Role of context in knowledge flows: Host country versus headquarters as sources of MNC subsidiary knowledge inheritance

IF 5.7 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Global Strategy Journal Pub Date : 2022-03-11 DOI:10.1002/gsj.1434
Mike Horia Mihail Teodorescu, Prithwiraj Choudhury, Tarun Khanna
{"title":"Role of context in knowledge flows: Host country versus headquarters as sources of MNC subsidiary knowledge inheritance","authors":"Mike Horia Mihail Teodorescu,&nbsp;Prithwiraj Choudhury,&nbsp;Tarun Khanna","doi":"10.1002/gsj.1434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Research Summary</h3>\n \n <p>We respond to calls in the strategy and international business literature for elucidating how multinational subsidiaries develop contextual intelligence in host countries and how they use the local context as a source of valuable opportunities for learning. Applying the theoretical lens of subsidiary absorptive capacity and building on a gravity model, we propose an approach that can distinguish and compare the influences of the host country context and headquarters over the subsidiary knowledge production. Some subsidiaries may become global second headquarters and innovation hubs, as evidenced qualitatively in the paper with the case of Cisco. Essentially, subsidiaries, characterized by higher stocks of knowledge and greater number of locally hired employees are likely to absorb relatively more knowledge from the local host country context.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Managerial Summary</h3>\n \n <p>Managers at multinational companies have to carefully balance acquiring knowledge from the headquarters, vis-a-vis acquiring knowledge from the local context of countries where the firm has subsidiaries. In contrast to a “headquarter-centric” approach where most of the knowledge management activities are centered around the MNC headquarters, we argue that larger subsidiaries, often characterized by a large presence of local R&amp;D workers, might disproportionately draw knowledge from the local context, rather than from the headquarters. In addition to developing theoretical propositions along these lines, we provide an illustrative example of how Cisco opened a “second headquarters” in India, to learn from the rich local context.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47563,"journal":{"name":"Global Strategy Journal","volume":"12 4","pages":"658-678"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Strategy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gsj.1434","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Research Summary

We respond to calls in the strategy and international business literature for elucidating how multinational subsidiaries develop contextual intelligence in host countries and how they use the local context as a source of valuable opportunities for learning. Applying the theoretical lens of subsidiary absorptive capacity and building on a gravity model, we propose an approach that can distinguish and compare the influences of the host country context and headquarters over the subsidiary knowledge production. Some subsidiaries may become global second headquarters and innovation hubs, as evidenced qualitatively in the paper with the case of Cisco. Essentially, subsidiaries, characterized by higher stocks of knowledge and greater number of locally hired employees are likely to absorb relatively more knowledge from the local host country context.

Managerial Summary

Managers at multinational companies have to carefully balance acquiring knowledge from the headquarters, vis-a-vis acquiring knowledge from the local context of countries where the firm has subsidiaries. In contrast to a “headquarter-centric” approach where most of the knowledge management activities are centered around the MNC headquarters, we argue that larger subsidiaries, often characterized by a large presence of local R&D workers, might disproportionately draw knowledge from the local context, rather than from the headquarters. In addition to developing theoretical propositions along these lines, we provide an illustrative example of how Cisco opened a “second headquarters” in India, to learn from the rich local context.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景在知识流动中的作用:东道国与总部作为跨国公司附属知识继承的来源
我们回应战略和国际商业文献中的呼吁,阐明跨国子公司如何在东道国发展情境智能,以及它们如何利用当地情境作为宝贵学习机会的来源。本文运用子公司吸收能力的理论视角,在引力模型的基础上,提出了一种能够区分和比较东道国背景和总部对子公司知识生产影响的方法。一些子公司可能成为全球第二总部和创新中心,这在论文中以思科为例进行了定性证明。基本上,以知识储备较高和当地雇用雇员人数较多为特点的子公司可能从当地东道国的情况中吸收相对较多的知识。跨国公司的管理者必须仔细平衡从总部获取知识与从公司设有子公司的国家的当地环境中获取知识之间的关系。与“以总部为中心”的方法相反,大多数知识管理活动都以跨国公司总部为中心,我们认为,规模较大的子公司通常以大量当地研发人员为特征,可能会不成比例地从当地环境中汲取知识,而不是从总部汲取知识。除了沿着这些思路提出理论命题外,我们还提供了一个说明思科如何在印度开设“第二总部”的例子,以借鉴丰富的当地背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The Global Strategy Journal is a premier platform dedicated to publishing highly influential managerially-oriented global strategy research worldwide. Covering themes such as international and global strategy, assembling the global enterprise, and strategic management, GSJ plays a vital role in advancing our understanding of global business dynamics.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information - TOC A perspective on three trade-offs of blockchain technology for the global strategy of the MNC Issue Information - TOC Inward FDI and local firms' political connections in emerging markets: Evidence from China Issue Information - TOC
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1