Can certification increase trade fairness and worker empowerment? Lessons from Fairtrade International-certified plantations in Ecuador

IF 0.9 3区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY International Sociology Pub Date : 2022-07-21 DOI:10.1177/02685809221103598
Laura T. Raynolds
{"title":"Can certification increase trade fairness and worker empowerment? Lessons from Fairtrade International-certified plantations in Ecuador","authors":"Laura T. Raynolds","doi":"10.1177/02685809221103598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the strategic potential and empirical challenges of private governance in promoting decent work in global agriculture by curtailing buyer power and fostering labor agency, drawing lessons from Fairtrade International-certified flower plantations in Ecuador. The study explains (1) Fairtrade’s logic in promoting ‘trade fairness’ and ‘worker empowerment’ and operationalization of these values via its certification standards, (2) the power relations shaping certification practices in global flower markets and Ecuadorian plantations, and (3) the grounded implications of participation for firms and workers. Important lessons emerge. First, while Fairtrade pursues a promising avenue for challenging the buyer control that erodes supplier and worker power, it has only marginally reduced floral buyer power due to retailer resistance, low-bar certification competition, and programmatic regulatory gaps. Second, although Fairtrade’s empowerment approach has strengthened labor agency within and beyond the workplace, bolstering individual empowerment has proved easier than fostering associational power. As I show, certification practices and outcomes are mediated by commodity-specific global market politics and localized enterprise, labor force, and legal contestations which explain why program aspirations are often not realized. Standard systems can reshape internal trade relations and organizations but cannot alone ensure global trade equity or robust labor representation.","PeriodicalId":47662,"journal":{"name":"International Sociology","volume":"37 1","pages":"716 - 739"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02685809221103598","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This article analyzes the strategic potential and empirical challenges of private governance in promoting decent work in global agriculture by curtailing buyer power and fostering labor agency, drawing lessons from Fairtrade International-certified flower plantations in Ecuador. The study explains (1) Fairtrade’s logic in promoting ‘trade fairness’ and ‘worker empowerment’ and operationalization of these values via its certification standards, (2) the power relations shaping certification practices in global flower markets and Ecuadorian plantations, and (3) the grounded implications of participation for firms and workers. Important lessons emerge. First, while Fairtrade pursues a promising avenue for challenging the buyer control that erodes supplier and worker power, it has only marginally reduced floral buyer power due to retailer resistance, low-bar certification competition, and programmatic regulatory gaps. Second, although Fairtrade’s empowerment approach has strengthened labor agency within and beyond the workplace, bolstering individual empowerment has proved easier than fostering associational power. As I show, certification practices and outcomes are mediated by commodity-specific global market politics and localized enterprise, labor force, and legal contestations which explain why program aspirations are often not realized. Standard systems can reshape internal trade relations and organizations but cannot alone ensure global trade equity or robust labor representation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认证能提高贸易公平和工人赋权吗?厄瓜多尔国际公平贸易认证种植园的经验教训
本文分析了私人治理在通过削减买方权力和促进劳工代理促进全球农业体面工作方面的战略潜力和经验挑战,借鉴了国际公平贸易组织在厄瓜多尔认证的花卉种植园。该研究解释了(1)公平贸易促进“贸易公平”和“工人赋权”的逻辑,并通过其认证标准将这些价值观付诸实施;(2)影响全球花卉市场和厄瓜多尔种植园认证实践的权力关系;(3)参与对公司和工人的基础影响。出现了重要的教训。首先,尽管公平贸易寻求一条有希望的途径来挑战削弱供应商和工人权力的买家控制,但由于零售商的抵制、低标准认证竞争和计划监管差距,它只略微降低了花卉买家的权力。其次,尽管公平贸易的赋权方法加强了工作场所内外的劳工代理,但事实证明,加强个人赋权比培养联想力更容易。正如我所展示的,认证实践和结果是由特定商品的全球市场政治和本地化的企业、劳动力和法律争论所调解的,这解释了为什么项目愿望往往没有实现。标准体系可以重塑内部贸易关系和组织,但不能单独确保全球贸易公平或强大的劳动力代表性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Established in 1986 by the International Sociological Association (ISA), International Sociology was one of the first sociological journals to reflect the research interests and voice of the international community of sociologists. This highly ranked peer-reviewed journal publishes contributions from diverse areas of sociology, with a focus on international and comparative approaches. The journal presents innovative theory and empirical approaches, with attention to insights into the sociological imagination that deserve worldwide attention. New ways of interpreting the social world and sociology from an international perspective provide innovative insights into key sociological issues.
期刊最新文献
Conflating the map with the territory: Challenges for evidence syntheses on homicide in a global context. Mothers, sons, sisters and grief in the gangster economy: US necrogovernance in Philadelphia's low-income Puerto Rican diaspora. A global migration industry in local contexts: Home care and domestic work brokerage in Austria and Sri Lanka. Social exchange or reinforcement of women’s educational advantage? The influence of educational assortative mating on occupational assortative mating for couples in Spain Pro-social attitudes towards ethno-religious out-groups during the COVID-19 pandemic: A survey experiment in five countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1