Comparing Effect Sizes and their Confidence Intervals: A Primer on Equivalence Testing in Educational Research

IF 4.2 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research Pub Date : 2022-07-15 DOI:10.7821/naer.2022.7.930
Hector F. Ponce-Renova
{"title":"Comparing Effect Sizes and their Confidence Intervals: A Primer on Equivalence Testing in Educational Research","authors":"Hector F. Ponce-Renova","doi":"10.7821/naer.2022.7.930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper’s objective was to teach the Equivalence Testing applied to Educational Research to emphasize recommendations and to increase quality of research. Equivalence Testing is a technique used to compare effect sizes or means of two different studies to ascertain if they would be statistically equivalent. For making accessible Equivalence Testing, this technique was explained with two examples by conducting manual calculations, using an online calculator, the software R, the software SPSS, and a t table. Furthermore, the software R with an Equivalence Testing code was used, and its results were graphed and discussed with details. Among other recommendations given, Equivalence Testing can be a useful tool for comparing means and effects within certain bounds that could hopefully imply a practical significance to provide meaning to findings. The results of Equivalence Testing can indicate that two treatments´ effects are statistically equivalent or not. Thus, the Equivalence Testing can be a channel to replicate studies and observe if there is a possible pattern regarding the appearance of a phenomenon.","PeriodicalId":51833,"journal":{"name":"Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2022.7.930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper’s objective was to teach the Equivalence Testing applied to Educational Research to emphasize recommendations and to increase quality of research. Equivalence Testing is a technique used to compare effect sizes or means of two different studies to ascertain if they would be statistically equivalent. For making accessible Equivalence Testing, this technique was explained with two examples by conducting manual calculations, using an online calculator, the software R, the software SPSS, and a t table. Furthermore, the software R with an Equivalence Testing code was used, and its results were graphed and discussed with details. Among other recommendations given, Equivalence Testing can be a useful tool for comparing means and effects within certain bounds that could hopefully imply a practical significance to provide meaning to findings. The results of Equivalence Testing can indicate that two treatments´ effects are statistically equivalent or not. Thus, the Equivalence Testing can be a channel to replicate studies and observe if there is a possible pattern regarding the appearance of a phenomenon.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较效应大小及其置信区间:教育研究中的等价性测试初探
本文的目的是教等效测试应用于教育研究,强调建议和提高研究质量。等效检验是一种用来比较两项不同研究的效应大小或方法,以确定它们在统计上是否相等的技术。为了便于使用等效性测试,本文用两个例子解释了该技术,即使用在线计算器、R软件、SPSS软件和t表进行手动计算。此外,还使用了带有等效测试代码的R软件,并对其结果进行了详细的图解和讨论。在给出的其他建议中,等效检验可以是在一定范围内比较手段和效果的有用工具,这可能意味着为发现提供意义的实际意义。等效性检验的结果可以表明两种处理的效果在统计上是否相等。因此,等效性测试可以是一个渠道,以重复研究和观察是否有一个可能的模式有关的现象的出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research
Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
4.40%
发文量
20
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: NAER seeks academic articles on educational sciences based on innovative experiences which can contribute the development of the educational sciences in any of their manifestations and provide new approaches to teaching as a response to the deep changes our society is going through.
期刊最新文献
Improving reporting standards in quantitative educational intervention research: introducing the CLOSER and CIDER checklists. Violence and the Right to Education in the Northern Triangle of Central America The 'Birth of Doubt' and 'The Existence of Other Possibilities': Exploring How the ACAD Toolkit Supports Design for Learning Suicidal Ideation in Undergraduate Students of Social Work: A Quantitative Study Moving Learning: A Systematic Review of Mobile Learning Applications for Online Higher Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1