Investigation of the Validity Evidence of the Information Literacy Self-Efficacy Scale (ILSES) Among Undergraduate Students

Pub Date : 2021-06-21 DOI:10.15760/comminfolit.2021.15.1.1
Max Sommer, Angela M. Kohnen, Albert D. Ritzhaupt, John Hampton
{"title":"Investigation of the Validity Evidence of the Information Literacy Self-Efficacy Scale (ILSES) Among Undergraduate Students","authors":"Max Sommer, Angela M. Kohnen, Albert D. Ritzhaupt, John Hampton","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2021.15.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research was to provide validity evidence for the Information Literacy Self-Efficacy Scale (ILSES), a widely used instrument that was constructed in 2006. The researchers were interested in investigating the validity of this instrument due to the evolution of the information environment that has taken place since the scale’s original development, mostly as a result of the prominence of the internet. Data were collected from undergraduate students participating in a broader information literacy research study (n = 253). Data were subjected to descriptive analyses, internal consistency reliability, and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). After evaluating three different CFA models based on the ILSES’ construction, the researchers determined that a four-factor model fit the data with the following latent constructs: 1) Initiating the search strategy, 2) Assessing and comprehending the information, 3) Interpreting, synthesizing, and using the information, and 4) Evaluating the product and process. A discussion of these findings is provided in light of the evolving information environments in which undergraduate students are expected to use information for their academic, personal, and professional lives.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2021.15.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to provide validity evidence for the Information Literacy Self-Efficacy Scale (ILSES), a widely used instrument that was constructed in 2006. The researchers were interested in investigating the validity of this instrument due to the evolution of the information environment that has taken place since the scale’s original development, mostly as a result of the prominence of the internet. Data were collected from undergraduate students participating in a broader information literacy research study (n = 253). Data were subjected to descriptive analyses, internal consistency reliability, and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). After evaluating three different CFA models based on the ILSES’ construction, the researchers determined that a four-factor model fit the data with the following latent constructs: 1) Initiating the search strategy, 2) Assessing and comprehending the information, 3) Interpreting, synthesizing, and using the information, and 4) Evaluating the product and process. A discussion of these findings is provided in light of the evolving information environments in which undergraduate students are expected to use information for their academic, personal, and professional lives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
大学生信息素养自我效能感量表效度证据调查
本研究的目的是为信息素养自我效能感量表(ILSES)提供有效性证据,该量表是一种广泛使用的工具,于2006年建立。研究人员有兴趣调查这一工具的有效性,因为自该量表最初发展以来,信息环境发生了演变,主要是由于互联网的突出。数据来自参与更广泛的信息素养研究的本科生(n=253)。对数据进行描述性分析、内部一致性可靠性和验证性因素分析(CFA)。在根据ILSES的结构评估了三种不同的CFA模型后,研究人员确定四因素模型符合以下潜在结构的数据:1)启动搜索策略,2)评估和理解信息,3)解释、综合和使用信息,4)评估产品和过程。鉴于不断发展的信息环境,本科生有望在学术、个人和职业生活中使用信息,我们对这些发现进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1