Back and forth? The role of labour market resources and segments for work-related exits from and returns to welfare benefit receipt in Germany

Torsten Lietzmann, Katrin Hohmeyer
{"title":"Back and forth? The role of labour market resources and segments for work-related exits from and returns to welfare benefit receipt in Germany","authors":"Torsten Lietzmann, Katrin Hohmeyer","doi":"10.1515/zsr-2022-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The German economy has witnessed a stable upswing in the last decade. At the same time, receipt of welfare benefits did not decline substantially. In a dualised labour market and a welfare system under an activation paradigm (Unemployment Benefit II), many (former) welfare recipients face instable and lowpaid employment opportunities. Hence, returns to benefit receipt are rather common. Using administrative data and hazard rate models, we study the determinants of stable exits from welfare to employment focussing on the labour market segment after exit. Employment-related exits are slightly more common and significantly more stable than other exits. Labour market resources are associated with quicker employment-related exits, but not always with longer self-sufficiency. The stability of exits is also related to the economic sector and the type of employment. The results indicate that in addition to encouraging leaving welfare receipt, measures promoting good and sustainable employment are needed.","PeriodicalId":83585,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Sozialreform","volume":"68 1","pages":"180 - 210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Sozialreform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zsr-2022-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract The German economy has witnessed a stable upswing in the last decade. At the same time, receipt of welfare benefits did not decline substantially. In a dualised labour market and a welfare system under an activation paradigm (Unemployment Benefit II), many (former) welfare recipients face instable and lowpaid employment opportunities. Hence, returns to benefit receipt are rather common. Using administrative data and hazard rate models, we study the determinants of stable exits from welfare to employment focussing on the labour market segment after exit. Employment-related exits are slightly more common and significantly more stable than other exits. Labour market resources are associated with quicker employment-related exits, but not always with longer self-sufficiency. The stability of exits is also related to the economic sector and the type of employment. The results indicate that in addition to encouraging leaving welfare receipt, measures promoting good and sustainable employment are needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
来来回回?德国劳动力市场资源的作用以及与工作相关的退出和返回到福利收入的部分
德国经济在过去十年中稳步上升。与此同时,领取福利的人数并没有大幅下降。在二元劳动力市场和激活范式下的福利制度(失业福利II)中,许多(前)福利接受者面临不稳定和低薪的就业机会。因此,返还收益收据是相当普遍的。利用行政数据和风险率模型,我们研究了从福利到就业的稳定退出的决定因素,重点关注退出后的劳动力市场部分。与就业相关的退出比其他退出更常见,也更稳定。劳动力市场资源与就业相关的更快退出有关,但并不总是与更长的自给自足有关。出口的稳定性也与经济部门和就业类型有关。结果表明,除了鼓励离开福利金外,还需要采取措施促进良好和可持续的就业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Eine Analyse zukünftiger Alterseinkommen im Lichte des Drei-Schichten-Modells: Zum Status quo der Altersvorsorge heutiger Generationen Neue Wege zu sozialen Rechten? Digitale Märkte für Rechtsdienstleistungen in Deutschland Interaktion im Schatten der Hierarchie: Zwang und Zusammenarbeit in Jobcentern Umverteilung im deutschen Wohlfahrtsstaat: Familie zwischen gewährten und eingeforderten Ressourcen News Coverage of Mental Health in Children During the COVID-19 Pandemic – An Analysis of the German Press Landscape
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1