Edward Livingston, Nullification, and Louisiana's Political Transformation

IF 0.8 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY JOURNAL OF THE EARLY REPUBLIC Pub Date : 2023-08-26 DOI:10.1353/jer.2023.a905097
J. Sturgeon
{"title":"Edward Livingston, Nullification, and Louisiana's Political Transformation","authors":"J. Sturgeon","doi":"10.1353/jer.2023.a905097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article corrects major historiographical flaws concerning Louisiana's early relationship with the United States and argues the federal tariff was the most critical factor influencing state reconciliation. Leading Louisiana historians like Peter Kastor concur that slavery inspired French-speaking Creole planters to embrace U.S. citizenship. Their consensus further holds that Creole commitment to slavery crystalized their national cultural acceptance. However, Creole planters shared far more with Caribbean slaveholders than those in the American South. Throughout Louisiana's early territorial and statehood years, slavery bolstered animosity between Anglo-Americans and Creoles. The former viewed Creoles through a racist lens and remained wary of their slave-related cultural practices, like openly acknowledging mixed-race relationships. The latter feared that English-speaking migrants would undermine their legal hegemony and inspire insurrection. Though slavery impeded Louisiana unity, the federal tariff did more than anything else to foster it. Throughout the 1820s, Creole planters became reliant on federal sugar protections to alleviate competition. Thus, the tariff gave Creoles a considerable incentive to embrace national political identities.Louisiana's redoubtable statesman Edward Livingston was particularly instrumental in promoting reconciliation on both sides. Before becoming Andrew Jackson's Secretary of State, the exiled New Yorker spent decades representing his adopted state's culturally divergent Creoles. When South Carolina triggered the Nullification Crisis in 1832-1833, Livingston spoke with Louisiana's unique perspective and eloquently guided Jackson's response which deftly balanced federalism's necessities with states' rights concerns. Thus, through the tariff, Louisiana not only embraced its new American identity, but the government employed Louisiana's voice to preserve the Union.","PeriodicalId":45213,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF THE EARLY REPUBLIC","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF THE EARLY REPUBLIC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jer.2023.a905097","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This article corrects major historiographical flaws concerning Louisiana's early relationship with the United States and argues the federal tariff was the most critical factor influencing state reconciliation. Leading Louisiana historians like Peter Kastor concur that slavery inspired French-speaking Creole planters to embrace U.S. citizenship. Their consensus further holds that Creole commitment to slavery crystalized their national cultural acceptance. However, Creole planters shared far more with Caribbean slaveholders than those in the American South. Throughout Louisiana's early territorial and statehood years, slavery bolstered animosity between Anglo-Americans and Creoles. The former viewed Creoles through a racist lens and remained wary of their slave-related cultural practices, like openly acknowledging mixed-race relationships. The latter feared that English-speaking migrants would undermine their legal hegemony and inspire insurrection. Though slavery impeded Louisiana unity, the federal tariff did more than anything else to foster it. Throughout the 1820s, Creole planters became reliant on federal sugar protections to alleviate competition. Thus, the tariff gave Creoles a considerable incentive to embrace national political identities.Louisiana's redoubtable statesman Edward Livingston was particularly instrumental in promoting reconciliation on both sides. Before becoming Andrew Jackson's Secretary of State, the exiled New Yorker spent decades representing his adopted state's culturally divergent Creoles. When South Carolina triggered the Nullification Crisis in 1832-1833, Livingston spoke with Louisiana's unique perspective and eloquently guided Jackson's response which deftly balanced federalism's necessities with states' rights concerns. Thus, through the tariff, Louisiana not only embraced its new American identity, but the government employed Louisiana's voice to preserve the Union.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
爱德华·利文斯顿,废除法律与路易斯安那州的政治转型
摘要:本文纠正了关于路易斯安那州与美国早期关系的主要史学缺陷,并认为联邦关税是影响州和解的最关键因素。像Peter Kastor这样的路易斯安那州著名历史学家同意奴隶制促使讲法语的克里奥尔种植园主接受美国公民身份。他们的共识进一步认为,克里奥尔人对奴隶制的承诺凝结了他们国家的文化接受度。然而,克里奥尔种植园主与加勒比奴隶主分享的东西比美国南部的多得多。在路易斯安纳州成立之初,奴隶制加剧了盎格鲁-美国人和克里奥尔人之间的敌意。前者从种族主义的角度看待克里奥尔人,并对他们与奴隶有关的文化习俗保持警惕,比如公开承认混合种族关系。后者担心说英语的移民会破坏他们的法律霸权,引发叛乱。虽然奴隶制阻碍了路易斯安那州的统一,但联邦关税却比其他任何东西都更能促进路易斯安那州的统一。在整个19世纪20年代,克里奥尔种植园主开始依赖联邦政府的糖保护措施来缓解竞争。因此,关税给了克里奥尔人接受国家政治认同的巨大动力。路易斯安那州令人敬畏的政治家爱德华·利文斯顿在促进双方和解方面发挥了特别重要的作用。在成为安德鲁•杰克逊(Andrew Jackson)的国务卿之前,这位流亡的纽约人花了几十年的时间代表他移居的州的克里奥尔人(creole)。当南卡罗来纳州在1832年至1833年引发“无效危机”时,利文斯顿以路易斯安那州独特的视角发言,并雄辩地指导杰克逊的回应,巧妙地平衡了联邦主义的必要性和各州的权利关切。因此,通过关税,路易斯安那州不仅接受了它新的美国身份,而且政府利用路易斯安那州的声音来维护联邦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Early Republic is a quarterly journal committed to publishing the best scholarship on the history and culture of the United States in the years of the early republic (1776–1861). JER is published for the Society for Historians of the Early American Republic. SHEAR membership includes an annual subscription to the journal.
期刊最新文献
“An Emporium of Beggars,” Medical Rhetoric, Disability, and Philadelphia’s Early Nationalist Welfare Crises The West India Regiments and the War of 1812 The Contagion of Liberty: The Politics of Smallpox in the American Revolution by Andrew Wehrman (review) Index—Volume 43, 2023 “Servants not Soldiers”: The Origins of Slavery in the United States Army, 1797–1816
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1