Rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic: What are practitioners to do?

IF 11.5 3区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and Practice Pub Date : 2023-08-31 DOI:10.1017/iop.2023.32

G. V. Barrett, D. Doverspike

引用次数: 1

Abstract

We are responding to Sackett et al. (2023) from the perspective of practitioners who have specialized in high-stakes testing situations, particularly for safety forces, for the last 50 years. Sackett et al. used their data to analyze the results for a six-test battery, which included an integrity measure, conscientiousness, biodata, a structured interview, a situational judgment test (SJT)

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

重新安排泰坦尼克号甲板上的椅子:从业者该怎么做?

我们是从过去50年来专门从事高风险测试情况的从业者的角度对Sackett等人（2023）做出回应的，尤其是安全部队。Sackett等人使用他们的数据分析了六项测试的结果，其中包括完整性测量、责任感、生物数据、结构化访谈、情境判断测试（SJT）

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and Practice PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-

CiteScore

7.70

自引率

10.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and Practice is a peer-reviewed academic journal published on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. The journal focuses on interactive exchanges on topics of importance to the science and practice of the field. It features articles that present new ideas or different takes on existing ideas, stimulating dialogue about important issues in the field. Additionally, the journal is indexed and abstracted in Clarivate Analytics SSCI, Clarivate Analytics Web of Science, European Reference Index for the Humanities and Social Sciences (ERIH PLUS), ProQuest, PsycINFO, and Scopus.

期刊最新文献

Industrial-organizational psychologists and volunteer work Moving boundaries on what I-O has been, and what I-O can be: The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals as an organizing framework Anti-work offers many opportunities for I/O psychologists Best practices for weight at work research Polyculturalism: Diversity incognito or diversity made irrelevant?