Stock option, contract elements design and corporate innovation output – an analyse based on risk-taking and performance-based incentives

IF 1.8 Q3 MANAGEMENT Nankai Business Review International Pub Date : 2021-07-16 DOI:10.1108/NBRI-09-2020-0045
Q. Shi, Shufang Xiao, Kai-Lin Chang, Jiaying Wu
{"title":"Stock option, contract elements design and corporate innovation output – an analyse based on risk-taking and performance-based incentives","authors":"Q. Shi, Shufang Xiao, Kai-Lin Chang, Jiaying Wu","doi":"10.1108/NBRI-09-2020-0045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nWith the accelerated technological advancement, innovation has become a critical factor, which affects the core competitiveness of a company. However, studies about the relationship between internal stock option mechanisms and innovation productivity remain limited. Therefore, this paper aims to examine the impact of stock options and their elements design on innovation output from an internal mechanism perspective.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nUsing a sample of 302 stock option incentive plans announced and implemented between 2006 and 2016, this study uses the propensity score matching and difference-in-difference model to find out whether the implementation of stock options improves the innovation outputs of enterprises.\n\n\nFindings\nBased on the statistical analysis, it is concluded that: stock options can stimulate corporate innovation; a stock option may drive innovation outputs through two ways, performance-based incentives and risk-taking incentives, with the latter one playing a more dominant role and the risk-taking incentives of stock options, could be optimised when the non-executives granting proportion is larger, the granting range is limited, the incentive period is longer, the exercisable proportion is increasing, the price-to-strike ratio is lower and relatively loose performance assessment criteria are applied.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe conclusion reached in the study may provide valuable information to listed firms in designing and implementing the stock option plans.\n","PeriodicalId":44958,"journal":{"name":"Nankai Business Review International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nankai Business Review International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/NBRI-09-2020-0045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose With the accelerated technological advancement, innovation has become a critical factor, which affects the core competitiveness of a company. However, studies about the relationship between internal stock option mechanisms and innovation productivity remain limited. Therefore, this paper aims to examine the impact of stock options and their elements design on innovation output from an internal mechanism perspective. Design/methodology/approach Using a sample of 302 stock option incentive plans announced and implemented between 2006 and 2016, this study uses the propensity score matching and difference-in-difference model to find out whether the implementation of stock options improves the innovation outputs of enterprises. Findings Based on the statistical analysis, it is concluded that: stock options can stimulate corporate innovation; a stock option may drive innovation outputs through two ways, performance-based incentives and risk-taking incentives, with the latter one playing a more dominant role and the risk-taking incentives of stock options, could be optimised when the non-executives granting proportion is larger, the granting range is limited, the incentive period is longer, the exercisable proportion is increasing, the price-to-strike ratio is lower and relatively loose performance assessment criteria are applied. Originality/value The conclusion reached in the study may provide valuable information to listed firms in designing and implementing the stock option plans.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
股票期权、合同要素设计和企业创新产出——基于风险承担和绩效激励的分析
目的随着技术进步的加快,创新已成为影响企业核心竞争力的关键因素。然而,关于内部股票期权机制与创新生产率之间关系的研究仍然有限。因此,本文旨在从内部机制的角度考察股票期权及其要素设计对创新产出的影响。设计/方法论/方法本研究以2006年至2016年期间宣布和实施的302项股票期权激励计划为样本,采用倾向得分匹配和差异中的差异模型来了解股票期权的实施是否提高了企业的创新产出。通过统计分析发现:股票期权能够刺激企业创新;股票期权可以通过两种方式驱动创新产出,即基于绩效的激励和风险承担激励,后者发挥更大的主导作用,当非高管授予比例更大、授予范围有限、激励期限更长、可行使比例增加时,股票期权的风险承担激励可以得到优化,价格与执行比率较低,并且应用相对宽松的性能评估标准。创新性/价值研究得出的结论可能为上市公司设计和实施股票期权计划提供有价值的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Nankai Business Review International (NBRI) provides insights in to the adaptation of American and European management theory in China, the differences and exchanges between Chinese and western management styles, the relationship between Chinese enterprises’ management practice and social evolution and showcases the development and evolution of management theories based on Chinese cultural characteristics. The journal provides research of interest to managers and entrepreneurs worldwide with an interest in China as well as research associations and scholars focusing on Chinese problems in business and management.
期刊最新文献
Research on business model innovation of SMEs in the industrial internet era: building theory from the case of PAYA Delegation and salary information disclosure strategies of customer acquisition and retention Enhancing word of mouth in the quick service restaurants: role of perceived brand globalness and localness Can stakeholders’ attention to innovation promote corporate innovation? The effect of referral tasks on customers’ referral likelihood on social platforms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1