{"title":"Sulfolane in contaminated sites: environmental toxicity and bioremediation technologies","authors":"M. F. Khan, Linlong Yu, G. Achari","doi":"10.1139/er-2021-0071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sulfolane is widely used around the world as an industrial solvent for purifying sour natural gas. However, because of accidental spillage and improper on-site storage/disposal procedures, reports of groundwater, aquifer, and soil contaminations have raised concerns about its potential impacts on humans and the ecosystem. As a contaminant of emerging concern, there is a lack of information on the human toxicity of sulfolane. Several bioremediation technologies have been conducted to assess the biodegradation potential of sulfolane in contaminated groundwater and soils. This review presents and discusses the available literature on the toxicity of sulfolane, which could be useful for developing proper sulfolane guidelines in different media. The oral LD50 of sulfolane varies from 0.6 to 3.5 g·(kg body mass)–1 for different mammalian species, including guinea pig, mouse, rabbit, and rat. In addition, we also review the various sulfolane bioremediation studies to date, highlighting the efficacy of aerobic versus anaerobic bioremediation of sulfolane at contaminated sites. The zero-order biodegradation rate of sulfolane varies from 0.033 to 190 mg·L–1·day–1 depending on the initial concentration of sulfolane, nutrients, oxygen levels, temperature, and other parameters. Effective aerobic treatment technologies can lead to the complete mineralization of sulfolane with sulfuric acid as its major end by-product. Furthermore, the application of aerobic granulation as a promising biotechnology for sulfolane biodegradation is also discussed. This review further discusses the significance of utilizing sulfolane-degrading bacteria to reduce treatment times and presents information for future researchers and scientists on the specific isolates recorded.","PeriodicalId":50514,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2021-0071","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Sulfolane is widely used around the world as an industrial solvent for purifying sour natural gas. However, because of accidental spillage and improper on-site storage/disposal procedures, reports of groundwater, aquifer, and soil contaminations have raised concerns about its potential impacts on humans and the ecosystem. As a contaminant of emerging concern, there is a lack of information on the human toxicity of sulfolane. Several bioremediation technologies have been conducted to assess the biodegradation potential of sulfolane in contaminated groundwater and soils. This review presents and discusses the available literature on the toxicity of sulfolane, which could be useful for developing proper sulfolane guidelines in different media. The oral LD50 of sulfolane varies from 0.6 to 3.5 g·(kg body mass)–1 for different mammalian species, including guinea pig, mouse, rabbit, and rat. In addition, we also review the various sulfolane bioremediation studies to date, highlighting the efficacy of aerobic versus anaerobic bioremediation of sulfolane at contaminated sites. The zero-order biodegradation rate of sulfolane varies from 0.033 to 190 mg·L–1·day–1 depending on the initial concentration of sulfolane, nutrients, oxygen levels, temperature, and other parameters. Effective aerobic treatment technologies can lead to the complete mineralization of sulfolane with sulfuric acid as its major end by-product. Furthermore, the application of aerobic granulation as a promising biotechnology for sulfolane biodegradation is also discussed. This review further discusses the significance of utilizing sulfolane-degrading bacteria to reduce treatment times and presents information for future researchers and scientists on the specific isolates recorded.
期刊介绍:
Published since 1993, Environmental Reviews is a quarterly journal that presents authoritative literature reviews on a wide range of environmental science and associated environmental studies topics, with emphasis on the effects on and response of both natural and manmade ecosystems to anthropogenic stress. The authorship and scope are international, with critical literature reviews submitted and invited on such topics as sustainability, water supply management, climate change, harvesting impacts, acid rain, pesticide use, lake acidification, air and marine pollution, oil and gas development, biological control, food chain biomagnification, rehabilitation of polluted aquatic systems, erosion, forestry, bio-indicators of environmental stress, conservation of biodiversity, and many other environmental issues.