Comparison of Methods for Identifying Differential Step Functioning with Polytomous Item Response Data

IF 1.1 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Applied Measurement in Education Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI:10.1080/08957347.2022.2155650
Holmes W. Finch
{"title":"Comparison of Methods for Identifying Differential Step Functioning with Polytomous Item Response Data","authors":"Holmes W. Finch","doi":"10.1080/08957347.2022.2155650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Much research has been devoted to identification of differential item functioning (DIF), which occurs when the item responses for individuals from two groups differ after they are conditioned on the latent trait being measured by the scale. There has been less work examining differential step functioning (DSF), which is present for polytomous items when the conditional likelihood of responses to specific categories differ between groups. DSF impacts estimation of the measured trait and reduces the effectiveness of standard DIF detection methods. The purpose of this simulation study was to extend upon earlier work by comparing several methods for detecting the presence of DSF in polytomous items, including an approach based on the lasso estimation of the generalized partial credit model. Results show that the lasso GPCM technique controlled the Type I error rate while yielding power rates somewhat lower than logistic regression and the MIMIC model, which were not able to control the Type I error rate in some conditions. An empirical example is also presented, and implications of this study for practice are discussed.","PeriodicalId":51609,"journal":{"name":"Applied Measurement in Education","volume":"35 1","pages":"255 - 271"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Measurement in Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2022.2155650","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Much research has been devoted to identification of differential item functioning (DIF), which occurs when the item responses for individuals from two groups differ after they are conditioned on the latent trait being measured by the scale. There has been less work examining differential step functioning (DSF), which is present for polytomous items when the conditional likelihood of responses to specific categories differ between groups. DSF impacts estimation of the measured trait and reduces the effectiveness of standard DIF detection methods. The purpose of this simulation study was to extend upon earlier work by comparing several methods for detecting the presence of DSF in polytomous items, including an approach based on the lasso estimation of the generalized partial credit model. Results show that the lasso GPCM technique controlled the Type I error rate while yielding power rates somewhat lower than logistic regression and the MIMIC model, which were not able to control the Type I error rate in some conditions. An empirical example is also presented, and implications of this study for practice are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于多同构项目响应数据的差分阶跃函数识别方法比较
差异项目功能(DIF)是指两组个体在被量表测量潜在特质后,其项目反应存在差异,目前已有大量研究致力于鉴别差异项目功能。当对特定类别的反应的条件可能性在组之间不同时,对多同构项目的差异步骤功能(DSF)的检查工作较少。DSF影响被测特征的估计,降低了标准DIF检测方法的有效性。本模拟研究的目的是在早期工作的基础上,通过比较几种检测多同义项目中DSF存在的方法,包括一种基于广义部分信用模型的套索估计的方法。结果表明,lasso GPCM技术控制了I型错误率,但产生的功率率略低于logistic回归和MIMIC模型,在某些情况下不能控制I型错误率。最后给出了一个实证例子,并讨论了本研究对实践的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Because interaction between the domains of research and application is critical to the evaluation and improvement of new educational measurement practices, Applied Measurement in Education" prime objective is to improve communication between academicians and practitioners. To help bridge the gap between theory and practice, articles in this journal describe original research studies, innovative strategies for solving educational measurement problems, and integrative reviews of current approaches to contemporary measurement issues. Peer Review Policy: All review papers in this journal have undergone editorial screening and peer review.
期刊最新文献
New Tests of Rater Drift in Trend Scoring Automated Scoring of Short-Answer Questions: A Progress Report Item and Test Characteristic Curves of Rank-2PL Models for Multidimensional Forced-Choice Questionnaires Impact of violating unidimensionality on Rasch calibration for mixed-format tests Can Adaptive Testing Improve Test-Taking Experience? A Case Study on Educational Survey Assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1