Comparison of Visit Length and Waiting Time of Patients in Public and Private Clinics in the North of Iran

IF 0.6 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Scope Pub Date : 2021-10-17 DOI:10.5812/jhealthscope.112698
R. Gholamzadeh Nikjoo, M. Sokhanvar, Khadijeh Motahari, Y. Partovi, M. Khodayari
{"title":"Comparison of Visit Length and Waiting Time of Patients in Public and Private Clinics in the North of Iran","authors":"R. Gholamzadeh Nikjoo, M. Sokhanvar, Khadijeh Motahari, Y. Partovi, M. Khodayari","doi":"10.5812/jhealthscope.112698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The visit length is considered one of the indicators for assessing patients’ satisfaction. Factors such as waiting time for getting a visit affects the desirability of the visit. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the visit length and waiting time of patients in public and private clinics in Tabriz. Methods: This is a descriptive-analytic study conducted in five clinics in 2018. A questionnaire-based survey was used to collect data from 386 participants recruited through simple random sampling. Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were applied to analyze the data using SPSS version 22.0. Results: Overall, the mean visit length was 25.5 and 25.4 min in public and private centers, respectively, while the mean waiting time was 141.2 and 156.4 min in public and private centers, respectively. There was no significant difference between public and private centers regarding the visit length (P > 0.05); however, there was a significant difference between public and private centers in terms of waiting time (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The waiting time was too much, especially in private clinics, which can negatively affect patient satisfaction. Therefore, suggested interventions may consist of using internet and telephone admission, scheduling a waiting list, and requiring physicians to be present on time.","PeriodicalId":12857,"journal":{"name":"Health Scope","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Scope","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/jhealthscope.112698","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The visit length is considered one of the indicators for assessing patients’ satisfaction. Factors such as waiting time for getting a visit affects the desirability of the visit. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the visit length and waiting time of patients in public and private clinics in Tabriz. Methods: This is a descriptive-analytic study conducted in five clinics in 2018. A questionnaire-based survey was used to collect data from 386 participants recruited through simple random sampling. Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were applied to analyze the data using SPSS version 22.0. Results: Overall, the mean visit length was 25.5 and 25.4 min in public and private centers, respectively, while the mean waiting time was 141.2 and 156.4 min in public and private centers, respectively. There was no significant difference between public and private centers regarding the visit length (P > 0.05); however, there was a significant difference between public and private centers in terms of waiting time (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The waiting time was too much, especially in private clinics, which can negatively affect patient satisfaction. Therefore, suggested interventions may consist of using internet and telephone admission, scheduling a waiting list, and requiring physicians to be present on time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊朗北部公立和私立诊所患者就诊时间和候诊时间的比较
背景:就诊时间被认为是评估患者满意度的指标之一。诸如等待访问的时间等因素会影响访问的可取性。目的:本研究旨在调查大不里士公立和私立诊所患者的就诊时间和等待时间。方法:这是一项2018年在五家诊所进行的描述性分析研究。采用基于问卷的调查,从386名通过简单随机抽样招募的参与者中收集数据。Mann-Whitney U和Kruskal-Wallis检验采用SPSS 22.0版对数据进行分析。结果:总体而言,在公共和私人中心的平均就诊时间分别为25.5和25.4分钟,而在公共和私营中心的平均等待时间分别为141.2和156.4分钟。公共和私人中心的就诊时间无显著差异(P>0.05);然而,在等待时间方面,公立和私立中心之间存在显著差异(P<0.05)。结论:等待时间过长,尤其是在私立诊所,这会对患者满意度产生负面影响。因此,建议的干预措施可能包括使用互联网和电话入院,安排等候名单,并要求医生按时到场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Scope
Health Scope PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
16.70%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
The Whole-of-Government, Whole-of-Society Approach in Tackling COVID-19 Pandemic in Iran: Evidence for Policymakers Prevalence of Refractive Errors and Associated Factors in the Population of the Eye Cohort Study in Southeast Iran A Report on Attempts to Acquire Exercise Habits through Japanese Health Education for Adult Workers from Cebu, Philippines A Survey-Based Study of Public Awareness About COVID-19 Infection, Severity, Reinfection, Vaccine Acceptance, and Government Measures in Pakistan Comparative Effect of Amylose Concentration in Brown and White Rice on Hepatocellular Insufficiency Using Rat Bioassay
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1