Home care after elective vascular surgery: still more questions than answers

Christine D Jones, R. Boxer
{"title":"Home care after elective vascular surgery: still more questions than answers","authors":"Christine D Jones, R. Boxer","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Home care services support the goal of many patients and caregivers to live independently at home and to ‘age in place’. Home care referrals in the USA have increased nearly 60% from 2002 to 2016 resulting in an over 88% increase in spending to over US$18 billion for Medicare beneficiaries.1 In a recent 2015–2016 survey in Canada, an estimated 881 800 households, or just over 6% of all households, used home care services including nursing and personal/home support services.2 Despite the widespread use of home care services in many countries, relatively little is known about how to optimise patient outcomes in home care. Many questions remain about which patients are most likely to benefit, which services (eg, nursing, therapies, personal care) are most beneficial for which patients and what intensity and duration of services are ideal for different patient populations.\n\nRecently, de Mestral and colleagues identified that home care nursing was associated with lower odds of emergency department (ED)visits and rehospitalisations for patients discharged after elective vascular surgeries (ie, carotid endarterectomy, endovascular aortic aneurysm repair and bypass for lower extremity peripheral arterial disease) in Canada.3 This study is important because it adds to the evidence by examining home care in a population very different from the majority of studies focused on the effect of home care on patient outcomes. Most studies focus on patients with heart failure (HF) and the results have been mixed. One major difference to highlight is that the risk for ED visits and rehospitalisations in patients following an elective vascular surgery procedure is lower compared with patients who have an unplanned HF hospitalisation. The former population would have a lower risk of 30-day readmissions (~6%–19% readmission rate) compared with patients with HF who are readmitted more …","PeriodicalId":49653,"journal":{"name":"Quality & Safety in Health Care","volume":"29 1","pages":"968 - 970"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009754","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality & Safety in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Home care services support the goal of many patients and caregivers to live independently at home and to ‘age in place’. Home care referrals in the USA have increased nearly 60% from 2002 to 2016 resulting in an over 88% increase in spending to over US$18 billion for Medicare beneficiaries.1 In a recent 2015–2016 survey in Canada, an estimated 881 800 households, or just over 6% of all households, used home care services including nursing and personal/home support services.2 Despite the widespread use of home care services in many countries, relatively little is known about how to optimise patient outcomes in home care. Many questions remain about which patients are most likely to benefit, which services (eg, nursing, therapies, personal care) are most beneficial for which patients and what intensity and duration of services are ideal for different patient populations. Recently, de Mestral and colleagues identified that home care nursing was associated with lower odds of emergency department (ED)visits and rehospitalisations for patients discharged after elective vascular surgeries (ie, carotid endarterectomy, endovascular aortic aneurysm repair and bypass for lower extremity peripheral arterial disease) in Canada.3 This study is important because it adds to the evidence by examining home care in a population very different from the majority of studies focused on the effect of home care on patient outcomes. Most studies focus on patients with heart failure (HF) and the results have been mixed. One major difference to highlight is that the risk for ED visits and rehospitalisations in patients following an elective vascular surgery procedure is lower compared with patients who have an unplanned HF hospitalisation. The former population would have a lower risk of 30-day readmissions (~6%–19% readmission rate) compared with patients with HF who are readmitted more …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
择期血管手术后的家庭护理:问题多于答案
家庭护理服务支持许多患者和护理人员在家独立生活和“就地养老”的目标。从2002年到2016年,美国的家庭护理转诊增加了近60%,导致支出增加了88%以上,达到18美元以上 1在加拿大最近的2015-2016年调查中,估计有881 800户家庭,即略高于所有家庭的6%,使用了包括护理和个人/家庭支持服务在内的家庭护理服务。2尽管许多国家广泛使用家庭护理服务,但人们对如何优化家庭护理中的患者结果知之甚少。关于哪些患者最有可能受益,哪些服务(如护理、治疗、个人护理)对哪些患者最有利,以及哪些服务强度和持续时间适合不同的患者群体,仍然存在许多问题。不久前de Mestral及其同事发现,在加拿大,家庭护理与择期血管手术(即颈动脉内膜切除术、血管内主动脉瘤修复术和下肢外周动脉疾病搭桥术)后出院的患者急诊科(ED)就诊和再次住院的几率较低有关。3这项研究很重要,因为它增加了通过在一个与大多数关注家庭护理对患者结果影响的研究非常不同的人群中检查家庭护理的证据。大多数研究都集中在心力衰竭(HF)患者身上,结果喜忧参半。需要强调的一个主要区别是,与计划外HF住院的患者相比,选择性血管手术后患者急诊就诊和再次住院的风险更低。前者再次入院30天的风险较低(约6%–19% 再入院率)与再次入院更多的HF患者相比…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Quality & Safety in Health Care
Quality & Safety in Health Care 医学-卫生保健
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Accuracy of telephone triage for predicting adverse outcomes in suspected COVID-19: an observational cohort study. Quality framework for remote antenatal care: qualitative study with women, healthcare professionals and system-level stakeholders. Addressing social determinants of health in primary care: a quasi-experimental study using unannounced standardised patients to evaluate the impact of audit/feedback on physicians' rates of identifying and responding to social needs. Reporting on implementation trials with null findings: the need for concurrent process evaluation reporting. Antibiotic documentation: death by a thousand clicks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1