Examination of Pre-Service Teachers’ Safety Expectations in The Design of Smartphones in Terms of Various Variables

Q3 Social Sciences Participatory Educational Research Pub Date : 2023-07-06 DOI:10.17275/per.23.60.10.4
Süleyman Burak Tozkoparan, Ferhan Odabaşi
{"title":"Examination of Pre-Service Teachers’ Safety Expectations in The Design of Smartphones in Terms of Various Variables","authors":"Süleyman Burak Tozkoparan, Ferhan Odabaşi","doi":"10.17275/per.23.60.10.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this research, it is aimed to reveal safety expectations of pre-service teachers in the design of smartphones and to examine them in terms of 8 variables as follows: gender, generation (Y-Z), department/branch group, main purpose of smartphone use, operating system, number of smartphones used, smartphone replacement frequency and smartphone segment preference. Quantitative research method was adopted, and the relational survey model was used. For the collection of data, Safety Expectations in the Design of Smartphones Scale (SEitDoSS) -which was developed as part of the first author’s Ph.D. thesis- consisting of 21 items and 5 factors (user-specific expectations, device-specific expectations, integration expectations, health-specific expectations and support expectations) and a Personal Information Form created to collect participants’ information about the variables. Anadolu and Osmangazi Universities (universities in Eskişehir province of Türkiye) were selected to obtain data. The application was carried out online in the spring semester of the 2020-2021 Academic Year, and a total of 252 participants were reached during the 8-week application. According to the results, pre-service teachers’ safety expectations in the design of smartphones are generally high. There was a significant difference in at least one dimension in terms of 7 variables: gender, generation, department/branch group, main purpose of smartphone use, operating system, smartphone replacement frequency and smartphone segment preference. According to the “number of smartphones used”, there was no significant difference in terms of safety expectations of smartphones in design. The implications of the results are discussed with the support of the studies in the literature.","PeriodicalId":36886,"journal":{"name":"Participatory Educational Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Participatory Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17275/per.23.60.10.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this research, it is aimed to reveal safety expectations of pre-service teachers in the design of smartphones and to examine them in terms of 8 variables as follows: gender, generation (Y-Z), department/branch group, main purpose of smartphone use, operating system, number of smartphones used, smartphone replacement frequency and smartphone segment preference. Quantitative research method was adopted, and the relational survey model was used. For the collection of data, Safety Expectations in the Design of Smartphones Scale (SEitDoSS) -which was developed as part of the first author’s Ph.D. thesis- consisting of 21 items and 5 factors (user-specific expectations, device-specific expectations, integration expectations, health-specific expectations and support expectations) and a Personal Information Form created to collect participants’ information about the variables. Anadolu and Osmangazi Universities (universities in Eskişehir province of Türkiye) were selected to obtain data. The application was carried out online in the spring semester of the 2020-2021 Academic Year, and a total of 252 participants were reached during the 8-week application. According to the results, pre-service teachers’ safety expectations in the design of smartphones are generally high. There was a significant difference in at least one dimension in terms of 7 variables: gender, generation, department/branch group, main purpose of smartphone use, operating system, smartphone replacement frequency and smartphone segment preference. According to the “number of smartphones used”, there was no significant difference in terms of safety expectations of smartphones in design. The implications of the results are discussed with the support of the studies in the literature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智能手机设计中职前教师安全期望的多变量检验
本研究旨在揭示职前教师在智能手机设计中的安全期望,并从性别、世代(Y-Z)、部门/分支群体、智能手机使用的主要目的、操作系统、使用智能手机的数量、智能手机更换频率和智能手机细分市场偏好等8个变量对其进行检验。采用定量研究方法,采用关系调查模型。对于数据的收集,智能手机设计中的安全期望量表(SEitDoSS)是第一作者博士论文的一部分,由21个项目和5个因素(用户特定期望、设备特定期望、集成期望、健康特定期望和支持期望)组成,并创建了一个个人信息表,以收集参与者关于变量。选择阿纳多卢大学和奥斯曼加齐大学(土耳其埃斯基谢希尔省的大学)获取数据。该申请在2020-2021学年春季学期在线进行,在为期8周的申请中,共有252名参与者参与。研究结果显示,职前教师对智能手机设计的安全期望普遍较高。在7个变量中,至少有一个维度存在显著差异:性别、世代、部门/分支机构群体、智能手机使用的主要目的、操作系统、智能手机更换频率和智能手机细分市场偏好。根据“使用的智能手机数量”,智能手机在设计上的安全预期没有显著差异。在文献研究的支持下讨论了结果的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Participatory Educational Research
Participatory Educational Research Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
147
期刊最新文献
Determination of Teacher Qualifications from the Perspective of Stakeholders: Rubric Development Study Augmented Reality in Mathematics Education: A Systematic Review Fostering Safe Schools: Empowering Educators and Parents in the Fight Against Violence in Early Childhood Education Setting The Effect of Mathematics Teaching with Mobile Augmented Reality Technology on Secondary School Students’ Attitudes and Academic Achievements The Effect of Computer-Supported Stem Applications on Secondary Students' Achievement and Computational Thinking Skills
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1