Puritan Spirits in the Abolitionist Imagination by Kenyon Gradert, and: Selling Antislavery: Abolition and Mass Media in Antebellum Culture by Teresa A. Goddu (review)

IF 0.3 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN AFRICAN AMERICAN REVIEW Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1353/afa.2023.a903615
Robert Fanuzzi
{"title":"Puritan Spirits in the Abolitionist Imagination by Kenyon Gradert, and: Selling Antislavery: Abolition and Mass Media in Antebellum Culture by Teresa A. Goddu (review)","authors":"Robert Fanuzzi","doi":"10.1353/afa.2023.a903615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Helwig’s analysis of cross-racial solidarity focuses in particular on passages such as the reaction to the Fugitive Slave Act in Lippard’s last novella, Eleanor (1854): “Black Slavery is the very embodiment of all the evils of White Slavery, multiplied ad infinitum; the great Sum of all the villainies and tyrannies that ever existed beneath the Sun” (98-99). While Helwig integrates both antebellum and contemporary critiques of the reality of cross-racial solidarity in his study (84, 98, 153), his book falls on the optimistic side in its assessment of the extent of this solidarity. Helwig frames his monograph, somewhat infelicitously in methodological terms, as a revisionist project that seeks to correct the historiographic “meta-narrative” of the “white working class as a politically reactionary and racist monolith” (5), an idea that he sees as informing such scholarship as David Roediger’s seminal work on The Wages of Whiteness (1991). Helwig’s argument focuses on the fraught analogy between “Northern ‘wage slavery’ and Southern chattel slavery” (8), an analogy that Roediger discussed in detail, pointing out that the term “wage slavery” was far less common in the antebellum era than “white slavery.” Roediger offers a more nuanced examination of what W. E. B. Du Bois had identified as the “public and psychological wage” of white workers in Black Reconstruction in America, 1860-1880 (1935) than Helwig’s summative reference to the “white working class as a politically reactionary and racist monolith” suggests (5). In a context in which Black Lives Matter coexists with Trumpism, such a scholarly debate has political implications that Helwig does not address directly. The structural relationship between race and class remains undertheorized in contrast to individual moral and ethical quandaries that are discussed with great nuance. The issue of the interconnections between Southern chattel slavery and Northern wage labor forms the core of the debate over the “New History of Capitalism,” whose proponents (e.g., Sven Beckert’s Empire of Cotton, 2014; Edward Baptist’s The Half Has Never Been Told, 2014) argue that the production of raw cotton by enslaved African Americans in the South played a crucial role in the emergence of modern-day globalized capitalism. Within the field of antebellum American literature, Helwig’s book advances research on George Lippard’s work in particular. In analyses that should interest specialists in antebellum city mysteries, the monograph also contributes to the study of the early African American novel and the cultural relevance of reviewing to the papers edited by Frederick Douglass. For the many questions it raises, Helwig’s book thus makes an important contribution to the study of antebellum American literature and will invite much follow-up research. It poses anew the question of the role of literature in cross-racial solidarity and investigates its social limits, imaginary conditions, and political potential in antebellum America.","PeriodicalId":44779,"journal":{"name":"AFRICAN AMERICAN REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AFRICAN AMERICAN REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/afa.2023.a903615","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Helwig’s analysis of cross-racial solidarity focuses in particular on passages such as the reaction to the Fugitive Slave Act in Lippard’s last novella, Eleanor (1854): “Black Slavery is the very embodiment of all the evils of White Slavery, multiplied ad infinitum; the great Sum of all the villainies and tyrannies that ever existed beneath the Sun” (98-99). While Helwig integrates both antebellum and contemporary critiques of the reality of cross-racial solidarity in his study (84, 98, 153), his book falls on the optimistic side in its assessment of the extent of this solidarity. Helwig frames his monograph, somewhat infelicitously in methodological terms, as a revisionist project that seeks to correct the historiographic “meta-narrative” of the “white working class as a politically reactionary and racist monolith” (5), an idea that he sees as informing such scholarship as David Roediger’s seminal work on The Wages of Whiteness (1991). Helwig’s argument focuses on the fraught analogy between “Northern ‘wage slavery’ and Southern chattel slavery” (8), an analogy that Roediger discussed in detail, pointing out that the term “wage slavery” was far less common in the antebellum era than “white slavery.” Roediger offers a more nuanced examination of what W. E. B. Du Bois had identified as the “public and psychological wage” of white workers in Black Reconstruction in America, 1860-1880 (1935) than Helwig’s summative reference to the “white working class as a politically reactionary and racist monolith” suggests (5). In a context in which Black Lives Matter coexists with Trumpism, such a scholarly debate has political implications that Helwig does not address directly. The structural relationship between race and class remains undertheorized in contrast to individual moral and ethical quandaries that are discussed with great nuance. The issue of the interconnections between Southern chattel slavery and Northern wage labor forms the core of the debate over the “New History of Capitalism,” whose proponents (e.g., Sven Beckert’s Empire of Cotton, 2014; Edward Baptist’s The Half Has Never Been Told, 2014) argue that the production of raw cotton by enslaved African Americans in the South played a crucial role in the emergence of modern-day globalized capitalism. Within the field of antebellum American literature, Helwig’s book advances research on George Lippard’s work in particular. In analyses that should interest specialists in antebellum city mysteries, the monograph also contributes to the study of the early African American novel and the cultural relevance of reviewing to the papers edited by Frederick Douglass. For the many questions it raises, Helwig’s book thus makes an important contribution to the study of antebellum American literature and will invite much follow-up research. It poses anew the question of the role of literature in cross-racial solidarity and investigates its social limits, imaginary conditions, and political potential in antebellum America.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
凯尼恩·格拉特的《废奴主义者想象中的清教精神》和特蕾莎·a·高杜的《贩卖反奴隶制:战前文化中的废奴与大众传媒》(书评)
赫尔维格对跨种族团结的分析尤其集中在利帕德的最后一部中篇小说《埃莉诺》(1854)中对《逃亡奴隶法》的反应等段落上:“黑人奴隶制是白人奴隶制所有邪恶的化身,无限倍增;是太阳下所有邪恶和暴政的总和”(98-99)。尽管赫尔维格在他的研究中融合了南北战争前和当代对跨种族团结现实的批评(8498153),但他的书在评估这种团结的程度时却持乐观态度。Helwig将他的专著(在方法论上有点不恰当)描述为一个修正主义项目,试图纠正“白人工人阶级是政治反动和种族主义的庞然大物”的历史“元叙事”(5),他认为这一想法为David Roediger的开创性著作《白人的工资》(1991)等学术提供了信息。Helwig的论点集中在“北方的‘工资奴隶制’和南方的动产奴隶制”(8)之间令人担忧的类比上,Roediger详细讨论了这个类比,指出“工资奴隶制”一词在南北战争前远不如“白人奴隶制”常见。杜波依斯在1860-1880年(1935年)的《美国黑人重建》中认为白人工人的“公共和心理工资”,而赫尔维格总结性地提到“白人工人阶级是政治反动和种族主义的庞然大物”(5)。在“黑人的命也是命”与特朗普主义共存的背景下,这样一场学术辩论具有赫尔维格没有直接提及的政治含义。种族和阶级之间的结构性关系仍然没有得到充分的理论化,与之形成鲜明对比的是,人们对个人的道德和伦理困境进行了细致的讨论。南方动产奴隶制和北方雇佣劳动之间的相互联系问题构成了关于“资本主义新历史”的辩论的核心,其支持者(例如,斯文·贝克特的《棉花帝国》,2014年;爱德华·浸礼会的《一半从未被告知》,2014)认为,南方被奴役的非裔美国人生产原棉在现代全球化资本主义的出现。在南北战争前的美国文学领域,赫尔维格的书尤其推动了对乔治·利帕德作品的研究。在南北战争前城市谜团专家应该感兴趣的分析中,这本专著也有助于研究早期非裔美国人的小说,以及对弗雷德里克·道格拉斯编辑的论文进行评论的文化相关性。尽管这本书提出了许多问题,但它对南北战争前美国文学的研究做出了重要贡献,并将吸引更多的后续研究。它重新提出了文学在跨种族团结中的作用问题,并调查了文学在南北战争前美国的社会局限、想象条件和政治潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AFRICAN AMERICAN REVIEW
AFRICAN AMERICAN REVIEW LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: As the official publication of the Division on Black American Literature and Culture of the Modern Language Association, the quarterly journal African American Review promotes a lively exchange among writers and scholars in the arts, humanities, and social sciences who hold diverse perspectives on African American literature and culture. Between 1967 and 1976, the journal appeared under the title Negro American Literature Forum and for the next fifteen years was titled Black American Literature Forum. In 1992, African American Review changed its name for a third time and expanded its mission to include the study of a broader array of cultural formations.
期刊最新文献
Fighting for the Higher Law: Black and White Transcendentalists against Slavery by Peter Wirzbicki (review) Ralph Ellison: Photographer by Michal Raz-Russo and John F. Callahan (review) I remember My Girl Is a Trip Prospect.5 New Orleans: Yesterday We Said Tomorrow by Naima J. Keith and Diana Nawi (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1