‘Why do accounting issues end up in the “too difficult” box?’ A practitioner view

IF 2 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Accounting and Business Research Pub Date : 2022-07-29 DOI:10.1080/00014788.2022.2079699
H. Hoogervorst
{"title":"‘Why do accounting issues end up in the “too difficult” box?’ A practitioner view","authors":"H. Hoogervorst","doi":"10.1080/00014788.2022.2079699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is a pleasure to have the opportunity to react to Katherine Schipper ’ s thoughtful paper (Schip-per 2022). The IASB has always worked closely with academia and Katherine ’ s thought leader-ship has always been much appreciated. Katherine Schipper ’ s paper touches upon some of the most intractable accounting issues that have proven to be unsolvable over the years. She men-tions the distinction between liabilities and equity, performance reporting and other comprehen-sive income. These were indeed very tough issues which took up much of our Board time during my chairmanship without us being able to come up with a 100% perfect solution. Katherine gives two main reasons for such accounting issues remaining elusive. The fi rst underlying cause is the lack of clear conceptual solutions. Even when a conceptually grounded solution exists, a solution may not be feasible practically, for example when it requires so many subjective judgments and estimates that the resulting information is unlikely to be comparable. It can also be the case that the solution leads to fi nancial performance reporting outcomes that are viewed as inherently undesirable. In this respect Katherine refers speci fi cally to the widespread hostility to volatility in the income statement.","PeriodicalId":7054,"journal":{"name":"Accounting and Business Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting and Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2022.2079699","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is a pleasure to have the opportunity to react to Katherine Schipper ’ s thoughtful paper (Schip-per 2022). The IASB has always worked closely with academia and Katherine ’ s thought leader-ship has always been much appreciated. Katherine Schipper ’ s paper touches upon some of the most intractable accounting issues that have proven to be unsolvable over the years. She men-tions the distinction between liabilities and equity, performance reporting and other comprehen-sive income. These were indeed very tough issues which took up much of our Board time during my chairmanship without us being able to come up with a 100% perfect solution. Katherine gives two main reasons for such accounting issues remaining elusive. The fi rst underlying cause is the lack of clear conceptual solutions. Even when a conceptually grounded solution exists, a solution may not be feasible practically, for example when it requires so many subjective judgments and estimates that the resulting information is unlikely to be comparable. It can also be the case that the solution leads to fi nancial performance reporting outcomes that are viewed as inherently undesirable. In this respect Katherine refers speci fi cally to the widespread hostility to volatility in the income statement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么会计问题最终会被归为“太难”?实践者的观点
很高兴有机会对Katherine Schipper的深思熟虑的论文(Schip/2022)做出回应。国际会计准则理事会一直与学术界密切合作,凯瑟琳的思想领袖地位一直备受赞赏。Katherine Schipper的论文涉及了一些最棘手的会计问题,这些问题多年来一直无法解决。她强调了负债和权益、业绩报告和其他综合收入之间的区别。这些确实是非常棘手的问题,在我担任主席期间,这些问题占用了我们董事会的大部分时间,而我们却无法拿出100%完美的解决方案。Katherine给出了这类会计问题仍然难以捉摸的两个主要原因。第一个根本原因是缺乏明确的概念解决方案。即使存在基于概念的解决方案,解决方案在实践中也可能不可行,例如,当它需要如此多的主观判断和估计,以至于产生的信息不太可能具有可比性时。也可能是这种解决方案导致财务绩效报告结果被认为是固有的不良结果。在这方面,Katherine特别提到了对损益表波动性的普遍敌意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Accounting and Business Research publishes papers containing a substantial and original contribution to knowledge. Papers may cover any area of accounting, broadly defined and including corporate governance, auditing and taxation. However the focus must be accounting, rather than (corporate) finance or general management. Authors may take a theoretical or an empirical approach, using either quantitative or qualitative methods. They may aim to contribute to developing and understanding the role of accounting in business. Papers should be rigorous but also written in a way that makes them intelligible to a wide range of academics and, where appropriate, practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing auditors’ professional skepticism through nudges: an eye-tracking experiment Taming the dragon: stock exchange comment letters and earnings volatility The predictive ability of share-based compensation expense Investor cognitive engagement with earnings information: evidence from pupillary response Using legitimacy strategies to secure organisational survival over time: the case of EFRAG
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1