Creating resident shift schedules under multiple objectives by generating and evaluating the Pareto frontier

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Operations Research for Health Care Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.orhc.2018.08.001
Young-Chae Hong , Amy Cohn , Marina A. Epelman , Aviva Alpert
{"title":"Creating resident shift schedules under multiple objectives by generating and evaluating the Pareto frontier","authors":"Young-Chae Hong ,&nbsp;Amy Cohn ,&nbsp;Marina A. Epelman ,&nbsp;Aviva Alpert","doi":"10.1016/j.orhc.2018.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Creating shift schedules for medical residents is challenging, not only because of the large number of conflicting rules and requirements needed to ensure both adequate patient care and resident educational opportunities, but also because there is no one clear, well-defined single objective function to optimize. Instead, many factors should be taken into account when selecting the “best” schedule. In our practical experience, it is impossible for the scheduler (typically, a Chief Resident) to accurately determine weights that would allow these factors to be captured in a mathematical objective function that truly represented their preferences. We therefore propose to instead provide the Chief with a set of Pareto-dominant schedules from which to select. We present an integer programming-based approach embedded within a recursive algorithm to generate these schedules. We then present both computational results to assess the tractability of our approach and a case study, based on a real-world scheduling problem at the University of Michigan Pediatric </span>Emergency Department, to study how a Chief Resident would evaluate the Pareto set.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46320,"journal":{"name":"Operations Research for Health Care","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100170"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.orhc.2018.08.001","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operations Research for Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211692317301467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Creating shift schedules for medical residents is challenging, not only because of the large number of conflicting rules and requirements needed to ensure both adequate patient care and resident educational opportunities, but also because there is no one clear, well-defined single objective function to optimize. Instead, many factors should be taken into account when selecting the “best” schedule. In our practical experience, it is impossible for the scheduler (typically, a Chief Resident) to accurately determine weights that would allow these factors to be captured in a mathematical objective function that truly represented their preferences. We therefore propose to instead provide the Chief with a set of Pareto-dominant schedules from which to select. We present an integer programming-based approach embedded within a recursive algorithm to generate these schedules. We then present both computational results to assess the tractability of our approach and a case study, based on a real-world scheduling problem at the University of Michigan Pediatric Emergency Department, to study how a Chief Resident would evaluate the Pareto set.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过生成和评估帕累托边界,创建多目标下的居民轮班时间表
为住院医生制定轮班时间表是一项挑战,不仅因为要确保足够的病人护理和住院医生教育机会需要大量相互冲突的规则和要求,而且还因为没有一个明确、定义良好的单一目标函数来优化。相反,在选择“最佳”时间表时,应该考虑许多因素。在我们的实践经验中,调度器(通常是首席住院医师)不可能准确地确定权重,以使这些因素能够在真正表示其偏好的数学目标函数中被捕获。因此,我们建议为首席提供一套帕累托支配的时间表供其选择。我们提出了一种基于整数规划的方法,嵌入递归算法来生成这些时间表。然后,我们给出了计算结果来评估我们的方法的可追溯性,并给出了一个基于密歇根大学儿科急诊科实际调度问题的案例研究,以研究总住院医师如何评估帕累托集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Operations Research for Health Care
Operations Research for Health Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Preference-based allocation of patients to nursing homes Balancing continuity of care and home care schedule costs using blueprint routes Outpatient appointment systems: A new heuristic with patient classification A modeling framework for evaluating proactive and reactive nurse rostering strategies — A case study from a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1