The oscillation resistance ratio (ORR) for understanding inelastic response

Hossein Soleimankhani, G. MacRae, Tim Sullivan
{"title":"The oscillation resistance ratio (ORR) for understanding inelastic response","authors":"Hossein Soleimankhani, G. MacRae, Tim Sullivan","doi":"10.5459/bnzsee.54.4.299-312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Single-storey systems with different hysteretic characteristic are subjected to impulse-type short duration and long duration earthquake records to investigate the effects of hysteretic behaviour and ground motion characteristics on the seismic response. EPP, bilinear, Takeda, SINA, and flag-shaped hysteretic models loops are considered and an energy approach is taken to explain the inelastic behaviour. The first part of the work is based on analyses of the single-storey systems without any torsion, however; torsional irregularity is considered in the later analyses. \nIt is shown that structures with the same backbone curve, but different hysteretic characteristics, tend to experience the same maximum response under short duration earthquake records, where there is one major displacement excursion. The likelihood of further displacement in the reverse (i.e. negative) direction is characterized using energy methods and free vibration analyses along with a new proposed “oscillation resistance ratio (ORR)” are employed to improve the understanding of the seismic response. Hysteretic models with low ORR, such as SINA and flag-shaped, are shown to have a greater likelihood of higher absolute displacement response in the negative direction compared with those with fatter hysteretic loops. The understanding of the response in terms of energy reconciles some differences in the ability of initial stiffness versus secant stiffness based methods to predict peak displacement demands with account for different ground motion characteristics. \nThe same peak displacements in the primary direction was also observed for structures with stiffness/strength eccentricities under an impulse-type earthquake record. However, during unloading, the elastic energy stored in the out-of-plane elements is released causing greater displacement on the weak side in the reverse direction.","PeriodicalId":46396,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.54.4.299-312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Single-storey systems with different hysteretic characteristic are subjected to impulse-type short duration and long duration earthquake records to investigate the effects of hysteretic behaviour and ground motion characteristics on the seismic response. EPP, bilinear, Takeda, SINA, and flag-shaped hysteretic models loops are considered and an energy approach is taken to explain the inelastic behaviour. The first part of the work is based on analyses of the single-storey systems without any torsion, however; torsional irregularity is considered in the later analyses. It is shown that structures with the same backbone curve, but different hysteretic characteristics, tend to experience the same maximum response under short duration earthquake records, where there is one major displacement excursion. The likelihood of further displacement in the reverse (i.e. negative) direction is characterized using energy methods and free vibration analyses along with a new proposed “oscillation resistance ratio (ORR)” are employed to improve the understanding of the seismic response. Hysteretic models with low ORR, such as SINA and flag-shaped, are shown to have a greater likelihood of higher absolute displacement response in the negative direction compared with those with fatter hysteretic loops. The understanding of the response in terms of energy reconciles some differences in the ability of initial stiffness versus secant stiffness based methods to predict peak displacement demands with account for different ground motion characteristics. The same peak displacements in the primary direction was also observed for structures with stiffness/strength eccentricities under an impulse-type earthquake record. However, during unloading, the elastic energy stored in the out-of-plane elements is released causing greater displacement on the weak side in the reverse direction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用振荡阻力比(ORR)来理解非弹性响应
对具有不同滞回特性的单层体系进行脉冲型短时和长时地震记录,研究滞回特性和地震动特性对地震反应的影响。考虑了EPP、双线性、Takeda、SINA和旗形滞回模型回路,并采用能量方法来解释非弹性行为。然而,第一部分的工作是基于对没有任何扭转的单层系统的分析;在后面的分析中考虑了扭转不规则性。结果表明,具有相同主干曲线但迟滞特性不同的结构,在存在一次大位移偏移的短持续时间地震记录下,往往具有相同的最大响应。利用能量方法表征了反向(即负)方向进一步位移的可能性,并采用自由振动分析以及新提出的“振荡阻力比(ORR)”来提高对地震反应的理解。具有低ORR的滞回模型,如SINA和旗形滞回模型,与具有较宽滞回环的滞回模型相比,在负方向上具有更高的绝对位移响应的可能性更大。对能量响应的理解调和了初始刚度与基于割线刚度的方法在预测峰值位移需求方面的一些差异,并考虑了不同的地面运动特性。在脉冲型地震记录下,具有刚度/强度偏心率的结构在初级方向上也观察到相同的峰值位移。但在卸载过程中,储存在面外单元中的弹性能被释放,导致弱侧反方向发生较大位移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
17.60%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Earthquake design loads for retaining walls Infrastructure planning emergency levels of service for the Wellington region, Aotearoa New Zealand – An operationalised framework Seismic fragility of reinforced concrete buildings with hollow-core flooring systems Evaluation of the Inter-frequency Correlation of New Zealand CyberShake Crustal Earthquake Simulations Seismic protection of artefacts with adhesives and base-isolation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1