Comparison of Early Maladaptive Schemas and Metacognitive Beliefs between the Students with Social Phobia and the ones with no Psychiatric Problems

Boshra Mohammadi, Neda Ali Beige
{"title":"Comparison of Early Maladaptive Schemas and Metacognitive Beliefs between the Students with Social Phobia and the ones with no Psychiatric Problems","authors":"Boshra Mohammadi, Neda Ali Beige","doi":"10.5812/RIJM.12689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Researchers believe that the early maladaptive schemas act as refiners to approve the childhood’s experiences and will lead to some clinical symptoms like anxiety, depression, phobia, personality disorders, alcohol abuse, overeating or stomach ulcers. Objectives: The present study was carried out with the purpose of comparing early maladaptive schemas and metacognitive beliefs between the students with social phobia and the ones with no psychiatric problems in the universities of Tehran. Methods: The statistical population included all the patients referred to the therapeutic, psychiatric, psychological and consultative centers of Tehran in 2015. The causal-comparative methodology was employed and 60 students with social phobia and 60 students with no psychiatric problems were selected as the samples of the study using the convenience (targeted) sampling method. Young schema questionnaire, Conover metacognitive beliefs and social phobia were employed for data collection. The research data were analyzed using multivariable analysis of variance (MANOVA) test. Results: The obtained results showed that there was a significant difference between the students with social phobia and the ones with no psychiatric problems in terms of early maladaptive schemas and metacognitive beliefs (P < 0.01). Conclusions: It can be stated that the early maladaptive schemas have been less inefficient among the students with social phobia.","PeriodicalId":20994,"journal":{"name":"Razavi International Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Razavi International Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/RIJM.12689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Researchers believe that the early maladaptive schemas act as refiners to approve the childhood’s experiences and will lead to some clinical symptoms like anxiety, depression, phobia, personality disorders, alcohol abuse, overeating or stomach ulcers. Objectives: The present study was carried out with the purpose of comparing early maladaptive schemas and metacognitive beliefs between the students with social phobia and the ones with no psychiatric problems in the universities of Tehran. Methods: The statistical population included all the patients referred to the therapeutic, psychiatric, psychological and consultative centers of Tehran in 2015. The causal-comparative methodology was employed and 60 students with social phobia and 60 students with no psychiatric problems were selected as the samples of the study using the convenience (targeted) sampling method. Young schema questionnaire, Conover metacognitive beliefs and social phobia were employed for data collection. The research data were analyzed using multivariable analysis of variance (MANOVA) test. Results: The obtained results showed that there was a significant difference between the students with social phobia and the ones with no psychiatric problems in terms of early maladaptive schemas and metacognitive beliefs (P < 0.01). Conclusions: It can be stated that the early maladaptive schemas have been less inefficient among the students with social phobia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社交恐惧症学生与无心理问题学生早期适应不良图式和元认知信念的比较
背景:研究人员认为,早期的适应不良模式对儿童时期的经历起到了精炼剂的作用,并会导致一些临床症状,如焦虑、抑郁、恐惧症、人格障碍、酗酒、暴饮暴食或胃溃疡。目的:比较德黑兰大学社交恐惧症学生与无心理问题学生的早期适应不良图式和元认知信念。方法:统计人群包括2015年在德黑兰治疗、精神、心理和咨询中心转诊的所有患者。采用因果比较方法,采用方便(目标)抽样法,选取60名有社交恐惧症的学生和60名无精神问题的学生作为研究样本。采用青年图式问卷、Conover元认知信念和社交恐惧症问卷进行数据收集。研究资料采用多变量方差分析(MANOVA)检验进行分析。结果:社交恐惧症学生在早期适应不良图式和元认知信念方面与无精神问题学生有显著差异(P < 0.01)。结论:社交恐惧症学生的早期适应不良图式效率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Razavi International Journal of Medicine aims at publishing the high quality materials, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of Medicine and medical sciences. The Razavi International Journal of Medicine is an international, English language, peer-reviewed, open access, free access journal dealing with general Medicine and medical sciences, clinical and basic studies, public health, Disaster Medicine and Health Policy. It is an official Journal of the education and research department, Razavi Hospital and is published quarterly.
期刊最新文献
The evaluation of metabolic syndrome in patients diagnosed with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): a cross-sectional study of Iranian population Investigation of the Mediating Role of Academic Self-Efficacy in the Relationship of Social Adjustment with Academic Engagement and Achievement Goals Among High School Students Comparison of the Effect of Lazarus Multimodal Approach and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy on Psychological Distress, Working Memory, and Anxiety in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis The Effectiveness of Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention Based on Psychological Capitals on the Experience Avoidance and Suicidal ideations in Female Victims of Domestic Violence The Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on Depression, Anxiety, and Stress in Nulliparous Pregnant Women
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1