Determination of Optimal Fluoroscopic Angulations for Left Main Coronary Artery Ostial Interventions: 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography Validation

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of interventional cardiology Pub Date : 2022-03-10 DOI:10.1155/2022/2411824
Yuhe Sheng, Jie Yu, Quanmin Jing, Yaling Han, Yi Li, K. Xu, M. Qiu, Yingdong Wang, G. Mintz, Bin Wang
{"title":"Determination of Optimal Fluoroscopic Angulations for Left Main Coronary Artery Ostial Interventions: 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography Validation","authors":"Yuhe Sheng, Jie Yu, Quanmin Jing, Yaling Han, Yi Li, K. Xu, M. Qiu, Yingdong Wang, G. Mintz, Bin Wang","doi":"10.1155/2022/2411824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Current recommendations for the best views for the left main coronary artery (LMCA) ostium intervention are empirical. Objectives To determine the optimal projection to visualize the LMCA ostium using only fluoroscopy. Methods The optimal projection to visualize the LMCA ostium was determined using fluoroscopic images of superimposing the lowest points of the distal ends of two J tipped wires in the noncoronary cusp (NCC) and right coronary cusp (RCC). This was validated independently using 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) reconstruction. Results Satisfactory images of the overlapping wires in NCC and RCC could be obtained in 90% (45/50). Between the fluoroscopic and the 3D-CT reconstruction approaches, the mean difference for NCC and RCC overlapping at horizontal axes is -1.8 with a 95% limit of agreement between −3.94 and 0.34 (p=0.10) and at vertical axes −1.6 with a 95% limit of agreement between −3.46 and 0.26 (p=0.09); and the mean difference for the optimal projection to visualize the LMCA ostium at horizontal axes is −3.22 with a 95% limit of agreement between -7.26 and 0.81 (p=0.11) and at vertical axes −2.31 with a 95% limit of agreement between −5.83 and 1.21 (p=0.09). The 3D angulation deviation for the optimal projection to visualize the LMCA ostium was 8.5° ± 4.7° when the LMCA ostium faced the NCC-RCC commissure (n = 32) and 22.3° ± 16.0° (p=0.009) when it did not (n = 13). Conclusions The optimal projection for LMCA ostial intervention can be determined using fluoroscopic images of superimposing wires in the NCC and RCC when the LMCA ostium faces the NCC-RCC commissure, as was the case in 71% of the patients studied.","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interventional cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2411824","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background Current recommendations for the best views for the left main coronary artery (LMCA) ostium intervention are empirical. Objectives To determine the optimal projection to visualize the LMCA ostium using only fluoroscopy. Methods The optimal projection to visualize the LMCA ostium was determined using fluoroscopic images of superimposing the lowest points of the distal ends of two J tipped wires in the noncoronary cusp (NCC) and right coronary cusp (RCC). This was validated independently using 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) reconstruction. Results Satisfactory images of the overlapping wires in NCC and RCC could be obtained in 90% (45/50). Between the fluoroscopic and the 3D-CT reconstruction approaches, the mean difference for NCC and RCC overlapping at horizontal axes is -1.8 with a 95% limit of agreement between −3.94 and 0.34 (p=0.10) and at vertical axes −1.6 with a 95% limit of agreement between −3.46 and 0.26 (p=0.09); and the mean difference for the optimal projection to visualize the LMCA ostium at horizontal axes is −3.22 with a 95% limit of agreement between -7.26 and 0.81 (p=0.11) and at vertical axes −2.31 with a 95% limit of agreement between −5.83 and 1.21 (p=0.09). The 3D angulation deviation for the optimal projection to visualize the LMCA ostium was 8.5° ± 4.7° when the LMCA ostium faced the NCC-RCC commissure (n = 32) and 22.3° ± 16.0° (p=0.009) when it did not (n = 13). Conclusions The optimal projection for LMCA ostial intervention can be determined using fluoroscopic images of superimposing wires in the NCC and RCC when the LMCA ostium faces the NCC-RCC commissure, as was the case in 71% of the patients studied.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定左冠状动脉主干介入治疗的最佳透视角度:三维计算机断层扫描验证
背景目前关于左主干冠状动脉(LMCA)口介入治疗的最佳视图的建议是经验性的。目的确定仅用x线透视观察LMCA口的最佳投影。方法采用非冠状动脉尖(NCC)和右冠状动脉尖(RCC)两根J型线远端最低点叠加的透视图像确定LMCA口的最佳投影。使用三维计算机断层扫描(3D-CT)重建独立验证了这一点。结果90%(45/50)的患者对NCC和RCC的重叠线成像满意。在透视和3D-CT重建方法之间,NCC和RCC重叠在水平轴上的平均差异为-1.8,95%的一致性界限在- 3.94和0.34之间(p=0.10),在垂直轴上的平均差异为- 1.6,95%的一致性界限在- 3.46和0.26之间(p=0.09);在水平轴上显示LMCA口的最佳投影的平均差值为- 3.22,95%的一致性在-7.26和0.81之间(p=0.11),在垂直轴上的平均差值为- 2.31,95%的一致性在- 5.83和1.21之间(p=0.09)。当LMCA口面对nc - rcc连接时,最佳投影显示LMCA口的三维角度偏差为8.5°±4.7°(n = 32),而当LMCA口不面对nc - rcc连接时,最佳投影显示LMCA口的三维角度偏差为22.3°±16.0°(p=0.009) (n = 13)。结论:当LMCA口面对NCC-RCC接合点时,LMCA口介入的最佳投影可以通过NCC和RCC的重叠线的透视图像来确定,71%的患者都是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of interventional cardiology
Journal of interventional cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Interventional Cardiology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for cardiologists determined to stay current in the diagnosis, investigation, and management of patients with cardiovascular disease and its associated complications. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies focusing on new procedures and techniques in all major subject areas in the field, including: Acute coronary syndrome Coronary disease Congenital heart diseases Myocardial infarction Peripheral arterial disease Valvular heart disease Cardiac hemodynamics and physiology Haemostasis and thrombosis
期刊最新文献
A Comparative Analysis of Primary and Bailout ADR in CTO-PCI The Effect of Electromagnetic Interference Produced by Smartphones Using 5G Network on Patients With Permanent Pacemakers (EMS5G-PPM Study) Comparison of Sheathless and Sheathed Guiding Catheters in Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using the DynamX Sirolimus-Eluting Bioadaptor: 12-Month Clinical and Imaging Outcomes Vascular Complications and Bleeding After Transfemoral TAVR With Surgical Versus Percutaneous Approach: A Contemporary Prospective Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1