is that audiences perceive technical work more positively when it is communicated well and more negatively when it is not. The method captures this philosophy mathematically: students’ grades result from multiplying the points earned for technical content by a number—the coefficient—representing how well they communicated that content. \n<bold>Situating the case:</b>\n The CC method is rooted in established principles, such as holistic grading and the separate yet simultaneous consideration of content and communication. It is novel in how it combines these principles into a grading technique. \n<bold>Approach:</b>\n The CC method was employed in three undergraduate engineering classes at the United States Military Academy during the spring 2020 semester. Student and instructor feedback were collected to gauge the pros and cons of the method and whether it is worth fielding on a larger scale. \n<bold>Discussion:</b>\n The CC method was found to encourage better student communication, although mixed student and instructor opinion suggest that changes to the method and the way that it is messaged are necessary. \n<bold>Conclusion:</b>\n The CC method warrants further study and consideration of its usefulness in other departments and institutions.","PeriodicalId":46950,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication","volume":"66 2","pages":"202-219"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel7/47/10132022/10121177.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10121177/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Engineering students benefit from understanding the role of technical communication in the professional workplace. This article examines the communication coefficient (CC), a new method for grading student technical communication intended to help students better understand this role. Its goal is to encourage students to treat their communication with the same importance that it has in the professional workplace. About the case: The core philosophy of the CC method is that audiences perceive technical work more positively when it is communicated well and more negatively when it is not. The method captures this philosophy mathematically: students’ grades result from multiplying the points earned for technical content by a number—the coefficient—representing how well they communicated that content. Situating the case: The CC method is rooted in established principles, such as holistic grading and the separate yet simultaneous consideration of content and communication. It is novel in how it combines these principles into a grading technique. Approach: The CC method was employed in three undergraduate engineering classes at the United States Military Academy during the spring 2020 semester. Student and instructor feedback were collected to gauge the pros and cons of the method and whether it is worth fielding on a larger scale. Discussion: The CC method was found to encourage better student communication, although mixed student and instructor opinion suggest that changes to the method and the way that it is messaged are necessary. Conclusion: The CC method warrants further study and consideration of its usefulness in other departments and institutions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沟通系数法:一种新的教师评分工具,旨在帮助工程专业学生提高技术沟通能力
导言:工科学生从理解技术交流在专业工作场所的作用中受益。本文探讨了沟通系数(CC),这是一种为学生技术沟通评分的新方法,旨在帮助学生更好地理解这一角色。它的目标是鼓励学生对待他们的沟通与在专业工作场所一样重要。关于案例:CC方法的核心理念是,当技术工作沟通良好时,受众会更积极地看待它,而当技术工作沟通不好时,受众会更消极地看待它。这种方法以数学的方式抓住了这一哲学:学生的成绩是用技术内容的得分乘以一个数字——系数——来表示他们对该内容的交流程度。情境分析:CC方法植根于既定的原则,例如整体评分和内容与传播的分离但同时考虑。它的新颖之处在于它如何将这些原则结合成一种评分技术。方法:在美国军事学院2020年春季学期的三个本科工程班级中采用CC方法。收集了学生和教师的反馈,以评估该方法的利弊,以及是否值得在更大范围内推广。讨论:CC方法被发现可以鼓励更好的学生交流,尽管学生和教师的意见不一,表明改变方法和传递信息的方式是必要的。结论:CC法在其他部门和机构的适用性值得进一步研究和考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to applied research on professional communication—including but not limited to technical and business communication. Papers should address the research interests and needs of technical communicators, engineers, scientists, information designers, editors, linguists, translators, managers, business professionals, and others from around the globe who practice, conduct research on, and teach others about effective professional communication. The Transactions publishes original, empirical research that addresses one of these contexts: The communication practices of technical professionals, such as engineers and scientists The practices of professional communicators who work in technical or business environments Evidence-based methods for teaching and practicing professional and technical communication.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents IEEE Professional Communication Society Information IEEE Professional Communication Society Information IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Information for Authors Getting it Wrong: Student Estimations of Time and the Number of Drafts in Linked Computer Science and Technical Communication Courses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1