The strengths and opportunities for improvement of the Baldrige Performance Excellence Program

Q2 Business, Management and Accounting Quality Management Journal Pub Date : 2021-07-03 DOI:10.1080/10686967.2021.1920867
Saad Ghafoor, R. Mann, N. Grigg
{"title":"The strengths and opportunities for improvement of the Baldrige Performance Excellence Program","authors":"Saad Ghafoor, R. Mann, N. Grigg","doi":"10.1080/10686967.2021.1920867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This research investigates the strengths and opportunities for improvement of the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s (NIST’s) Baldrige Performance Excellence Program (BPEP) in terms of designing the Malcolm Baldrige Excellence Framework (MBEF) and its deployment (promoting the MBEF, facilitating its use, and awarding Business Excellence (BE)) within the United States. Data were collected directly from NIST and compared to the data from 28 other BE Custodians (BECs) from 26 countries to identify the BE promotion, facilitation, and award related activities that the other BECs could learn from the BPEP and the best practices that the BPEP could learn from the other BECs. It was found that BPEP’s key strengths are a) the design of the MBEF, with 34.5% of BECs adopting it, second only to the EFQM with 44.8% adopters b) the awards process is robust with NIST rating its processes in this area more highly than in other areas. The BPEP’s key opportunities for improvement were in increasing the awareness of BE and facilitating organizations to use a BE approach. Recommendations are provided on how the BPEP can be improved, with examples of practices used by other BECs.","PeriodicalId":38208,"journal":{"name":"Quality Management Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":"128 - 144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10686967.2021.1920867","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2021.1920867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This research investigates the strengths and opportunities for improvement of the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s (NIST’s) Baldrige Performance Excellence Program (BPEP) in terms of designing the Malcolm Baldrige Excellence Framework (MBEF) and its deployment (promoting the MBEF, facilitating its use, and awarding Business Excellence (BE)) within the United States. Data were collected directly from NIST and compared to the data from 28 other BE Custodians (BECs) from 26 countries to identify the BE promotion, facilitation, and award related activities that the other BECs could learn from the BPEP and the best practices that the BPEP could learn from the other BECs. It was found that BPEP’s key strengths are a) the design of the MBEF, with 34.5% of BECs adopting it, second only to the EFQM with 44.8% adopters b) the awards process is robust with NIST rating its processes in this area more highly than in other areas. The BPEP’s key opportunities for improvement were in increasing the awareness of BE and facilitating organizations to use a BE approach. Recommendations are provided on how the BPEP can be improved, with examples of practices used by other BECs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波多里奇卓越绩效计划的优势和改进机会
摘要本研究探讨了美国国家标准与技术研究院(NIST)的鲍德里奇卓越绩效计划(BPEP)在设计马尔科姆·鲍德里奇卓越框架(MBEF)及其部署(促进MBEF、促进其使用和授予卓越业务(BE))方面的优势和改进机会。数据直接从NIST收集,并与来自26个国家的其他28个BE保管人(BECs)的数据进行比较,以确定其他BECs可以从BPEP学习的BE促进、促进和奖励相关活动,以及BPEP可以从其他BECs学习的最佳实践。研究发现,BPEP的主要优势是:a) MBEF的设计,34.5%的BECs采用了它,仅次于EFQM的44.8%采用者;b)奖励过程是稳健的,NIST在这一领域对其过程的评价高于其他领域。BPEP改进的关键机会在于提高BE的意识,并促进组织使用BE方法。提供了关于如何改进BPEP的建议,并提供了其他BECs使用的实践示例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Quality Management Journal
Quality Management Journal Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Private hospitals quality assessment: Evidence from Jordan using HEALTHQUAL model The Role of Top Management Commitment, Employee Involvement, and Training and Development on Employee Performance: Evidence from the Banking Sector of an Emerging Economy Investigating the critical success factors for integrating Lean Six Sigma and Industry 4.0 Determinants of working capital management for noncertified and certified firms from the EFQM Excellence Model Quality aspects vs consumption values: What affects intention to book hotels in the post-Covid era?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1