Validity of Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio and Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio in Diagnosing Early-onset Neonatal Sepsis in Full-term Newborns

N. Mahmoud, Mohammed Abdelhakeem, H. Mohamed, Gamal Baheeg
{"title":"Validity of Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio and Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio in Diagnosing Early-onset Neonatal Sepsis in Full-term Newborns","authors":"N. Mahmoud, Mohammed Abdelhakeem, H. Mohamed, Gamal Baheeg","doi":"10.5812/compreped.115378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study aimed to evaluate the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as diagnostic adjunct tests for early-onset neonatal sepsis (EOS). Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study included 80 full-term neonates with confirmed EOS and 80 healthy newborns. All examinations were done 24 hours after birth. Neonatal sepsis (NS) was characterized as a positive blood culture with symptoms of infection. Positive diagnostic indicators, including I/T ratio > 0.2, total leukocytes [WBCs] of either 5109/L or > 15109/L, thrombocytopenia [150,000/mm3], CRP > 1 mg/dL, and procalcitonin >0.5 ng/mL were considered as NS. Results: As the predictors of EOS, the sensitivity of NLR and PLR was 67% and 70%, and their specificity was 99% and 73%, respectively. Also, positive predictive value (PPV) of NLR and PLR was 98% and 72%, respectively. We found a weak correlation between platelets and sepsis, Strong correlation between WBCs and PLR with sepsis, and a moderate correlation among the ratio of immature to total neutrophil counts (I/T ratio), all of which were significant. Besides, concerning NLR with sepsis, we found an inverse correlation between lymphocytes and sepsis. Conclusions: PLR and NLR are important predictive markers for EOS (PPV of NLR and PLR was 98% and 72%, respectively). Moreover, leukocytosis, thrombocytopenia, high c-reactive protein (CRP), high procalcitonin, and positive blood culture were correlated with the risk of NS. NLR and PLR showed more specificity than CRP and procalcitonin.","PeriodicalId":37929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comprehensive Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Comprehensive Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/compreped.115378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as diagnostic adjunct tests for early-onset neonatal sepsis (EOS). Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study included 80 full-term neonates with confirmed EOS and 80 healthy newborns. All examinations were done 24 hours after birth. Neonatal sepsis (NS) was characterized as a positive blood culture with symptoms of infection. Positive diagnostic indicators, including I/T ratio > 0.2, total leukocytes [WBCs] of either 5109/L or > 15109/L, thrombocytopenia [150,000/mm3], CRP > 1 mg/dL, and procalcitonin >0.5 ng/mL were considered as NS. Results: As the predictors of EOS, the sensitivity of NLR and PLR was 67% and 70%, and their specificity was 99% and 73%, respectively. Also, positive predictive value (PPV) of NLR and PLR was 98% and 72%, respectively. We found a weak correlation between platelets and sepsis, Strong correlation between WBCs and PLR with sepsis, and a moderate correlation among the ratio of immature to total neutrophil counts (I/T ratio), all of which were significant. Besides, concerning NLR with sepsis, we found an inverse correlation between lymphocytes and sepsis. Conclusions: PLR and NLR are important predictive markers for EOS (PPV of NLR and PLR was 98% and 72%, respectively). Moreover, leukocytosis, thrombocytopenia, high c-reactive protein (CRP), high procalcitonin, and positive blood culture were correlated with the risk of NS. NLR and PLR showed more specificity than CRP and procalcitonin.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血小板与淋巴细胞比率和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率在诊断足月新生儿早期败血症中的有效性
背景:本研究旨在评价中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)作为早发性新生儿脓毒症(EOS)诊断辅助试验的价值。方法:本前瞻性横断面研究纳入80例确诊的EOS足月新生儿和80例健康新生儿。所有检查均在出生后24小时进行。新生儿脓毒症(NS)的特征是血培养阳性并伴有感染症状。阳性诊断指标包括I/T比值>.2、白细胞总数[WBCs]为5109/L或>为15109/L、血小板减少[150000 /mm3]、CRP >为1mg /dL、降钙素原>为0.5 ng/mL。结果:NLR和PLR作为EOS的预测指标,敏感性分别为67%和70%,特异性分别为99%和73%。NLR和PLR的阳性预测值分别为98%和72%。我们发现血小板与脓毒症的相关性较弱,白细胞和PLR与脓毒症的相关性较强,未成熟中性粒细胞计数与总中性粒细胞计数之比(I/T ratio)的相关性中等,均具有统计学意义。此外,关于NLR与脓毒症,我们发现淋巴细胞与脓毒症呈负相关。结论:PLR和NLR是EOS的重要预测指标(NLR和PLR的PPV分别为98%和72%)。此外,白细胞增多、血小板减少、高c反应蛋白(CRP)、高降钙素原和阳性血培养与NS的风险相关。NLR和PLR的特异性高于CRP和降钙素原。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Comprehensive Pediatrics
Journal of Comprehensive Pediatrics Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Journal of Comprehensive Pediatrics is the official publication of Iranian Society of Pediatrics (ISP) and a peer-reviewed medical journal which is published quarterly. It is informative for all practicing pediatrics including general medical profession.
期刊最新文献
Social Anxiety in Students with Specific Learning Disorders Based on Emotion Regulation and Emotional Intelligence: The Mediating Role of Perceived Self-Efficacy Aortic Elasticity Changes in Children with Type I Diabetes Mellitus Compared to Controls Maternal Education is a Major Factor in Growth Regulation in Twins and Singletons Efficacy of N‑Acetylcysteine in Children with Moderate COVID-19: A Placebo-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluation of Gastrointestinal Manifestations and Predictive Factors in Pediatric Henoch-Schönlein Purpura
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1